Skip to main content

Challenges of Anti-Corruption Policies in Post-Communist Countries

  • Chapter
Corruption and Development

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Development ((PSD))

Abstract

This chapter reviews corruption and anti-corruption policies in post-communist countries since the beginning of transition by reviewing authors who have identified corrupt characteristics specific to the post-communist countries (Mendras, 1998; Andreff, 2003; Satarov and Parkhomenko, 2001). As a group, the post-communist countries are considered among the most corrupt in the world. Indeed, according to Transparency International (2005), seven transition countries are in the 30 most corrupt of 159 countries in the index. The historical legacy of communism, the history of transition, and the adaptation of networks into modern clientelism emerge as powerful conditioning experiences in the types of corruption which emerge, with two conceptual types appearing as particularly salient: state capture or political corruption, and administrative corruption (Hellman, Kaufman and Jones, 2000; 2002). Using measurement and diagnostic tools from major donors, the World Bank (WB), Transparency International (TI), Political Risk Services and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) the chapter then uses the prevalence of these corruption types to create a comparative typology of measurable corruption within the post-communist Eastern European countries. However, by using donor diagnostics this standardising methodology ultimately occludes a more diverse, historical and contextual picture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahrend, R. and Thompson, W. (2005), ‘Fifteen years of economic reform in Russia: what has been achieved? What remains to be done?’, OECD Economics Department Working Paper, 430

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andreff, W. (2003), La mutation des économies postsocialistes: une analyse économique alternative, Paris: L’Harmattan ‘Pays de l’Est’ Collection

    Google Scholar 

  • Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. (1995), Privatizing Russia (Cambridge MA: MIT Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA (2006), World FactBook, accessed from: www.cia.gov/cia/publications/fact-book/index.html, 30 November 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Development Assistant Committee (DAC) (2003), Synthesis of Lessons Learned of Donor Practices in Fighting Corruption, Paris: OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., Claessens, S., Fan, J. P. H., and Lang, H. H. P. (1998), ‘Diversification and Efficiency of Investment by East Asian Corporations’, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, 2033

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchene, G. (1987), L’économie de l’URSS, Paris: Editions La Découverte

    Google Scholar 

  • Egnell, E., and Pessik, M. (1974), URSS: l’entreprise face à l’Etat, Paris: Seuil Eds

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House (2005), Annual Global Survey 2005, accessed from: www.freedom-house.org on 30 November 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House (2005b), Nations in Transit, Budapest: Freedom House Europe

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S. C. J. and Stout, J. (2005), ‘Assessment Strategies and Practices for Integrity and Anti-corruption Measures: a Comparative overview’, in J. Bertok, Public Sector Integrity: a Framework for Assessment, Paris: OECD, pp. 75–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO) (2003), Rapport final du Premier cycle d’évaluation en Moldavie, Strasbourg, October 2003 available from: www.greco.coe.int

    Google Scholar 

  • Guriev, S. and Rachinsky, A. (2004), ‘Ownership concentration in Russian industry’, CEFIR Working Paper, 41, October, pp. 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, J. and Kaufmann, D. (2004), ‘The Inequality of Influence’, in Kornai, J. and Rose-Ackerman, S., eds, Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, J. S., Kaufmann, D. and Jones, G. (2000), Anticorruption in Transition: a Contribution to the Policy Debate, World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., Kaufmann, D., and Schankerman, M. (2000b) ‘Measuring Governance, Corruption, and State Capture: How Firms and Bureaucrats Shape the Business Environment in Transition Economies’, World Bank Institute, Regulation and Finance BERD, Policy Research Working Paper 2312, April

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, J., Jones, G. and Kaufmann, D. (2002), Far from Home: Do Foreign Investors Import Higher Standards of Governance in Transition Economies? Washington DC, World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. (2003), The Oligarchs: Wealth and Power in the New Russia, NY: PublicAffairs

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2005), ‘Georgia: Second Review Under the Three-Year Arrangement Under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility and Requests for Waiver of Performance Criterion and Conversion of an Indicative Target into a Performance Criterion’, Country Report No. 05/314, Washington DC: IMF, September

    Google Scholar 

  • Information Science for Democracy (2005), Diagnostics of the Corruption in Russia: 2001–2005, Moscow, available from www.indem.ru

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, A. and Kaminski, B. (2001), ‘Governance and Corruption in Transition: the Challenge of Subverting Corruption’, Paper presented on Creating a Supportive Environment for Business Enterprise and Economic Growth: Institutional Reform and Governance, UNECE Economic Analisis Division Spring Seminar

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M. (2005), Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996–2004, World Bank, Washington DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karklins, R. (2002), ‘Typology of Post-Communist Corruption’, Problems of Post-Communism, 49, 4, pp. 22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotkin, S. and Sajo, A. (2002), ‘Political Corruption in Transition: a Sceptic’s Handbook’, Central European University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornaï, J. (1992), Growth, Shortage and Efficiency, Oxford: Basil Blackwell and Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. (1974), ‘The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society’, American Economic Review no. 64, June, pp. 291–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaronne, D. (2002), ‘Privatisation et corruption dans les pays de l’Est: le paradoxe des privatisations de masse’, in I. Cucui and I. Stregaroiu, Le management de la transition, Bucharest: Editura Economica, pp. 49–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendras, M. (1998), ‘Enrichissement et clientélisme en Russie’, Mondes en dévelopement, 26, 102, pp. 83–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, J. (2001) ‘Democratic transitions and forms of corruption: Corruption and democracy’, Crime, law and social change, vol. 36, no 4, pp. 379–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Political Risk Services Group (2004), International Country Risk Guide 2004, available from www.prsgroup.com/icrg/, accessed 1 December 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, J. (2000), Confronting Corruption: the Elements of a National Integrity System, TI Source Book 2000, accessed from www.transparency.org/publications/sourcebook on 30 November 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiser, M. (1999), ‘Trust in transition’, BERD Working paper No. 39

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, I. (1994), ‘The stabilisation of transition in post-communist societies’, communication at PROMETEE seminar, Buenos Aires July 1994, presented also to the Conference ‘Central Russia at the edge of the XXIth century’ Orel (Russia) July 1995, p. 17 (published in Russia)

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, I. (1998), ‘La Russie deviendra-t-elle une économie de marché?’, in J. Fontanel, ed., Où va l’économie de la Russie?, Grenoble: PUG

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, I. and Zagainova, A. (2006), ‘Transition and corruption lessons for Georgia’, Georgian Economie Trends Quarterly review, no 4, Georgian-European Policy and Legal Advice Centre, pp. 62–76, geplac.org/files/english_2006_4.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Satarov, G. and Parkhomenko, S. (2001), ‘Raznoobraziye stran, raznoobraziye korupptsii: analys sravnitelnih issledovaniy’, Moscow: INDEM

    Google Scholar 

  • Selowsky, M. (2000), Transition after a Decade: Lessons and Policy Agenda, Washington: World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1993), ‘Corruption’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 58, 3, pp. 599–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P. B. (1999) ‘Rationality and Corruption in the Post-Socialist World’, University of Virginia School of Law, Working Paper No. 99–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Steves, E and Rousso, A. (2003), ‘Anti-corruption programmes in post-communist transition countries and changes in the business environment, 1999–2002’, EBRD Working paper No. 85

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2002), Globalization and Its Discontents, W. W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Surdej, A. and Gadowska, K. (2005), ‘Political Corruption in Poland’, Working Papers of the Research Centre for East European Studies no 65, Bremen, March

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International (TI), Global Corruption Report (2005, 2004), accessed from www.transparency.org on 30 November 2006

  • Treisman, D. (2002) ‘Postcommunist Corruption’, Department of Political Science University of California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (1999), Handbook on Fighting Corruption, Washington: USAID Center for Democracy and Governance Technical Publication Series, February

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakovlev, E. and Zhuravskaya, E. (2004), ‘State capture and controlling owners of firms’, Center for Economic and Financial Research, Working Paper No. 42, Russia

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2000), Anticorruption in Transition: a contribution to the policy debate, Washington, DC: World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005), Governance Matters: Worldwide Governance Indicators, available from www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Anastassiya Zagainova

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zagainova, A. (2007). Challenges of Anti-Corruption Policies in Post-Communist Countries. In: Bracking, S. (eds) Corruption and Development. Palgrave Studies in Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590625_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics