Abstract
The warp and weft of this book so far has concerned processes of state restructuring and welfare state retrenchment taking place within the borders of the United Kingdom. Yet globalization is never far away: as Janet Newman suggests in her chapter, current UK reforms are often justified as common-sense decisions by contextualizing them as the natural response to a particular version of history with ‘consequences for the inevitable emergence of new (often globalizing) realities’.1The UK occupies an almost paradoxical position in this respect. On the one hand, the Thatcher administration is frequently cast as the progenitor of early neoliberal reforms that have since travelled well beyond UK borders, as have the more hybrid forms of new governance that New Labour has crafted in the wake of the Thatcher administration. Yet at the same time, government officials during the same period have all too often justified their policy choices as driven by external pressures that necessitate state restructuring and welfare state retrenchment. Globalization, in the diffuse sphere of political legitimation, is everywhere and nowhere at the same time: catalysed by UK politicians, yet encompassing and shaping UK politicians’ choices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
D. Harvey, A Brief History ofNeoliberalism(Oxford, 2006).
J. G. Valdés, Pinochet’s Economists: The Chicago School of Economics in Chile(Cambridge, 1995).
J. Kelsey, Economic Fundamentalism: A World Model for Structural Adjustment(London, 1996).
O. Williamson, ‘Transaction-cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations’, Journal of Law and Economics22 (1979), pp. 233–61;
D. Osborne and T. Baebler, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector(Reading, MA, 1992).
D. Richards and M. Smith, Governance and Public Policy in the UK(Oxford, 2002);
R. Rhodes, Understanding Governance(Buckingham, 1997);
R. Rhodes (ed.) Transforming British Government, 2 vols. (London, 2000);
G. Stoker, Transforming Local Governance(Basingstoke, 2004).
J. Braithwaite, ‘Responsive Regulation and Developing Economies’ in N. Woods (ed.) Making Corporate Self-Regulation Effective in Developing Countries(Oxford, 2007).
P. Cammack, ‘The Governance of Global Capitalism: A New Materialist Perspective’, Historical Materialism, 11 (2) (2003), pp. 37–59;
K. Jayasuriya, Statecraft, Welfare and the Politics of Inclusion(Basingstoke, 2006).
L. W. Kimathi, ‘Non-State Institutions as a Basis of State Reconstruction: The Case of Justice Systems in Africa’, paper presented at the 2006 Law and Society Summer Institute, Johannesburg, July 2006, available at: http://www.lawandsocietysummerinstitutes.org/workshop06/participants/leah.htm/workshop06/participants/leah.htm.
See also P. Englebert, State Legitimacy and Development in Africa(London, 2000);
G. Hyden, D. Olowu, W. O. Hastings and O. Ogendo (eds) African Perspectives on Governance(Trenton, NJ, 1998); and on Asia:
T. Ginsburg, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases(Cambridge, 2004);
B. Harriss-White, Agricultural Markets from Theory to Practice (Basingstoke, 1999);
R. D’Souza, ‘The “Third World” and Socio-legal Studies: Neo-liberalism and Lessons from India’s Legal Innovations’ Social and Legal Studies14 (2005), pp. 487–513.
D. Olowu and J. Erero (eds) Indigenous Governance Systems in Nigeria(Ile-Ife, Nigeria, 1996).
J. Newman, Chapter 3 in this volume, citing C. Knowles, ‘Cultural Perspectives in Welfare Regimes’, in P. Chamberlayne, A. Cooper, R. Freeman and M. Rustin (eds) Welfare and Culture in Europe: Towards a New Paradigm in Social Policy(London, 1999), pp. 240–54.
Barnett argues that a ‘bottom up’ approach to he study of neoliberal governance ‘might help explain how the rhythms of the everyday are able to produce effects on macro-scale processes and vice versa’: C. Barnett, ‘The Consolations of Neo-liberalism’, Geoforum36 (2005), pp. 7–12 at p. 11.
C. Harrington and B. Yngvesson, ‘Interpretive Sociolegal Research’, Law and Social Inquiry15(1) (1990), pp. 135–48;
A. Sarat, ‘Off to Meet the Wizard: Beyond Validity and Reliability in the Search for a Post-empiricist Sociology of Law’, Law and Social Inquiry15(1) (1990), pp. 155–70;
P. Fitzpatrick, ‘Distant Relations: The New Constructionism in Critical and Socio-Legal Studies’, in P. Thomas (ed.) Sociolegal Studies(Aldershot, 1997);
A. Hunt, Alan, Explorations in Law and Society: Toward a Constitutive Theory of Law(New York, 1993);
D. Cooper. Governing out of Order: Space, Law and the Politics of Belonging(Rivers Oram, NY, 1998).
S. Merry, ‘Constructing a Global Law — Violence against Women and the Human Rights System’, Law and Social Inquiry28(4) (2003), pp. 941–77 (gender and human rights in international law);
B. Yngvesson, ‘Placing the Gift Child in Transnational Adoption’, Law and Society Review, 36(2), 2002, pp. 227–56 (international adoptions);
S. Coutin, B. Maurer and B. Yyngvesson, ‘In the Mirror: The Legitimation Work of Globalization’, Law and Social Inquiry, 27(2) (2002), pp. 801–43 (comparing adoption, immigration and global financial services research with particular attention to methodological issues);
R. D’Souza, ‘The “Third World” and Socio-legal Studies: Neo-liberalism and Lessons from India’s Legal Innovations’ Social and Legal Studies14 (2005), pp. 487–513 (public interest litigation in India analysed through the lens of the transnational effects of colonial relations);
B. Morgan, ‘Emerging Global Water Welfarism: Access to Water, Unruly Consumers and Transnational Governance’, in F. Trentmann and J. Brewer (eds) Consumer Cultures, Global Perspectives: Historical Trajectories, Transnational Exchanges(Oxford and New York, 2006), pp. 279–310; and
B. Morgan, ‘Consuming without Paying: Stealing or Campaigning? The Civic Implications of Civil Disobedience around Access to Water’, in K. Soper and F. Trentmann (eds) Citizenship and Consumption(Basingstoke, 2007) (advocacy coalitions and networks of professionals engaged in struggles around access to water also engage in practices of insurgent political consumerism and technocratic citizenship that confound nationally-embedded spatial assumptions).
A. Riles, The Network Inside Out(Michigan, 2001);
A. Griffiths, F. and K. von Benda-Beckmann (eds) Mobile People, Mobile Law: Expanding Legal Relations in a Contracting World(Aldershot, UK, 2005);
A. Apparudai, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalisation(Minneapolis and London, 1996); R. State and G. Dahl (eds) Globalization, Creolization and Cultural Complexity: Essays in Honour of Ulf Hannerz, Special Issue of Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 3(3) (2003).
W. Lamer and W. Walters (eds) Global Governmentality(London, 2004);
W. Larner, ‘Neo-liberalism: Policy, Ideology, Governmentality’, Studies in Political Economy, 63 (2000), pp. 5–25; C. Barnett, P. Cloke, N. Clarke and A. Malpass, ‘Consuming Ethics: Articulating the Subjects and Spaces of Ethical Consumption’, Antipode, 37(1) (2005);
E. ‘Swyngedouw, with P. Getimis, H. Heinelt, G. Kafkalas, and R. Smith (eds) Participatory Governance in Multi-Level Context: Concepts and Experience(Opladen, 2002).
M. Goldman, Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in the Age of Globalisation(New Haven, 2006).
For example, J. Williams, ‘Private Legal Orders: Professional Markets and the Commodification of Financial Governance’, Social and Legal Studies15 (2006), pp. 209–36 (exploring how forensic corporate investigators influence corporate governance but citing a much wider literature on networks).
J. Braithwaite and P. Drahos, Global Business Regulation(Cambridge, 2000) (how actors create global webs of influence in business regulation in fourteen different policy areas);
M. Keck and K. Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics(Ithaca, 1998) (how transnational advocacy networks influence human rights policies);
B. Garth and Y. Dezalay, The Internationalisation of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States(Chicago, 2002) (how lawyers and economists shape political economy and governance strategies).
J. Freeman, ‘Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State’, University of California at Los Angeles Law Review 45 (1997), pp. 1–98;
C. Scott, ‘Accountability in the Regulatory State’, Journal of Law and Society, 27(1) (2000), pp. 38–60;
G. Teubner (ed.) Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State(Berlin, 1986);
J. Black, ‘Proceduralizing Regulation Part I’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20 (2000), pp. 597–614.
D. Cowan and A. Marsh, ‘From Need to Choice: Welfarism to Advanced Liberalism? Problematics of Social Housing Allocation’, Legal Studies25(1) (2005), pp. 22–48;
M. Dean, Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society(Sage, 1999);
M. McDermont, ‘Territorializing Regulation: a Case Study of ‘Social Housing’ in England’, Law & Social Inquiry, 32(2) (2007), pp. 373–98;
J. Williams, ‘Private Legal Orders’; P. Vincent-Jones, The New Public Contracting: Regulation, Responsiveness, Relationality(Oxford, 2006).
A. Sarat, ‘“…The Law Is All Over”: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor’, Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities2(2) (1990), pp. 343–80.
P. Houtzager, ‘From Polycentrism to the Polity’, in P. Houtzager and M. Moore (eds) Changing Paths: International Development and the New Politics of Inclusion(Michigan, 2003).
M. Bevir et al.(eds) Traditions of Governance: History and Diversity;
D. Vogel, National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the US(Ithaca, NY, 1986);
J. Richardson (ed.) Policy Styles in Western Europe(London, 1982);
F. van Waarden, ‘Persistence of National Policy Styles’, in B. Unger and F. van Waarden (eds) Convergence or Diversity? Internationalization and Economic Policy Response(Aldershot, 1995);
M. Thatcher, ‘Winners and Losers in Europeanisation: Reforming the National Regulation of Telecommunications’, West European Politics27(2) (2004), pp. 284–309.
D. Levi-Faur, ‘Herd Behaviour and Regulators’, in J. Jordana and D. Levi-Faur (eds) The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance(Cheltenham, 2004).
P. Houtzager, A. Lavalle and A. Acharya, ‘Beyond Comparative Anecdotalism: How Civil and Political Organizations Shape Participation in Säo Paulo, Brazil’, World Development, 33(6) (2005), pp. 951–64 is an early publication in this ongoing project. See also P. Houtzager, ‘From Polycentrism to the Polity’, footnote 40.
Barnett argues that a ‘bottom up’ approach to he study of neoliberal governance ‘might help explain how the rhythms of the everyday are able to produce effects on macro-scale processes and vice versa’: Newman, C. Barnett, ‘The Consolations of Neo-liberalism’, Geoforum, 36 (2005), pp. 7–12, quotation p. 11.
M. Redclift, Chewing Gum: The Fortunes of Taste(New York, 2004);
D. Anderson and N. Carrier, ‘“Flowers of Paradise” or “Polluting the Nation”: Contested Narratives of Khat Consumption’, in J. Brewer and F. Trentmann (ed), Consuming Cultures, Global Perspectives: Historical Trajectories, Transnational Exchanges(Oxford and New York, 2006), pp. 145–66;
P. Jackson, P. Russell and N. Ward, ‘Mobilising the “Commodity Chain” Concept in the Politics of Food and Farming’, Journal of Rural Studies22 (2006), pp. 129–41;
M. Prendergast, Uncommon Grounds: The History of Coffee and How it Transformed our World(New York, 1999).
K. Litfin, Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation(New York, 1994).
J. Meyer and B. Rowan, ‘Institutionalised Organisations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, 38 (1977), pp. 340–63;
M. Finnemore, ‘Norms, Culture and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism’, International Organisation, 50(2) (1996), pp. 325–47;
M. Barnett and M. Finnemore, Rules for the World: International Organisations in Global Politics(Ithaca, 2004);
E. Boyle and J. Meyer, ‘Modern Law as a Secularized and Global Model: Implications for the Sociology of Law’, in Y. Dezalay and B. Garth (eds) Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy(Michigan, 2002).
K. Conca, Governing Water: Contentious Transnational Politics and Global Institution Building(Cambridge, MA, 2006).
G. Shaffer and K. Nicolaidis, ‘Transnational Mutual Recognition Regimes: Governance Without Global Government’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 68(3) (2005), pp. 267–322; H. Klug, ‘Hybrid(ity) Rules: Creating Local Law in a Globalized World’, in Dezalay and Garth, Global Prescriptions;A. Sinha, When David Meets Goliath: How Global Trade Rules Shape Domestic Politics in India, book manuscript in progress presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Baltimore, July 2006; A. Christian, ‘Taxing the Global Worker: Three Spheres of International Social Security Coordination’, Virginia Tax Review, 26 (2006).
Though see Merry, ‘Constructing a Global Law’ for a recent study of practices around international human rights law, exploring formal centralized institutional practices at the international level around human rights. Some commentators hope such practices will form a bulwark against the political direction of the institutions supporting trade liberalization, development assistance, and capital mobility: see for example P. Alston and M. Robinson (eds) Human Rights and Development: Towards Mutual Reinforcement(Oxford, 2005).
B. Morgan, ‘Turning Off the Tap, Urban Water Service Delivery and the Social Construction of Global Administrative Law’, European Journal of International Law, 17(1) (2006), pp. 215–47; Morgan, ‘Consuming without Paying’, footnote 31.
K. Sikkink, ‘The Transnational Dimension of the Judicialisation of Politics in Latin America’, in R. Sieder, L. Schjolden and A. Angell (eds) The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America(New York and Basingstoke, 2005).
J. Foweraker, ‘Grassroots Movements, Political Activism and Social Development in Latin America: A Critical Comparison of Chile and Brazil’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 33(4) (2001), pp. 839–65.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Bronwen Morgan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morgan, B. (2007). Conclusion: Reflections on Governance from an International Perspective. In: Bevir, M., Trentmann, F. (eds) Governance, Consumers and Citizens. Consumption and Public Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591363_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591363_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35503-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59136-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)