Skip to main content

Identifying the Causal Effect of Political Regimes on Employment

  • Chapter
Method and Substance in Macrocomparative Analysis

Part of the book series: Research Methods Series ((REMES))

Abstract

The question studied here is whether political regimes, dichotomized as democracies and autocracies, affect the rate of growth of employment. But broader issues are at stake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron. 2003. “Root Causes: A Historical Approach to Assessing the Role of Institutions in Economic Development.” Finance and Development 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achen, Christopher. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemyia, Takeshi. 1994. Introduction to Statistics and Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, Joshua D. and Alan B. Krueger. 1999. “Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics.” Chapter 23 in The Handbook of Labor Economics, volume III, edited by O. Ashenfelter and D. Card. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, Joshua D. and Alan B. Krueger. 2001. “Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15: 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Sascha O. and Andrea Ichino. 2002. “Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores.” The Stata Journal 7: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, Richard A. 2004. Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, Marianne, Esther Duflo, and Sendhill Mullainathan. 2004. “How Much Should we Trust Differences-in-differences Estimates?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119: 249–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawid, A.P. 2000. “Causal Inference without Counterfactuals.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 95: 407–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duflo, Esther. 2002. “Empirical Methods.” Class notes. Department of Economics, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, Dorothy. 2001. “Conditionals.” Pp. 385–414 in The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic, edited by Lou Goble. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, James. 1991. “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science.” World Politics 43: 169–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson. 1979. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 4th edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorn, Geoffrey. 1991. Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, James J. 1996. “Instrumental Variables: A Cautionary Tale.” Technical Working Paper No. 185. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, James J. 1997. “Instrumental Variables: A Study in Implicit Behavioral Assumptions Used in Making Program Evaluations.” Journal o fHuman Resources 32: 441–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, James J. 1992. “Randomization and Social Policy Evaluation” in Evaluating Welfare and Training Programs, edited by C. Manski and I. Garfinkel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, James J. 2004. “The Scientific Model of Causality.” Working Paper. Department of Economics, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Paul W. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 945–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens, Guido W. 2002. “Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effect under Exogeneity: A Review.” Working Paper. Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaniyathu, Sunny. In progress. The Balance Sheet of Colonialism: Economic Development in the Colonial Period. PhD Dissertation. Department of Politics, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary, and Langche Zeng. 2002. “When Can History be Our Guide? The Pitfalls of Counterfactual Inference.” Available at gking.harvard.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.L. 2002 [1973]. “The Logic of Conditionals.” Pp. 106–14 in Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Readings, edited by Yuri Balashov and Alex Rosenberg. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles F. 1995. Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. 1997. “Some Fundamental Puzzles in Economic History/Development.” In The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, edited by W. Brian Arthur, Steven N. Durlauf, and David A. Lane. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. and Robert Paul Thomas. 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam. 2006. “Is the Science of Comparative Politics Possible?” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Caries Boix and Susan C. Stokes. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam, José Antonio Cheibub, Fernando Limongi, and Michael E. Alvarez. 2000. Democracy and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. 1953. From the Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani. 1998. “Democracies Pay Higher Wages.” Working Paper 6364. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi. 2002. “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development.” Unpublished.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2002. Observational Studies, 2nd edition. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, Paul R. and D.B. Rubin. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies.” Biometrika 70: 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Robert C. 1987. Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1964 [1856]. L’ancien Régime et la Révolution. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winship, Christopher and Stephen L. Morgan. 1999. “The Estimation of Causal Effects from Observational Data.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 659–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Adam Przeworski

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Przeworski, A. (2008). Identifying the Causal Effect of Political Regimes on Employment. In: Kenworthy, L., Hicks, A. (eds) Method and Substance in Macrocomparative Analysis. Research Methods Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594081_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics