Skip to main content

Resource-Poor Farmers in South India: On the Margins or Frontiers of Globalization?

  • Chapter
Book cover Globalization and the Poor in Asia

Part of the book series: Studies in Development Economics and Policy ((SDEP))

Abstract

In this chapter we examine how globalization, while providing the potential for higher overall economic growth, may often fail to improve the wellbeing of the poor. Several recent econometric studies have examined the impact of globalization on poverty using data from a wide range of countries.1 However, these studies have largely used reduced-form specifications that do not shed any light on the different pathways through which globalization affects the well-being of the poor. Thus it is not surprising that most of the current debate is focused on technical issues regarding whether, and to what extent, globalization has increased world poverty rather than on understanding how globalization affects the poor. The latter requires an analysis of the multiple pathways that different regions/countries have undertaken. The process of globalization integrates different regions, but there is a large diversity in the manner and the extent to which this integration takes place. Understanding this diversity is critical to the formulation of anti-poverty policies around the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aggarwal, R. M. (2000) ‘Possibilities and Limitations to Cooperation in Small Groups: The Case of Group Owned Wells in India’, World Development, 28 (8): 1481–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, R. M. (2005) ‘Globalization, Local Ecosystems, and the Rural Poor’, WIDER Research Paper 2005/28, UNU-WIDER, Helsinki. See also World Development (2006), 34 (8): 1405–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A. (2002) ‘Agroecology: The Science of Natural Resource Management for Poor Farmers in Marginal Environments’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 93: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. (1997) Analytical Development Economics: The Less Developed Economy Revisited (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, P. and Srivastava, P. (2005) ‘Scaling-up Micro-Finance for India’s Rural Poor’, Policy Research Working Paper 3646, World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. (1988) ‘Credit Markets and Interlinked Transactions’, in H. B. Chenery and T. N. Srinivasan (eds), Handbook of Development Economics (Amsterdam: North- Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. and Srinivasan, T. N. (2002) ‘Trade and Poverty in the Poor Countries’, AEA Papers and Proceedings, 92 (2): 180–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Institute of Cotton Research (CICR) (1998) Annual Report (Nagpur: CICR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Environmental Studies (CES) (1998) Gathering Agrarian Crisis: Farmers’ Suicides in Warangal District (Warangal: Centre for Environmental Studies). Available at: www.artsci.wustl.edu/~stone/suicide.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., and M. Ravallion (2000) ‘How Did the World’s Poorest Fare in the 1990s?’, Development Research Group Working Paper 2409, World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D. and Kraay, A. (2001) ‘Trade, Growth and Poverty’, Development Research Group Working Paper 2615, World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist, The (2000) 356 (8186) (2 September): 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangopadhyay, S. and Sengupta, K. (1987) ‘Small Farmers, Moneylenders and Trading Activity’, Oxford Economic Papers, 39 (3): 333–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, J. (2004) ‘Detoxifying the Villages’, Macroscan, 27 October. Available at: www.macroscan.com/the/food/oct04/fod271004Detoxifying_Villages.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoAP (Government of Andhra Pradesh) (2003) Statistical Abstract of Andhra Pradesh (Hyderabad: GoAP Directorate of Economics and Statistics).

    Google Scholar 

  • GoAP (Government of Andhra Pradesh) (2005) Report of the Commission on Farmers’ Welfare (Hyderabad: GoAP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (GoI) (2004) Agricultural Statistics at a Glance (New Delhi: Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, GoI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, A. and Kelley, T. (1999) Trade Liberalization and Indian Agriculture (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. (ed.) (2006) Globalization and Poverty, National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, R. and Gulati, A. (2003) ‘Policy Reform and Farm Sector Adjustment in India’, Mimeo, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. Available at: http://agadjust.aers.psu.edu/Workshop_files/Landes-Gulati.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V. (2004) ‘Deregulating Rural Credit’, Seminar, 541. Available at: www.india-seminar.com/2004/541.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, R. (2004) ‘Putting Away the Toxic Spray’, India Together, 4 June. Available at: www.indiatogether.org/2004/jun/env-warangal.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murshed, S. M. (2002) Globalization, Marginalization and Development (London: Routledge for UNU-WIDER).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Farmers (NCF) (2006) Jai Kisan: A Draft National Policy for Farmers: Fourth Report (New Delhi: National Commission on Farmers). Available at: http://www.kisanayog.gov.in.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) (2005a) ‘Some Aspects of Farming: Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers’, 59th Round, Report 496. (New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GoI).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) (2005b) ‘Indebtedness of Farmer Households: Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers’, 59th Round, Report 498 (New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GoI).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) (2005c) ‘Access to Modern Technology for Farming: Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers’, 59th Round, Report 499 (New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GoI).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) (2005d) ‘Household Assets and Liabilities in India, Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers’, 59th Round, Report 500 (New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GoI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panikar, P. G. K. (1963) ‘The Burden of Debt in Indian Agriculture’, Journal of Farm Economics, 45 (1): 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P. N. and Suri, K. C. (2006) ‘Dimensions of Agrarian Distress in Andhra Pradesh’, Economic and Political Weekly, 22 April: 1546–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, A. (2002) ‘Foreword’, in S. M. Murshed (ed.), Globalization, Marginalization and Development (London: Routledge for UNU-WIDER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. B, Kumar, P. and Woodhead, T. (2002) ‘Smallholder Farmers in India: Food Security and Agricultural Policy’, RAP publication 2002/2003 (Bangkok: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. and Sagar, V. (2004) ‘Agricultural Credit in India’, in Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India (ed.), State of the Indian Farmer: A Millennium Study, vol. 7 (New Delhi: Academic Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamsi, V. (2004) ‘Immiserizing Growth and Anomalous Supply Response: A South Indian Economy under Globalization’, Mimeo, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venugopal, P. (2004) ‘Input Management’, in Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India (ed.), State of the Indian Farmer: A Millennium Study, 8 (New Delhi: Academic Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidyasagar, R. M. and Chandra, K. S. (2004) ‘Debt Trap or Suicide Trap?’, Crosscurrents, June. Available at: www.crosscurrents.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, L. A., McCulloch, N. and McKay, A. (2004) ‘Trade Liberalization and Poverty: the Evidence So Far’, Journal of Economic Literature, Xlii (March): 72–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2001) ‘Impact of Electric Power Sector Reforms on Agriculture in India’, Mimeo, South Asia Energy Division, World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 United Nations University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aggarwal, R.M. (2008). Resource-Poor Farmers in South India: On the Margins or Frontiers of Globalization?. In: Nissanke, M., Thorbecke, E. (eds) Globalization and the Poor in Asia. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594005_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics