Abstract
Gender has long been recognised by sociologists, anthropologists, political scientists and historians (amongst others) as a crucial structure influencing the organisation of societies and the positioning of women and men in relation to both public and private divisions of power and authority. The socially constructed and culturally defined understandings of femininity and masculinity upon which the gender order1 of any society is founded, affect the roles and responsibilities attributed to women and men, both in the private sphere of home and family and in the public domains of economic, political and social interaction, and, indeed, in intersections between the two. Dominant discourses and understandings of gender, propagated through media and cultural representations of women and men, public rhetoric and popular debate, prioritise equality and difference to varying degrees, both drawing on and feeding into state-led ideologies and policies. These in turn play an important role in determining the extent to which gender impacts upon the opportunities, rights, entitlements and duties of male and female citizens. Indeed, as Connell has pointed out, the state is ‘not just a regulatory agency, it is a creative force in the dynamic of gender’, one which ‘creates new categories and new historical possibilities’.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
R. Connell, ‘The State, Gender and Sexual Politics’, Theory and Society, 19, 5 (1990): 507–44, p. 530.
M. Buckley, Women and Ideology in the Soviet Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989);
B. Evans Clements, R. Friedman and D. Healey (eds), Russian Masculinities in History and Culture (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002);
S. Gal and G. Kligman, The Politics of Gender after Socialism: a Comparative-Historical Essay (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).
See for example, S. Bridger, R. Kay and K. Pinnick, No More Heroines? Russia, Women and the Market (London: Routledge, 1996);
S. Gal and G. Kligman (eds), Reproducing Gender: Politics, Publics and Everyday Life after Socialism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000);
S. Ushakin, Muzhe(N)stvennosti. Sbornik Statei (Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2002);
R. Kay, Men in Contemporary Russia: the Fallen Heroes of Post-Soviet Change? (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).
H. Pilkington, E. Omel’chenko, M. Flynn, U. Bliudina and E. Starkova, Looking West? Cultural Globalization and Russian Youth Cultures (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004), pp. 84–9, 160–3.
D. Kalb, ‘Afterword: Globalism and Postsocialist Prospects’, in C. Hann (ed.), Postsocialism: Ideals Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia (London: Routledge, 2002), pp. 318–22.
See for example, S. Bridger and F. Pine (eds), Surviving Post-Socialism: Local Strategies and Regional Responses in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union (London: Routledge, 1998);
M. Burawoy and K. Verdery (eds), Uncertain Transition: Ehtnographies of Change in the Postsocialist World (Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999);
H. Haukanes and F. Pine (eds), Generations, Kinship and Care: Gendered Provisions of Social Security in Central Eastern Europe (Bergen: Centre for Women’s and Gender Research, University of Bergen, 2005).
Haukanes and Pine (2005); F. Pine, ‘Retreat to the Household? Gendered Domains in Postsocialist Poland’, in C. Hann (ed.), Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia (London: Routledge, 2002);
S. Salmenniemi, ‘Civic Activity — Feminine Activity? Gender, Civil Society and Citizenship in Post-Soviet Russia’, Sociology, 39, 4 (2005): 735–53;
R. Kay, ‘Grassroots Women’s Activism in Russia, 1992–96: Surviving Social Change Together?’ in M. Mikula (ed.), Women, Activism and Social Change (London: Routledge, 2005).
S. Ashwin and T. Lytkina, ‘Men in Crisis in Russia — the Role of Domestic Marginalization’, Gender and Society, 18, 2 (2004): 189–206.
R. Kay, ‘Caring for Men in Contemporary Russia: Gendered Constructions of Need and Hybrid Forms of Social Security’, Focaal, European Journal of Anthropology (forthcoming, 2007).
N. Rimashevskaia, ‘The New Women’s Studies’, in M. Buckley (ed.), Perestroika and Soviet Women (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992);
A. Posadskaya, Women in Russia: a New Era in Russian Feminism (London: Verso, 1994);
S. Pavlychko, ‘Feminism in Post-Communist Ukrainian Society’, in R. Marsh (ed.), Women in Russia and Ukraine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 310;
N. White, ‘Women in Changing Societies: Latvia and Lithuania’, in M. Buckley (ed.), Post-Soviet Women: From the Baltic to Central Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 212–14.
R. Kay, Russian Women and their Organizations: Gender, Discrimination and Grassroots Women’s Organizations 1991–96 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000);
V. Sperling, Organizing Women in Contemporary Russia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999);
K. Kuehnast and C. Nechemias (eds), Post-Soviet Women Encountering Transition: Nation Building, Economic Survival, and Civic Activism (Washington, DC and Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004).
V. Putin, Poslanie Federal’nomu Sobraniu Rossiiskoi Federatsii www.Kremlin.ru/mainpage.shtml (10 May 2006).
Buckley (1989); S. Bridger, Women in the Soviet Countryside: Women’s Roles in Rural Development in the Soviet Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987);
G. W. Lapidus, Women in Soviet Society: Equality, Development and Social Change (Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 1978);
C. Corrin, Magyar Women: Hungarian Women’s Lives, 1960s–1990s (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1994).
See for example, D. Bertaux, P. Thompson and A. Rotkirch (eds), On Living Through Soviet Russia (London: Routledge, 2004).
See for example, C. Hann and E. Dunn (eds), Civil Society: Challenging Western Models (London: Routledge, 1996).
L. Attwood, The New Soviet Man and Woman: Sex-Role Socialization in the USSR (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1990). See also chapters by Asztalos Morell and Bridger in this volume.
N. Azhgikhina ‘Russian Journalism after 2000: New Censorship, New Markets and New Communities’, Keynote Speech, BASEES Annual Conference (Cambridge, 1–3 April 2006).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Rebecca Kay
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kay, R. (2007). Introduction: Gender, Equality and the State from ‘Socialism’ to ‘Democracy’?. In: Kay, R. (eds) Gender, Equality and Difference During And After State Socialism. Studies in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590762_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590762_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35728-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59076-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)