Abstract
Performance is considered to stand at the very heart of modern public management efforts aiming at the improvement of public sector productivity and quality. Notwithstanding the often presumed modernity, performance improvement is really a venerable topic; the roots stretching back in time to the beginnings of modern government and the study of public administration. In its most essential meaning, performance relates to actions taken as a response to a particular demand more or less resulting in the accomplishment of a particular task or tasks. This response contains both a collective (or more precisely formulated: organizational) and an individual component. Often linked to performance are appraisal of results and efforts. This appraisal (and the mechanisms through which this is accomplished) is often what performance discussions concentrate on, and the closely related concepts of accountability and responsibility are crucial components in this evaluative process. Given the diverse set of values involved in assessing the results of public sector activity, appraisal has become a compound and complex activity in which various routes can be taken or mechanisms utilized (as explained below). In this chapter, I analyse the role that the civil service plays in this process. Traditionally the role of the civil service has been considered from a constitutional-legal perspective and so evaluated as somewhat peripheral.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aberbach, Joel D. and Bert A. Rockman, Reinventing government or reinventing politics? In B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre (ed.), Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform (London: Routledge, 2001).
Behn, R.D., Rethinking democratic accountability (Washington DC: Brookings Institute, 2001).
Bekke, Hans A.G.M., James L. Perry and Theo A.J. Toonen, Introduction: conceptualizing civil service systems. In Hans A.G.M. Bekke, James L. Perry and Theo A.J. Toonen (eds), Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996).
Bovens, Mark, Public accountability. In Ewan, Ferlie Laurence Lynn Jr and Christopher Pollitt (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
Bruijn, Hans de, Managing Performance in the Public Sector (London and New York: Routledge, 2002).
Denhardt, Robert B., Theories of public organizations (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2004).
Dwiveldi, O.P., John Halligan, The Canadian public service: balancing values and management. In John Halligan (ed.), Civil Service Systems in Anglo-American Countries (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003), pp. 148–73.
Finer, Herman, Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government. In F.E. Gourke (ed.), Bureaucratic Power in National Politics (Boston: Oxford University Press, 1978).
Friedrich, C.J., Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility. In F.E. Gourke (ed.), Bureaucratic Power in National Politics (Boston: Oxford University Press, 1978).
Halligan, John, Civil Service Systems in Anglo-American Countries (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003).
Harmon, Michael N., Responsibility as Paradox. A Critique of Rational Discourse on Government (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995).
Hood, Christopher, ‘A Public Management for all Seasons’, Public Administration (UK), 69(1), 3–19.
Ingraham, Patricia W. and Donald P. Moynihan, Civil Service and Administrative Reform in the United States. In John Halligan (ed.), Civil Service Systems in Anglo-American Countries (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003).
Kiser, L. and E. Ostrom, The Three Worlds of Action. A Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches. In Strategies of Political inquiry (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982).
Mosher, Frederick, Democracy and the Public Service (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968).
Pollitt, Christopher and Geert Bouckaert, Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis (2nd edn, Oxford: 2004).
Rohr, John, Ethics for Bureaucrats (New York: Dekker, 1978).
Self, Peter, Administrative Theories and Politics (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1972).
Suleiman, Ezra N., Dismantling Democratic States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003).
Yates, Douglas T., Hard Choices: Justifying Bureaucratic Decisions. In Joel L. Fleishmann, Lance Liebman and Mark H. Moore (eds), Public Duties: The Moral Obligations of Government officials (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981), pp. 32–51.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Gerrit S.A. Dijkstra
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dijkstra, G.S.A. (2007). Civil Service Systems and Responsibility, Accountability and Performance: A Multi-dimensional Approach. In: Raadschelders, J.C.N., Toonen, T.A.J., Van der Meer, F.M. (eds) The Civil Service in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593084_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593084_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54620-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59308-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)