Abstract
‘Democracy’ has become a universal signifier of political legitimacy. No major political programme or regime wants to be labelled undemocratic. However, the success of this signifier has far exceeded the success of actual democratic practice. Political systems throughout the world, including really existing democratic systems, are plagued by corruption, non-transparent decision-making processes, hierarchical power distribution, corporate influence over government and information flows, cynical public relations and consultation exercises, capitalist globalization, neo-imperialist coercion, and reactionary fundamentalisms. Moreover, the signifier ‘democracy’ has been used to legitimate all manner of antidemocratic actions, including state and private surveillance, harassment and silencing of critical voices, detentions without trial, neo-liberal policies, global corporate expansion, and outright neo-imperialist invasions and war. When these political conditions are combined with an ever-expanding consumer culture that promises private solutions to social problems, it is not surprising that many of the global middle classes, including those in so-called advanced democratic nations, are more interested in consumption than in politics. Meanwhile, for those trapped in grinding poverty, precarious labour, and existential uncertainty, the lack of time, energy, and resources clearly explains an absence of participation in democratic processes and a turn to otherworldly fundamentalist religions (Davis, 2004).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Citations
Aristotle. (1988). The politics (Trans. B. Jowett and J. Barnes). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barlow, J. P. (1996). A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. Retrieved 23 August 2006 from http://homes.eff.org/-barlow/Declaration-Final.html.
Barney, D. (2000). Prometheus wired: The hope for democracy in the age of network technology. Sydney: UNSW Press.
Bauman, Z. (2002). Society under siege. Cambridge: Polity.
Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boggs, C. (2000). The end of politics: Corporate power and the decline of the public sphere. New York: Guilford Press.
Castoriadis, C. (1991). Philosophy, politics, autonomy (Trans. D. Ames Curtis). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castoriadis, C. (1997). The imaginary institution of society (Trans. K. Blarney). Cambridge: Polity.
Curran, J. (2000). Rethinking media and democracy. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 120–54). London: Arnold.
Dahlberg, L. (2005). The corporate colonization of online attention and the marginalization of critical communication? Journal of Communication Inquiry, 29 (2), 1–21.
Davis, R. (1999). The web of politics: The Internet’s impact on the American political system. New York: Oxford University Press.
Davis, M. (2004). Planet of Slums. New Left Review, 26 (March-April), 5–34.
Dyson, E., Gilder, G., Keyworth, G. & Toffler, A. (1994). A Magna Carta for the knowledge age. Retrieved 23 August 2006 from http://www.pff.org//issuespubs/futureinsights/fil.2magnacarta.html.
Fortier, E (2001). Virtuality check. London: Verso.
Gandy, O. (2002). The real digital divide: Citizens versus consumers. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 448–60). London: Sage.
Gates, B. (1999). Business @ the speed of thought: Using a digital nervous system. New York: Warner Books.
Grossman, L. K. (1995). The electronic republic. New York: Viking/Penguin.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (Trans. W. Rehg). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Pengu in Press.
Hauben, M. & Hauben, R. (1997). Netizens: On the history and impact of Usenet and the Internet. Los Alamitos, CA. IEEE Computer Society.
Kahn, R. & Kellner, D. (2005). Oppositional politics and the Internet: a critical/reconstructiveapproach. Cultural Politics: An International Journal, 1 (1), 7–100.
Kapor, M. (1993). Where is the digital highway really going? Wired, 1(03), 53–59, 84.
Kellner, D. (2004). The media and the crises of democracy in the age of Bush-2. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1 (1), 29–58.
Keyworth, G. A. (1997). Progress and Freedom Foundation. People and Society in Cyberspace, the Shape of Things: Exploring the Evolving Transformation of American Life. Retrieved 15 December 2002 from http://www.pff.org/tsot-1.html.
Laclau, E. & Mouffe C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.
Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (1987). Post-marxism without apologies. New Left Review, I (166), 79–106.
Lefort, C. (1986). Democracy and political theory (Trans. D. Macey). Cambridge: Polity Press.
McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
McChesney, R. W. (2002). The Titanic sails on: Why the Internet won’t sink the media giants. In G. Dines & J. Humez (Eds.), Gender, race and class in media (pp. 667–83). London: Sage.
Mouffe, C. (2000a). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
Mouffe, C. (2000b). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Political Science Series Number 72. Retrieved 10 January 2006 from http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_72.pdf.
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Routledge.
Napoli, P. M. (1998). The Internet and the forces of ‘massification’. Electronic Journal of Communication, 8(2). Retrieved 23 August 2006 from http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v8n298.htm.
Negri, A. (1999). Insurgencies: Constituent power and the modern state (Trans. M. Boscagli). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4 (1), 9–27.
Resnick, D. & Margolis, M. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace ‘revolution’. London: Sage.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community, homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Schiller, D. (1999). Networking the global market system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Toffler, A. & Toffler, H. (1994). Creating a new civilization: The politics of the third wave. Atlanta, GA: Turner Pub.
Virno, P. & Hardt, M. (Ed.) (1996). Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Lincoln Dahlberg and Eugenia Siapera
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dahlberg, L., Siapera, E. (2007). Introduction: Tracing Radical Democracy and the Internet. In: Dahlberg, L., Siapera, E. (eds) Radical Democracy and the Internet. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592469_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592469_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28315-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59246-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)