Abstract
In a village in Northern India around 1800 the law was represented on the most basic level by the chaukidar, or village watchman, who was usually little more than a night watch.1 The village itself came under the jurisdiction of a thana, or police post, in charge of a thanadar, senior police officer, who had in his command a number of daroghas, or police officers. Chaukidars were locals and often depended on the zamindars and villagers for their livelihood and for various reasons many crimes often remained unreported outside the village boundaries. Locally the daroghas and thanadars also had much leeway regarding the majority of petty crimes and minor offences, which they were authorised to deal with. Only in more serious cases, such as murder, affray or the theft of large sums would the thanadar report to the English district Magistrate. Within the individual districts the Magistrate would deal with all lesser criminal cases, while the Courts of Circuit touring the districts twice a year tried serious cases such as armed robbery and murder. Cases that could incur severe sentences or the death penalty were then referred to the high court or Nizamat Adalat at Calcutta where the sentences of the Courts of Circuit were either confirmed or reversed.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For this and the following, see Singha (1998); see also Sleeman, Rambles and recollections of an Indian official (London, 1844, reprint New Delhi: Asian Educational Services, 1995);
Percival Griffiths, To Guard My People: The History of the Indian Police (London: Benn, 1971).
Plan for the administration of justice’, 15 Aug. 1772, quoted in Jörg Fisch, Cheap Lives and Dear Limbs: The British Transformation of the Bengal Criminal Law, 1769–1817, Beiträge zur Südasienforschung band 79 (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1983), pp. 32–7.
Cunningham to Wellesley, 28 Oct. 1802, Home Dept (Foreign & Political), 31 Mar. 1803 (no. 18), NAI. See also Meena Bhargava, State, Society and Ecology: Gorakhpur in Transition, 1750–1830 (New Delhi: Manohar, 1999), pp. 96–7.
Yule and Burnell, Hobson jobson, p. 262; and W. Crooke, The Tribes and Castes of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh (Calcutta, 1896), vol. I, pp. 100–1.
See CC to Dowdeswell, 11 Dec. 1807, BCJP, P/129/42, 1 Jan. 1808 (no. 33), APAC. The irregular horsemen were mostly Jats or Rohillas and often came from the various indigenous armies, which had been disbanded, see Seema Alavi, The Sepoys and the Company: Tradition and Transition in Northern India, 1770–1830 (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1995), ch. 6.
Copyright information
© 2007 Kim A. Wagner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wagner, K.A. (2007). The Discovery of Thuggee, Etawah 1809. In: Thuggee. Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590205_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590205_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36154-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59020-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)