Abstract
As the Chinese diasporic communities expanded throughout the world with the settling down of migrants as permanent residents or citizens of the nation state, a sojourner’s mentality soon gives way to a sense of permanence, marking the transition from migrant to becoming a fully fledged member of the host society. In this sense, Georg Simmel’s stranger finds home, fashioned from two worlds, similar yet disparate. As such, the diasporic communities take root in a land away from the original home. The extent to which the diasporic communities become fully integrated into the host society will allow us to understand the process — and success — of nation-building and citizenship development in a world where nation states are becoming increasingly multicultural and pluralistic in orientation. It is also a world where multiculturalism is becoming progressively more problematic as cultural identities confront the dictates of the nation state and dominant social groups. The presence of diasporic communities thus reveals the intense interchange of community and nation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, A. and Knowles, C. (eds) 2005, Making Race Matter: Bodies, Space and Identity, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Alexander, M. 2003, ‘Local Policies toward Migrants as an Expression of Host—Stranger Relations: a Proposed Typology’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 411–30.
Anderson, B. 1991, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, revised and extended edn, Verso Books, London.
Anthias, F. 1998, ‘Evaluating “Diaspora”: beyond Ethnicity’, Sociology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 557–81.
Anthias, F. 2001a, ‘The Material and the Symbolic in Theorizing Social Stratification: Issues of Gender, Ethnicity and Class’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 367–90.
Anthias, F. 2001b, ‘New Hybridities, Old Concepts: the Limits of “Culture”’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 619–41.
Bhabha, H. 1990, Nation and Narration, Routledge, London.
Brubaker, R. 2005, ‘The “Diaspora” Diaspora’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–19.
Cattell, M. and Climo, J. 2002, ‘Introduction: Meaning in Social Memory: Anthropological Perspectives’, in J. Climo and M. Cattell (eds), Social Memory and History: Anthropological Perspectives, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, pp. 1–38.
Clifford, J. 1997, ‘Diasporas’, in J. Clifford (ed.), Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, pp. 244–77.
Dunn, R. 1998, Identity Crisis: a Social Critique of Postmodernity, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Gilroy, P. 1993, The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, London.
Halbwachs, M. 1992, On Collective Memory, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Heinke, J. n.d., Georg Simmel, Strangeness, and the Stranger, viewed 14 Nov. 2006 <http://www.postcolonialweb.org/australia/malouf/jh2.html>.
Koopmans, R., Straham, P., Giugni, M. and Passy, F. 2005, Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Diversity in Europe, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Kuah-Pearce, K.E. 2006, ‘Transnational Self in the Chinese Diaspora: a Conceptual Framework’, Asian Studies Review, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 223–39.
Mageo, J.M. (ed.) 2001, Cultural Memory: Reconfiguring History and Identity in the Postcolonial Pacific, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.
Mudrooroo, N. 1990, Writing from the Fringe: a Study of Modern Aboriginal Literature, Hyland House, Melbourne.
Poulantzas, N. 1975, Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, trans. D. Fernbach, NLB, London.
Song, M. 2005, ‘Global and Local Articulations of Asian Identity’, in A. Alexander and C. Knowles (eds), Making Race Matter: Bodies, Space and Identity, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 60–75.
Stratton, J. and Ang, I. 1994, ‘Multicultural Imagined Communities: Cultural Difference and National Identity in Australia and the USA’, Continuum: the Australian Journal of Media and Culture, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 124–58 < http://www.mcc.murdoch.edu.au/ReadingRoom/8.2/Stratton.html > .
Werbner, P. and Modood, T. 1997, Debating Cultural Hybridity: Multi-Cultural Identities and the Politics of Anti-Racism, Zed Press, London.
Wright, N. 1985, Classes, Verso, London.
Yelvington, K. 2002, ‘History, Memory and Identity: a Programmatic Prolegomenon’, Critique of Anthropology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 227–56.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Andrew P. Davidson and Kuah-Pearce Khun Eng
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davidson, A.P., Eng, KP.K. (2008). Introduction: Diasporic Memories and Identities. In: Eng, KP.K., Davidson, A.P. (eds) At Home in the Chinese Diaspora. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591622_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591622_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35330-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59162-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)