Abstract
The study found no single definition of accountability for organisations within the broadcasting and communications fields but many variables which constituted elements of accountability that depended on other components such as the range of stakeholders involved, funding and so on. There is a definition of accountability that comes from another field (that of humanitarian aid) which says it goes beyond reporting on decisions and actions but looks to take
account of the needs, concerns, capacities and dispositions of affected parties, and explaining the meaning and implications of, and the reasons for, actions and decisions. Accountability is thus a measure of the quality of the relationship between an agent (a body offering a service or product) and a principal (the person or group for whom the service or product is intended).1
While coming from another area, this relationship between parties involved as agent and principal can well be applied to broadcasting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2009 Andrea Millwood Hargrave and Colin Shaw
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hargrave, A.M., Shaw, C. (2009). Accountability. In: Accountability and the Public Interest in Broadcasting. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594289_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594289_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28551-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59428-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)