Abstract
This chapter will contrast the human rights notion with the theological positions of three of the world’s major religions. Volumes have been written about each; these pages will provide a brief overview of equality and women. While each of these religious traditions contains a broad spectrum of interpretation on every social and religious topic, and the fullest compatibility with human rights norms for women, those positions that contribute to the conflict between religious freedoms and women’s rights will receive particular attention. The chapter will demonstrate that in some religious communities the rights notion is so different from essential theological beliefs that its moral authority is eroded and the construct itself is disabled as a tool for securing religious women’s rights. Alternately, the human rights idea can be so modified to adapt to religious teachings that the idea of gender equality is lost and the rights construct, as some religious communities employ it, is again unable to promote women’s actual rights.
And do you not know that you are (each) cm Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil’s gateway: you are the unsealer of that (forbidden) tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God’s image, man. On account of your desert — that is, death — even the Son of God had to die.
Tertullian (c. 155–c. 255), De cultu feminarum 1:11
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Theological challenges to religious women’s rights
James P. Piscatori, “Human Rights in Islamic Political Culture,” in Kenneth Thompson, ed., The Moral Imperatives of Human Rights: A World Survey ( Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1980 ), p. 143.
Chandra Muzaffar, “Equality and the Spiritual Traditions: An Overview,” in R. Siriwardena, ed., Equality and the Religious Traditions of Asia ( New York: St. Martins Press, 1987 ), p. 20.
Fouad Zakaria, “The Standpoint of Contemporary Muslim Fundamentalists,” in Nahid Toubia, ed., Women of the Arab World ( Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Zed Press, 1988 ), pp. 30–31.
Cited in Irene Bloom, J. Paul Martin, and Wayne L. Proudfoot, eds, Religious Diversity and Human Rights ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1996 ), p. 320.
Kevin Dwyei,Arab Voices (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991), p. 39.
Robert Traer, Faith in Human Rights ( Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1991 ), p. 120.
Abu’l A’la Mawdudi, Purdah and the Status of Women in Islam ( Lahore: Islamic Publications, 1981 ).
Nawal El-Saadawi, The Hidden Face of Eve ( London: Zed, 1980 ), p. 44.
Fatima Mernissi, Beyond the Veil ( New York: Schenkman Publishing, 1975 ), p. 15.
Max L. Stackhouse, Creeds, Society and Human Rights ( Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1984 ), p. 214.
Meera Kosambi, At the Intersection of Gender Reform and Religious Belief ( Bombay: Research Centre for Women’s Studies, 1993 ), p. 17.
Vanaja Dhruvarajan, Hindu Women and the Power of Ideology ( Granby, MA: Bergin and Garvey Publishers, 1989 ), p. 29.
Prabhati Mukherjee, Hindu Women, Normative Models (Hyderabad: Orient Longman Ltd, 1978), pp. 49, 50.
Malladi Sabbamma, Hinduism and Women ( Delhi: Ajanta Publications, 1992 ), p. 208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Alison L. Boden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boden, A.L. (2007). Theological Challenges to Religious Women’s Rights. In: Women’s Rights and Religious Practice. York Studies on Women and Men. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590069_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590069_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36226-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59006-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)