Skip to main content

Mediation and the Ending of Conflicts

  • Chapter
Contemporary Peacemaking

Abstract

Progress towards the settlement of protracted and violent social conflicts usually takes one of two basic forms. In one, the adversaries manage to arrive at some solution through direct, interparty discussion of the issues in contention. They then bargain towards an accommodation of their competing goals that, at the very least, satisfies enough of their underlying interests to make the resultant settlement acceptable to leaders and rank and file followers, and thus durable over time. This process of negotiation is usually an extremely complex one, subject to many vicissitudes, and liable, because of its fragility, to break down frequently and disastrously, as in the Basque country and in Sri Lanka. Perhaps for this last reason, a directly negotiated bilateral settlement is something of a rarity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E.E. Azar, The Management of Protracted Social Conflict ( Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing, 1990 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Jabri, Mediating Conflict: Decision Making and Western Intervention in Namibia ( Manchester NH: Manchester University Press, 1990 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. I.W. Zartman, Ripe for Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.J. Fisher & L. Keashley, ‘The potential complimentarity of mediation and consultation within a contingency model of third party consultation’, Journal of Peace Research, 28, 1 (1991) pp. 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.Z. Rubin, ‘The Timing of Ripeness and the Ripeness of Timing’, in L. Kriesberg & S.J. Thornson (eds), Timing the De-escalation of International Conflicts ( New York: Syracuse University Press, 1991 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.J. Stedman, Peacemaking in Civil Wars: International Mediation in Zimbabwe,1974–1980 ( Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner, 1991 ).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Mitchell, ‘The right moments: Notes on four models of “ripeness”’, Paradigms, 9, 2 (Winter 1995) pp. 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Mitchell, Gestures of Conciliation ( London: Macmillan, 2000 ).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Loder, ‘The Peace process in Mali’, Security Dialogue, 28, 4 (1997) pp. 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Corbin, The Norway Channel ( New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1994 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Saravanamuttu, ‘Sri Lanka: The Intractability of Ethnic Conflict’, in J. Darby & R. Mac Ginty (eds), The Management of Peace Processes ( London: Macmillan, 2000 ), pp. 195–227.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Ibrahim & J. Jenner, ‘Breaking the Cycle of Violence in Wajir’, chapter. 10 in R. Herr & J. Z. Herr (eds), Transforming Violence ( Scottdale PA: Herald Press, 1998 ).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Hume, Mozambique’s War: The Role of Mediation and Good Offices ( Washington DC: USIP Press, 1994 ).

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Princen, ‘Mediation by a Transnational Organization: The Case of the Vatican’, chapter. 7 in J. Bercovitch & J.Z. Rubin (eds), Mediation in International Relations ( New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992 ), pp. 149–175.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Fisher, Inter-Active Conflict Resolution ( New York: Syracuse University Press, 1997 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Kleiboer, International Mediation: The Multiple Realities of Third Party Intervention ( Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner, 1997 ).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Kleiboer & P. t’Hart, ‘Time to talk? Multiple perspectives on timing of international mediation’, Cooperation and Conflict, 30 (1995) pp. 307–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. H.H. Saunders, ‘We need a larger theory of negotiation: The importance of the pre-negotiation phase’, Negotiation Journal, 1, 1 (July 1985) pp. 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J.A. Wall, ‘Mediation: An analysis, review and proposed research’, Journal of Conflict Studies, 25, 1 (March 1981) pp. 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J.A. Wall & A. Lynn, ‘Mediation: A current review’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 1 (March 1993) pp. 160–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Christopher Mitchell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitchell, C. (2008). Mediation and the Ending of Conflicts. In: Darby, J., Ginty, R.M. (eds) Contemporary Peacemaking. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584556_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics