Skip to main content

Efficiency and Productivity Change in Greek Banking: Methods and Recent Evidence

  • Chapter
Frontiers of Banks in a Global Economy

Abstract

This chapter examines the most recent developments pertaining to the efficiency and productivity of Greek banks. In this context we discuss some of the trends characterizing the Greek banking sector since the early 1990s and review the relevant empirical evidence. The Greek banking sector has recently undergone significant transformations that resulted in an extensive deregulation process and wide structural reforms. Over the 1990s the integration process in the context of the run up to the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and the increasingly competitive euro-area environment has contributed to raise banks’ concerns about their overall performance, efficiency, and productivity. As in other European countries, Greek banks have responded to these exogenous pressures with a wave of consolidation and privatization: between 1996 and 2003, 16 mergers and acquisitions took place, and seven out of ten state-owned banks were privatized (Garganas, 2003). Furthermore, banks have strived to improve their customer base by looking for new markets (e.g., in the Balkans) and providing a range of new, non-traditional products and services, such as insurance, underwriting, asset management, and so on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aigner, D. J. and S. F. Chu (1968). ‘On estimating the industry production function’, American Economic Review 58, 826–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, I. M. S. (2001). ‘A non-parametric approach for assessing productivity dynamics of large banks’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 33, 121–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altunbaş, Y. and S. P. Chakravarty (1998). ‘Efficiency measures and the banking structure in Europe’, Economic Letters 60, 205–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altunbaş, Y., J. Goddard and P. Molyneux (1999). ‘Technical change in banking’, Economic Letters64, 215–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Altunbaş, Y., E. P. M. Gardener, P. Molyneux and B. Moore (2001). ‘Efficiency in European banking’, European Economic Review 45, 1931–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apergis, N. and A. Rezitis (2004). ‘Cost structure, technological change, and productivity growth in the Greek banking sector’, International Advances in Economic Research 10(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., H. B. Chenery, B. S. Minhas and R. M. Solow (1961). ‘Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency’, Review of Economic and Statistics 43(3), 225–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanasoglou, P. P. and S. N. Brissimis (2004). ‘The effect of mergers and acquisitions on bank efficiency in Greece’, Economic Bulletin 22, 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassopoulos, A. D. (1997). ‘Service quality and operating efficiency synergies for management control in the provision of financial services: Evidence from Greek bank branches’, European Journal of Operational Research 98, 300–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassopoulos, A. D. and D. Giokas (2000). ‘The use of data envelopment analysis in banking institutions: Evidence from the Commercial Bank of Greece’, Interfaces 30(2), 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese G. E., A. Heshmati and L. Hjalmarsson (2000). ‘Efficiency of labour use in the Swedish banking industry: A stochastic frontier approach’, Empirical Economics 25(4), 623–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P., A. N. Berger and D. B. Humphrey (1993). ‘Efficiency and productivity growth in US banking’, in H. O. Fried, K. A. L. Lovell and S. S. Schmidt (eds), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 386–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P., A. N. Berger, G. Ferrier and D. Humphrey (1998). ‘Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: A comparison of frontier efficiency methods’, Journal of Economics and Business 50, 85–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S. A., C. A. Claussen and F. R. Forsund (1993). ‘Banking efficiency in the Nordic countries: A multi-output analysis’, Working Paper, Research Department, Norges Bank, Oslo, SAB/ 9, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S. A., F. R. Forsund and E. S. Jansen (1992). ‘Malmquist indices of productivity growth during the deregulation of Norwegian banking’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94 (Supplement), 211–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. (1993). ‘Distribution-free estimates of efficiency in the US banking industry and tests of the standard distributional assumptions’, Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 261–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and D. Humphrey (1991). ‘The dominance of inefficiencies over scale and product mix economies in banking’, Journal of Monetary Economics 28, 117–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and D. B. Humphrey (1992a). ‘Megamergers in banking and the use of cost efficiency as an antitrust defense’, Antitrust Bulletin 37, 541–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and D. B. Humphrey (1992b). ‘Measurement and efficiency issues in commercial banking’, in Z. Griliches (ed.), Measurement Issues in the Service Sectors, National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Chicago Press, 245–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and D. B. Humphrey (1997). ‘Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for further research’, European Journal of Operational Research 98, 175–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and L. J. Mester (1997). ‘Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions?’, Journal of Banking and Finance 21, 895–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and L. J. Mester (1999). ‘What explains the dramatic changes in cost and profit performance of the US banking industry’, Working paper, no. 1, February, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and L. J. Mester (2003). ‘Explaining the dramatic changes in performance of US banks: Technological change, deregulation and dynamic changes in competition’, Journal of Financial Intermediation 12(1), 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., G. A. Hanweck and D. B. Humphrey (1987). ‘Competitive viability in banking: Scale, scope, and product mix economies’, Journal of Monetary Economics 20, 501–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., W. C. Hunter and S. G. Timme (1993). ‘The efficiency of financial institutions: A review and preview of research past, present, and future’, Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 221–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J. W. B. and H. Schmiedel (2003). ‘Comparing efficiency in European banking: A meta frontier approach’, De Nederlandsche Bank Research Papers, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. H. and M. Gertler (1994). ‘Are banks dead? Or are the reports greatly exaggerated?’, Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, issue Summer, 2–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. S., D. W. Caves and L. R. Christensen (1979). ‘Modelling the structure of cost and production for multiproduct firms’, Southern Economic Journal 46(1), 256–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ca§u, B. and C. Girardone (2004). ‘Financial conglomeration: Efficiency, productivity and startegic drive’, Applied Financial Economics 14, 687–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caşu, B. and C. Girardone (2005). ‘An analysis of the relevance of OBS items in explaining productivity change in European banking’, Applied Financial Economics 15, 1053–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caşu, B. and P. Molyneux (2003). ‘A comparative study of efficiency in European banking’, Applied Economics, 35(17), 1865–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caw., B., C. Girardone and P. Molyneux (2004). ‘Productivity change in European banking: A comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches’, Journal of Banking and Finance 28, 2521–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, D. W., L. R. Christensen and W. E. Diewert (1982a). ‘Multilateral comparisons of output, input and productivity using superlative index numbers’, Economic Journal 92, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, D. W., L. R. Christensen and W. E. Diewert (1982b). ‘The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity’, Econometrica, 50, 1393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes (1978). ‘Measuring the efficiency of decision making units’, European Journal of Operational Research 2(6), 429–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. R., D. W. Jorgenson and L. J. Lau (1973). ‘Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers’, Review ofEconomics and Statistics 55, 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopoulos, D. and E. G. Tsionas (2001). ‘Banking efficiency in the deregulation period: Results from heteroscedastic stochastic frontier models’, The Manchester School 69(6), 656–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopoulos, D. K., S. E. G. Lolos and E.G., Tsionas (2002). ‘Efficiency of the Greek banking system in view of the EMU: A heteroscedastic stochastic frontier approach’, Journal of Policy Modelling 24, 813–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. (1996). ‘Economic cost, scale efficiency, and competitive viability in banking’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 28(3), 342–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. A. and T. F. Siems (1997). ‘Competitive viability in banking: Looking beyond the balance sheet’, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Financial Industry Studies Working Paper, 97–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. A. and T. F. Siems (2002). ‘X-efficiency in banking: Looking beyond the balance sheet’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 34(4), November, 987–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan and A. P. Sweeney (1995). ‘Detecting earnings management’, The Accounting Review 70, 193–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Déprins, D., L. Simar and H. Tulkens (1984). ‘Measuring labour efficiency in post offices’, in M. Marchand, P. Pestieau, and H. Tulkens (eds), The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurements, Oxford: North Holland, 345–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, R. and I. Hasan (1998). ‘The performance of de novo commercial banks: A profit efficiency approach’, Journal of Banking and Finance 22(5), 565–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietsch, M. and A. Lozano-Vivas (2000). ‘How the environment determines banking efficiency: A comparison between French and Spanish industries’, Journal of Banking and Finance 24, 985–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. and H. D. Gibson (2001). ‘Greek banking at the dawn of the new millennium’, Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper, no. 2791, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and W. L. Weber (2004). ‘The effect of risk-based capital requirements on profit efficiency in banking’, Applied Economics 36, 1731–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang (1994b). ‘Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency changes in industrialised countries’, American Economic Review 84, 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). ‘The measurement of productive efficiency’, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, series A, 120(3), 253–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, G. and C. A. K. Lovell (1990). ‘Measuring cost efficiency in banking: Econometric and linear programming evidence’, Journal of Econometrics 46, 229–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garganas, N. C. (2003). ‘The changing structures of European banking: The Greek experience’, speech of the Governor of the Bank of Greece at the Bulgarian Central Bank, 14 February

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrig, T. and G. Sheldon (1999). ‘Cost, competitiveness and the changing structure of European banking’, Foundation Bank de Franc: Papers and Non-Technical Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, H. (2005). ‘Profitability of Greek banks: Recent developments,’ Bank of Greece Economic Bulletin 24/1, 7–27(in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giokas, D. I. (1991). ‘Bank branch operational efficiency: A comparative application of DEA and the loglinear model’, Omega International Journal of Management Science 19, 549–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girardone, C., P. Molyneux and E. P. M. Gardener (2004). ‘Analyzing the determinants of bank efficiency: The case of Italian banks’, Applied Economics, 36(3), 215–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J. A., P. Molyneux and J. O. S. Wilson (2001). European Banking: Efficiency, Technology, and Growth, Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grifell-Tatjé, E. and C. A. K. Lovell (1995). ‘A note on the Malmquist productivity index’, Economics Letters 47(2), 169–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grifell-Tatjé, E. and C. A. K. Lovell (1996). ‘Deregulation and productivity decline, The case of the Spanish saving banks’, Economic Letters 40, 1281–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, S. (1993). ‘Efficiency and productivity’, in H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell and S. S. Schmidt (eds), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halkos, G. E. and D. S. Salamouris (2004). ‘Efficiency measurement of the Greek commercial banks with the use of financial ratios: A data envelopment analysis approach’, Management Accounting Research 15, 201–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati, A. (2001). ‘Productivity growth, efficiency and outsourcing in manufacturing and service industries’, SSE/EFI Working Paper, no. 394, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. P. and L. J. Mester (1993). ‘A quality and risk-adjusted cost function for banks: Evidence on the “Too-Big-To-Fail” Doctrine’, Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, H. P., J. H. M. Nelissen and R. Vander Vennet (2001). ‘Efficiency effects of bank mergers and acquisitions in Europe’, Gent University Working Paper, no. 01/106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D. B. (1990). ‘Why do estimates of bank scale economies differ?’, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Economic Review 76, 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D. B. (1993). ‘Cost and technological change: Effects from bank deregulation’, Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamberoglou, N. C., E. Liapis, G. T. Simigiannis and P. Tzamourani (2004). ‘Cost efficiency in Greek banking’, Bank of Greece Working Paper, no. 9, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karafolas, S. and G. Mantakas (1996). ‘A note on cost structure and economies of scale in Greek banking’, Journal of Banking and Finance 20, 377–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., A. Lozano-Vivas, C. A. K. Lovell and I. Hasan (2001). ‘The effects of deregulation on the performance of financial institutions: The case of Spanish savings banks’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 33, 101–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C. (1951). ‘An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities’, in T. C. Koopmans (ed.), Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph no. 13, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C., C. A. K Lovell and S. Thore (1993). ‘Chance-constrained data envelopment analysis’, Managerial and Decision Economics 14, 541–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1966). ‘Allocative efficiency vs. “X-efficiency”’, American Economic Review 56, 392–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano-Vivas, A., J. T. Pastor and I. Hasan (2001). ‘European bank performance beyond country borders: What really matters?’, European Finance Review 5, 141–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano-Vivas, A., J. T. Pastor and J. M. Pastor (2002). ‘An efficiency comparison of European banking systems operating under different environmental conditions’, Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist, S. (1953). ‘Index numbers and indifference surfaces’, Trabajos de Estatistica 4, 209–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudos, J. and J. M. Pastor (2003). ‘Cost and profit efficiency in the Spanish banking sector (1985–1996): A non-parametric approach’, Applied Financial Economics 13, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudos, J., J. M. Pastor and F. Perez (2002). ‘Competition and efficiency in the Spanish anking sector: The importance of specialization’, Applied Financial Economics 12, 505–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, P. H. and D. A. McManus (1993). ‘Resolving the scale efficiency puzzle in banking’, Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, K., S. C. Ray and S. M. Millar (2001). ‘Productivity growth in large US banks: The initial post-deregulation experience’, Journal of Banking and Finance 25(5), 913–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noulas, A. G. (1997). ‘Productivity growth in the Hellenic banking industry: State versus private banks’, Applied Financial Economics 7, 223–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noulas, A. G. (2001). ‘Deregulation and operating efficiency: The case of the Greek banks’, Managerial Finance 27(8), 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ondrich, J. and J. Ruggiero (2001). ‘Efficiency measurement in the stochastic frontier model’, European Journal of Operational Research 129, 434–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., A. Lozano and J. M. Pastor (1997). ‘Efficiency of European banking systems: A correction by environmental variables’, Working Paper, IVIE WP-EC 97–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., F. Perez and J. Quesada (1997). ‘Efficiency analysis in banking firms: An international comparison’, European Journal of Operational Research 98(2), 395–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resti, A. (1997). ‘Evaluating the cost efficiency of the Italian banking market: What can be learned from the joint application of parametric and non-parametric techniques’, Journal of Banking and Finance 21, 221–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezitis, A. N. (2006). ‘Productivity growth in the Greek banking industry: A nonparametric approach’, Journal of Applied Economics ix(1), May, 119–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rime, B. and K. J. Stiroh (2003). ‘The performance of universal banks: Evidence from Switzerland’, Journal of Banking and Finance 27, 2121–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K. E. (1998). ‘Nontraditional activities and the efficiency of US commercial banks’, Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 467–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K. E. and J. F. Sinkey (1999). ‘An analysis of nontraditional activities at US commercial banks’, Review of Financial Economics 8(1), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruthenberg, D. and R. Elias (1996). ‘Cost economies and interest margins in a unified European banking market’, Journal of Economics and Business 48, 231–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schure, P. and R. Wagenvoort (1999). ‘Economies of scale and efficiency in European banking: New evidence’, European Investment bank: Economic and Financial Report, 1999/01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schure, P., R. Wagenvoort and D. O’ Brien (2004). ‘The efficiency and the conduct of European banks: Developments after 1992’, Review of Financial Economics 13, 371–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealey, C. W. and J. T. Lindley (1977). ‘Inputs, outputs and theory of production and costs at depository financial institutions’, Journal of Finance 34, 1251–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard R. W. (1970). Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siems, T. F. and J. A. Clark (1997). ‘Rethinking bank efficiency and regulation: How offbalance sheet activities make a difference’, Financial Industry Studies, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L. (1992). ‘Estimating efficiencies from frontier models with panel data: A comparison of parametric, nonparametric and semiparametric methods with bootstrapping’, Journal ofProductivity Analysis 3, 171–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L. and P. W. Wilson (1995). ‘Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in non-parametric frontier models’, Papers 9543a, Catholique de Louvain — Centre for Operations Research and Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L. and P. W. Wilson, 2007. ‘Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes’, Forthcoming paper, Journal of Econometrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soteriou, A. C. and Y. Stavrinides (2000). ‘An internal customer service quality data envelopment analysis model for bank branches’, International Journal of Bank Marketing 18(5), 246–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiroh, K. J. (2000). ‘How did bank holding companies prosper in the 1990s?’, Journal of Banking and Finance 24, 1703–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stournaras, Y. (2006). ‘Interactions between financial sector developments and the macroeconomic environment: The Greek experience,’ mimeo, University of Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2003). ‘Nontraditional activities and bank efficiency revisited: A distributional analysis for Spanish financial institutions’, Journal of Economics and Business 55, 371–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsionas, E. G., S. E. G. Lolos and D. K. Christopoulos (2003). ‘The performance of the Greek banking system in view of the EMU: Results from a non-parametric approach’, Economic Modelling 20, 571–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Vennet, R. (2002). ‘Cost and profit efficiency of financial conglomerates and universal banks in Europe’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 34, 254–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassiloglou, M. and D. Giokas (1990). ‘A study of the relative efficiency of bank branches’, The Journal of the Operational Research Society 41(7), 591–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, L. (2003). ‘Is there a lasting gap in bank efficiency between Eastern and Western European countries?’, paper presented at the ‘Twentieth Symposium on Monetary and Financial Economics’, The University of Birmingham, 5–6 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenvoort, J. L. M., D. O’Brien and P. Schure (2001). ‘The recursive thick frontier approach to estimating frontier production functions’, University of Victoria Econometrics Working Papers, no. 0503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelock, D. C. and P. W. Wilson (1999). ‘Technical progress, inefficiency and productivity change in US Banking (1984–1993)’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 31, 213–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2001). ‘Financial deregulation and productivity change in European banking’, Revue Bancaire et Financiere 8, 470–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Georgios E. Chortareas, Claudia Girardone and Alexia Ventouri

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chortareas, G.E., Girardone, C., Ventouri, A. (2008). Efficiency and Productivity Change in Greek Banking: Methods and Recent Evidence. In: Molyneux, P., Vallelado, E. (eds) Frontiers of Banks in a Global Economy. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590663_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics