Abstract
Cohen and Fung (2004) point to the recent resurgence of ‘radical democratic’ thought and politics that they have contributed to through their scholarly work and political activism. This has arisen, they argue, in response to the inability of national governments to govern effectively, especially so in a global age that has reduced national economic sovereignty, and to the increasingly obvious chasm between citizens and their representatives in ‘conventional’ democracies, reflected in reductions in memberships of political parties, voting at national and local elections, and so on. Calls for radical democratic change also clearly have a global dimension. Democracy ought to be both deeper and broader. Issues such as poverty, the uneven impact of environmental change, working conditions in poorer economies, and access to healthcare have animated activists to develop transnational social movements and networks and to call for the extension of democracy beyond the confines of the nation-state.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Citations
Albrecht, S. (2006). Whose voice is heard in online deliberation? Information, Communication and Society, 9 (1), 62–82.
Breshahan, T., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labour: Firm level evidence. Retrieved 24 August 2006 from http://ebusiness.mit.edu/erik/ITW-final.pdf.
Carroll, W., & Hackett, R. (2006). Democratic media activism through the lens of social movement theory. Media, Culture and Society, 28(1), 83–104.
Cline, W. (1997). Trade and income distribution. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Cohen, J., & Fung, A. (2004). Radical democracy. Retrieved 24 August 2006 from http://www.archonfung.net/papers/Cohen_Fung_Debate_SPSR2004.pdf.
Coleman, S. (2004). Connecting parliament to the public via the Internet. Information, Communication and Society, 7 (1), 1–22.
Dahlberg, L. (2005). The corporate colonization of online attention and the marginalization of critical communication. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 29 (2), 1–21.
Dahlberg, L. (forthcoming). Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: From consensus to contestation, New Media & Society.
De Santis, R. (2003). Wage inequality in the United Kingdom: Trade and/or technology? World Economy, 26, 893–909.
Dutton, W.H., di Gennaro, C., & Millwood Hargrave, A. (2005). The Internet in Britain: The Oxford Internet survey May 2005. Retrieved 1 May 2005 from http://www.oii.ox.ac.ukresearch/oxis/OxIS_2005_Internet_Survey.pdf.
Ferguson, R., & Howell, M. (2004). Political blogs: Craze or convention? Hansard Society. Retrieved from http://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/assets/Final_Blog_Report.pdf.
Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Reflections on the postsocialist condition. London: Routledge.
Fung, A., & Wright, E. (2003). The real utopias project: Deepening democracy — Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1), (Trans. T. McCarthy). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (Vol. 2), (Trans. T. McCarthy). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere (Trans. T. Burger). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms (Trans. W. Rehg). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Office of National Statistics (2004). Focus on social inequalities. Retrieved 24 August 2006 from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/socineg1204.pdf.
Pickard, V. (2006). Assessing the radical democracy of Indymedia: Discursive, technical, and institutional constructions. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23 (1), 19–38.
Sunstein, C. (2001). http://Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Van Alstyne, M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2005). Global village or cyberbalkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Retrieved 24 August 2006 from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=756445.
Williams, R (1961). The long revolution. London: Chatto and Windus.
Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Public Culture, 14 (1), 49–90.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 John Downey
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Downey, J. (2007). Participation and/or Deliberation? The Internet as a Tool for Achieving Radical Democratic Aims. In: Dahlberg, L., Siapera, E. (eds) Radical Democracy and the Internet. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592469_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592469_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28315-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59246-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)