Skip to main content

Linguistic Human Rights in Education: International Case Studies

  • Chapter
Language, Power and Identity Politics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Minority Languages and Communities ((PSMLC))

  • 429 Accesses

Abstract

Across the globe, there is a perceptible shift in the analysis of the form, teaching and use of the English language. Against the notion of the ‘linguistic imperialism’ of British and American English (Phillipson 1992), the development of bilingualism and English as an International Language (EIL), which allows the inclusion of varieties of English and recognises the contribution of non-native speaker teachers, is beginning to form a counteroffensive. In addition, the growth of English has not continued at the predicted pace. The television news channel CNN has failed to reach a mass market and has had to produce different editions of news programmes in different languages because English has not spread as far as the corporation had believed or expected (Morley and Robins 1995). At the same time, there is an increasing acknowledgement of the linguistic and cultural rights of communities. In 1996, the Universal Declaration of Linguistic Rights was approved by 220 people from almost 90 states worldwide. In Article 24, it states that all language communities have the right to decide to what extent their first language is to be used or studied at all levels of their educational system (www.linguistic-declaration.org).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, N. (2000) ‘Language Policy and Planning in South Africa: Some Insights’, in R. Phillipson ed. Rights to Language: Equity, Power and Education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., pp. 170–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcelo, A. A. (1990) ‘The Role of Language in Philippine Society’, Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), pp. 51–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, A. B. I. (2004) ‘McKinley’s Questionable Bequest: over 100 Years of English in Philippine Education’, World Englishes, 23(1), pp. 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Oxford: Polity Press with Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigham and Castillo (1999) Language Policy Formulation in the Philippines: Technical Background Paper, 6. Philippine Manila: Educational Sector Study, Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock-Utne, B. (2000) ‘Education for All-In Whose Language?’, in R. Phillipson ed. Rights to Language: Equity, Power and Education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., pp. 239–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brutt-Griffler, J. (2002) World English: A Study of Its Development. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M. (1998) ‘Cultural Identities in Multilingual Classrooms’, in J. and F. Genesee eds, Beyond Bilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmen, R. (2004) Desarrollo Autónomo. Heredia: EUNA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dendrinos, B. (2001) ‘The Pedagogic Discourse of EFL and the Discoursive Construction of the NS’s Professional Value’. Paper Presented at the International Conference on Non-Native Speaking Teachers in Foreign Language Teaching, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Varennes, F. (1999) ‘The Existing Rights of Minorities in International Law’, in M. Kontra, R. Phillipson, T. Skutnabb-Kangas and T. Várady eds, Language: A Right and a Resource. Budapest: Central European Press, pp. 117–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirección Nacional de Educación Bilingüe Intercultural (DINEBI) (2002) Programa Nacional de Lenguas y Culturas en la Educación. Lima: Ministerio de Educación.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti, A. (1997) Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, A. (1996) ‘Bilingual Communities: National/Regional Profiles and Urban Repertoires’, in Bautista, M. ed., Readings in Philippine Sociolinguistics. Manila: De La Salle University Press, pp. 38–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graddol, D. (1997) The Future of English? A Guide to Forecasting the Popularity of the English Language in the 21st Century. London: The British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graddol, D. (1999) ‘The Decline of the Native Speaker’, AILA Review, 13, pp. 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heugh, K. (2000) ‘Giving Good Weight to Multilingualism in South Africa’, in R. Phillipson ed., Rights to Language: Equity, Power and Education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., pp. 234–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoijer, H. (1953) ‘The Relation of Language to Culture’, in A. Kroeber ed., Anthropology Today. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 554–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontra, M., Phillipson, R., Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Várady, T. (1999) ‘Conceptualising and Implementing Linguistic Human Rights’, in M. Kontra, R. Phillipson, T. Skutnabb-Kangas and T. Várady eds, Language: A Right and a Resource. Budapest: Central European Press, pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llurda, E. (2004) ‘Non-native Speaker Teachers and English as an International Language’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 314–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay Lee, S. (2002) Teaching English as an International Language: Rethinking Goals and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D. and Robins, K. (1995) Spaces of Identity: Global Media, Electronic Landscapes and Cultural Boundaries. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mühlhäusler, P. (1996) Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Rim. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mühlhäusler, P. (2000) Language Planning and Language Ecology, Current Issues in Language Planning, 1(3), 306–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz Villalobos, V. (2005) Annual Report 2005. UN Economic and Social Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niño-Murcia, M. (2003) ‘“English is like the Dollar”: Hard Currency Ideology and the Status of English in Peru’, World Englishes, 22(2), 121–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakir, A. (1991) ‘The Range and Depth of English-Knowing Bilinguals in Singapore’, in World Englishes, 10, 167–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (1998) ‘Globalising English: Are Linguistic Human Rights an Alternative to Linguistic Imperialism?’, in P. Benson, P. Grundy, and T. Skutnabb-Kangas eds, Language Sciences, 20(1), 101–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (1992) Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PNUD Peru (Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo [in English: UNDP]) (2005) Hagamos de la Competitividad una Oportunidad para Todos. Lima: PNUD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rannut, M. (1999) ‘The Common Language Problem’, in M. Kontra, R. Phillipson, T. Skutnabb-Kangas and T. Varady eds, Language: A Right and a Resource. Budapest: Central European Press, pp. 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville, J. (2002) ‘Language and Equity: A Development Perspective’, in U. Kockel ed., Culture and Economy: Contemporary Perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibayan, B. (2000) ‘Resulting Patterns of Sociolinguistic, Socioeconomic and Cultural Practice and Behavior After More than Four Hundred Years of Language Policy and Practice in the Philippines’, in M. Bautista, T. Llamzon and B. Sibayan eds, Parangal can Brother Andrew: Festschrift for Andrew Gonzales on his Sixtieth Birthday. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Phillipines, pp. 247–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1999) ‘Linguistic Diversity, Human Rights and the “Free” Market’, in M. Kontra, R. Phillipson, T. Skutnabb-Kangas and T. Várady eds, Language: A Right and a Resource. Budapest: Central European Press, pp. 187–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Phillipson, R. eds (1994) Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolicz, J. and Nical, I. (1997) ‘Exporting the European Idea of National Language: Some Educational Implications of the Use of English and Indigenous Languages in the Philippines’, International Review of Education, 43(5–6), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolicz, J. and Secombe, M. (2000) ‘Language Resilience and Educational Empowerment’, in R. Phillipson ed., Rights to Language. Equity, Power and Education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., pp. 164–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, C. (2001) ‘African Mother-tongue Programmes and the Politics of Language: Linguistic Citizenship Versus Linguistic Human Rights’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 22(4), 339–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. (1991) Planning Language, Planning Inequality. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. (1995) Power and Inequality in Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaševski, K. (1996) ‘International Prospects for the Future of the Welfare State’, in Reconceptualising the Welfare State. Copenhagen: The Danish Centre for Human Rights, pp. 100–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaševski, K. (2004) Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The Right to Education. Mission to Colombia, 1–10 October 2003. UN Economic and Social Council, Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tupas, T. (2001) ‘Linguistic Imperialism in the Philippines: Reflections of an English Language Teacher of Filipino Overseas Workers’, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 10(1), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Board (2004) Human Development Report. Cultural Liberty in Today’s Diverse World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, V. (2002) ‘English as a Second Language in South Africa’s Tertiary Institutions: A Case Study at the University of Pretoria’, World Englishes, 21(1), 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widdowson, H. (1998) ‘Context, Community, and Authentic Language’, TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 705–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Websites

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Jane Saville

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saville, J. (2007). Linguistic Human Rights in Education: International Case Studies. In: Craith, M.N. (eds) Language, Power and Identity Politics. Palgrave Studies in Minority Languages and Communities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592841_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics