Abstract
There is no shortage of explanations for the series of crises that engulfed East Asia in 1997–1998. While there is no easy way to group up the various interpretations of what is now widely referred to as the ‘Asian financial crisis (AFC)’, three theories stand out. To many mainstream economists, the crisis represented a typical ‘twin’ financial crash, a dangerous cocktail of information asymmetries, financial market failures and, crucially, inept government interference in the workings of the markets. The Asian model of state dirigisme has proved deficient, prone to inherent cronyism and corruption. In essence therefore, the Asian financial crisis of 1997–1998 was a crisis, as a World Bank report concludes, of crony capitalism:
[t]he interaction of these institutional weaknesses with international capital markets imperfections, and the use of inconsistent macroeconomic policies to manage surging capital inflows generated crucial vulnerabilities that laid the groundwork for the subsequent financial crises — and ensured that their consequences would be severe (World Bank 1998/99: 57).
I am indebted to Virot Ali for his research help and expertise on East Asia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Anastasia Nesvetailova
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nesvetailova, A. (2007). The East Asian Crisis: A Minskyan View. In: Fragile Finance. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592308_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592308_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28272-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59230-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)