Skip to main content

Electronic Money Use: Evidence from Survey Data

  • Chapter
Frontiers of Banks in a Global Economy

Abstract

This chapter sets out to analyse the factors influencing cashless payment instrument use (i.e., e-money use), both by considering these instruments’ specific attributes and by combining the assumptions of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) with Technology Acceptance Models (TAM). A survey on undergraduate students has been conducted in order to identify the personal, sociological, and technological variables involved in e-money use. The proposed model has been tested on students’ payment habits in using credit, debit, and prepaid cards. Overall we found that personal and technological attitudes, social and control beliefs, and payment instruments features (in terms of perceived efficacy and efficiency) are linked with electronic money use. We note that the identification of variables affecting adoption by retail customers could be useful for both regulators and financial institutions. Regulators, usually concerned with the behaviour of the institutions under their jurisdiction, could use these findings when drafting prudential and supervision rules governing financial institutions offering payment services. By recognizing issues that affect the behaviour of their customer segments, financial intermediaries can take advantage of aspects that produce differences and changes in payment practices, developing their product range in response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). ‘The theory of planned behaviour’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2002). ‘Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations’, Working Paper, University of Massachussets.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. S. and A. R. Pagan (1979). ‘A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation’, Econometrica 47, 1287–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. and J. Shao (2000). ‘Nearest neighbour imputation for survey data’, Journal of Official Statistics 16, 113–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchitelli, G., A. Herzel and G. E. Montanari (1992). ‘Il Campionamento Statistico’, Il Mulino, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. D. and S. Weisberg (1983). ‘Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression’, Biometrika 70(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. (1989). ‘Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology’, MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F., R. Bagozzi and P. Warshaw (1989). ‘User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models’, Management Science 35(8), 982–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECB (2006). ‘Payment and securities settlement systems in the European Union and in the acceding countries’, Bluebook, March 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filotto, U., (1998). Distribuzione e Tecnologia: la Banca del Domani’, EGEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour, London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., (1984). ‘Many sides of the coin: The psychology of money usage’, Personality and Individual Differences 5, 501–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, F. and E. Klee (2003). ‘Technology adoption and consumer payments: Evidence from survey data’, Review of Network Economics 2(2), 175–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe, C. R., L. Leach and P. R. lurner (1999). ‘Discriminating the number of credit cards held by college students: Using credit and money attitudes’, Journal of Economic Psychology 20, 643–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, L., (1982). ‘Consumer payment systems: The relationship of attribute structure to preference and usage’, Journal of Business 55(4), 531–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D., M. Kim and B. Vale (2001). ‘Realizing the gains from electronic payments: Costs, pricing and payment choice’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 33(2), 216–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D., L. Pulley and J. Vesala (1996). ‘Cash, paper and electronic payments: A cross-country analysis’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 28(4), 914–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, B. and R. Turrisi (2004). ‘An examination of college students money management tendencies’, Journal of Economic Psychology25, 601–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A. (1988). ‘Missing data adjustment in large survey’, Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 6, 287–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, B. (2000). ‘Why do consumers pay bills electronically? An empirical analysis’, Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, no. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, B. and T. McHugh (2001). ‘Competition and innovation in the consumer e-payments markets? Considering the demand, supply and public policy issues’, Emerging Payments Occasional Working Paper Series, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality, New York: Harper &amp Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleson, M. (2004). ‘Exploring the relationship between money attitudes and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs’, International Journal of Consumer Studies 28(1), 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J.-C. and J. Tirole (2004). ‘Two-sided markets: An overview’, IDEI Working Paper, no. 258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J. and C. I. Hoyland (1960). ‘Cognitive, affective and behavioural components of attitudes’, in C. I. Hoyland and M. J. Rosenberg, Attitudes, Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency among Attitude Components, Connecticutt: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rysman, M. (2006). ‘An empirical analysis of payment card usage’, Working Paper, Boston University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shy, O. and J. Tarkka (2002). ‘The market for electronic cash cards’, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 34(2), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavins, J. (2001). ‘Effect of consumer characteristics on the use of payment instruments’, New England Economic Review 3, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., C. Speier and M. G. Morris (2002). ‘User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model’, Decision Sciences 33(2), 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). ‘A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity’, Econometrica 48, 817–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, J. J., F. E. Noring and J. G. Anderson (1995). ‘College students’ attitudes toward credit cards’, Journal of Consumer Studies 19, 155–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 David Pelilli

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pelilli, D. (2008). Electronic Money Use: Evidence from Survey Data. In: Molyneux, P., Vallelado, E. (eds) Frontiers of Banks in a Global Economy. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590663_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics