Skip to main content

A Deal Too Far: The Case of the Killer Acquisition

  • Chapter
Mergers and Acquisitions

Part of the book series: Finance and Capital Markets Series ((FCMS))

  • 1164 Accesses

Abstract

Mergers and acquisitions have long been, and seem likely to remain, objects of fascination within the world of finance. While scholars puzzle over the theoretical motivations and value impacts of such transactions, practitioners devote their efforts to fueling what has become a burgeoning juggernaut.1 The result of these twin streams of effort has been the creation of an unresolved, though clearly important, paradox.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agrawal, A., Jaffe, J. and Mandelker, G. (1992) “The Post Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-Examination of an Anomaly”, Journal of Finance, 47: 1605–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J., Harris, R. and Titman, S. (1991) “The Post Merger Share Price Performance of Acquiring Firms”, Journal of Financial Economics, 29: 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, D. and Rovit, S. (2004) Mastering the Merger—Four Critical Decisions that Make or Break the Deal ( Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P., Palepu, K. and Ruback, R. (1997) “Which Takeovers Are Profitable: Strategic or Financial?”, Sloan Management Review, 38: 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. and Ruback, S. (1983) “The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, 11: 5–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. (1986) “The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers”, Journal of Business, 59: 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirower, M. (1997) The Synergy Trap—How Companies Lose the Acquisitions Game ( New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudarsanam, S. (2003) Creating Value From Mergers and Acquisitions: The Challenges ( Harlow: Prentice–Hall/Financial Times), esp. ch. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserstein, B. (2000) Big Deal — 2000 and Beyond ( New York: Warner Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1989) Case Study Research: Design and Methods ( Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Tyrone M. Carlin Nigel Finch Guy Ford

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carlin, T.M., Finch, N., Ford, G. (2007). A Deal Too Far: The Case of the Killer Acquisition. In: Gregoriou, G.N., Neuhauser, K.L. (eds) Mergers and Acquisitions. Finance and Capital Markets Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230589681_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics