Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conditions of Social Vulnerability, Work and Low Income: Evidence for Europe in Comparative Perspective

  • Chapter
Institutions for Social Well-Being

Abstract

Many nations have a long tradition of measuring income inequality and poverty and weighing the effectiveness, successes, and failures of government policies aimed at poverty reduction and at offsetting the instability effects of globalisation of labour markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alesina, A., E. Glaeser and B. Sacerdote (2005) ‘Why Do Americans Work So Hard?’, Public Policy Research, 12: 148–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arjona, R., M. Ladaique and M. Pearson (2001) ‘Growth, Inequality, and Social Protection’, DEELSA/ELSA/WD 4. JT00110378. Paris, OECD, Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Paper No. 51.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arriba, A. and L. Moreno (2002) ‘Spain: Poverty, Social Exclusion and Safety Nets’, Documento de Trabajo 02–10, Madrid, Unidad de Políticas Comparades, http://www.iesam.csic.es/doctrab2/dt-0210.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B., L. Rainwater and T.M. Smeeding (1995) ‘Income Distribution in OECD Countries: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS)’, Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Social Policy Studies No. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B., B. Cantillon, E. Marlier and B. Nolan (2002) Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J., R.F. Disney, A. Duncan and J. VanReenen (2005) ‘The Internationalisation of Public Welfare’, The Economic Journal, 115 C62–C81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björklund, A. and R. Freeman (1997) ‘Generating Equality and Eliminating Poverty — The Swedish Way’, in R. B. Freeman, R. Topel and B. Swedenborg (eds), The Welfare State in Transition: Reforming the Swedish Model, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R.M. and R. Schoeni (2003) ‘Changes in the Distribution of Children’s Family Income over the 1990s’, American Economic Review, 93: 304–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, B. and M. Jäntti (1999) ‘Child Poverty across Industrialized Nations’, Florence, UNICEF International Child Development Centre, Innocenti Occasional Papers, Economic Policy Series No. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, B., S.P. Jenkins and J. Micklewright (2001) The Dynamics of Child Poverty in Industrialised Countries, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. (2003) ‘Using Indicators at the National Level: Child Poverty in the United Kingdom’, Unpublished manuscript, Heslington, York, United Kingdom, University of York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandolini, A. and T.M. Smeeding (2008) ‘Inequality: International Evidence’, in S. Durlauf and L. Bloom (eds), New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edn, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtless, G. and C. Jencks (2003) ‘American Inequality and Its Consequences’, in H. Aaron, J. M. Lindsay and P. Nivola (eds), Agenda for the Nation, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, pp. 61–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canberra Group (2001) Expert Group on Household Income Statistics: Final Report and Recommendations, Ottawa, Canada, Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W.H. and M. Corak (2005) ‘Child Poverty and Changes in Child Poverty in Rich Countries since 1990’, Syracuse, New York, Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citro, C.F. and R.T. Michael (1995) Measuring Poverty: A New Approach, Washington, DC, National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark-Kauffman, E., G. J. Duncan and P. Morris (2003) ‘How Welfare Policies affect Child and Adolescent Achievement’, American Economic Review, 93: 299–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, S., C.M. Heflin and M.E. Corcoran (2000) ‘Does It Pay to Move from Welfare to Work?’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21: 671–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, I. and A.-C. Guio (2003) ‘Poverty and Social Exclusion in the EU after Laeken Part 1’, Statistics in Focus 8/2003. Catalog No. KS-NK-030008-EN-N. Luxembourg: Eurostat, 27 February, Available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-NK-03–008/EN/KS-NK-03–008-EN.PDF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G.J., B. Gustafsson, R. Hauser, G. Schmauss, H. Messinger, R. Muffels, B. Nolan and J.-C. Ray (1993) ‘Poverty Dynamics in Eight Countries’, Journal of Population Economics, 6: 215–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood, D. T. (2000) ‘Anti-Poverty Policy for Families in the Next Century: From Welfare to Work — and Worries’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14: 187–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R. and J. H. Goldthorpe (2002) ‘Intergenerational Inequality: A Sociological Perspective’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16: 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (1998a) ‘Analysis of Income Distribution in 13 EU Member States’, Statistics in Focus, Population and Social Conditions 1998–11, Luxembourg, European Statistical Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (1998b) ‘Recommendations of the Task Force on Social Exclusion and Poverty Statistics’, CPS 98/31/2. 31st Meeting of the Statistical Programme Committee, Luxembourg, Statistical Office of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, L.V. (2005) ‘Social Protection and Chronic Poverty: Portugal and the Southern European Welfare Regime’, Porto, Portugal, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto, FEP Working Papers No. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Förster, M.F. and M. Pellizzari (2000) ‘Trends and Driving Factors in Income Distribution and Poverty in the OECD Area’, Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Labour Market and Social Policy — Occasional Paper No. 42.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, M.F. and K. Vleminckx (2004) ‘International Comparisons of Income Inequality and Poverty: Findings from the Luxembourg Income Study’, Socio-Economic Review, 2: 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, I., L. Rainwater and T. M. Smeeding (2006) ‘A Reexamination of Welfare State and Inequality in Rich Nations: How In-kind Transfers and Indirect Taxes Change the Story’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25: 897–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R.E., B. Headey, R. Muffels and H.-J. Dirven (1999) The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gornick, J. C. and M. K. Meyers (2003) Families that Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment, New York, Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, P. and T.M. Smeeding (2000) ‘Empirical Evidence of Income Inequality in Industrialized Countries’, in A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds), Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. 1, Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 261–308.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grogger, J. (2003) ‘Welfare Transitions in the 1990s: The Economy, Welfare Policy, and the EITC’, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No. 9472.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, A., K. deVos and A. Zaidi (1994) ‘Patterns of Poverty in Europe’, Luxembourg, Final Report to the European Statistical Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, J. (2003) ‘The Blair Government and Child Poverty: An Extra One Per cent for Children in the United Kingdom’, in I. V. Sawhill (ed.), One Percent for the Kids: New Policies, Brighter Futures for America’s Children, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, J. and J. Waldfogel (2004) ‘A “Third Way” in Welfare Reform: What are the Lessons for the US?’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23: 765–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immervoll, H., H. Levy, C. Lietz, D. Mantovani and H. Sutherland (2006) ‘The Sensitivity of Poverty Rates to Macro-Level Changes in the European Union’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30: 181–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäntti, M. and S. Danziger (2000) ‘Income Poverty in Advanced Countries’, in A. B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds), Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. 1 Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 309–78.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jäntti, M., B. Bratsberg, K. Röed, O. Raaum, R. Naylor, E. Österbacka, A. Björklund and T. Eriksson (2006) ‘American Exceptionalism in a New Light: A Comparison of Intergenerational Earnings Mobility in the Nordic Countries, the United Kingdom and the United States’, Bonn, Germany, Institute for the Study of Labor, IZA DP No. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. and T. Siedler (2007) ‘The Intergenerational Transmission of Poverty in Industrialized Countries’, Manchester, DPM/Chronic Poverty Research Centre, Working Paper No. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., T.M. Smeeding and B.B. Torrey (2005) ‘United States Inequality through the Prisms of Income and Consumption’, Monthly Labor Review, 128: 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, L. (1998) ‘Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment’, Syracuse, NY, Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. (2000) ‘Anti-Poverty Effectiveness of Taxes and Income Transfers in Welfare States’, Syracuse, NY, Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University, March, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert, P.H. (2004) Growing Public: Volume 1, The Story: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marical, F., M. Mira d-Ercole, M. Vaalavuo and G. Verbist (2006) ‘Publicly Provided Goods and the Distribution of Resources’, Social Employment and Migration Working Paper no. 45. Paris, OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matsaganis, M., L. Ferrera and L. Moreno (2003) ‘Mending Nets in the South: Anti-poverty Policies in Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain’, Social Policy and Administration, 37: 639–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S.S. and I. Garfinkel (1994) ‘Single Mother Families and Social Policy: Lessons for the United States from France, Canada, and Sweden’, in K. McFate, R. Lawson and W.J. Wilson (eds), Poverty, Inequality, and the Future of Social Policy: Western States in the New World Order, New York, Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micklewright, J. and K. Stewart (2001) ‘Child Weil-Being in the EU — and Enlargement to the East’, in K. Vleminckx and T.M. Smeeding (eds), Child Weil-Being, Child Poverty, and Child Policy in Modern Nations: What Do We Know?, Bristol, UK, Policy Press, pp. 99–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A.M. (1975) Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff, Washington, DC, The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2007) OECD Social Expenditure Database: 1980–2003, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2007a) ‘National Accounts and Historical Statistics’, Paris. Accessed 10 December 2007. Available from http://miranda.sourceoecd.org/vl=6291361/cl=52/nw=l/rpsv/book/bl2_about.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2007b) ‘OECD Economic Outlook’, Paris. Accessed 10 December 2007. Available from http://sourceoecd.org/vl=6291361/cl=52/nw=l/rpsv/periodical/p5_about.htm?jnlissn=04745574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2007c) ‘Main Economic Indicators’, Paris. Accessed 10 December 2007. Available from http://miranda.sourceoecd.org/vl=6291361/cI=52/nw=l/rpsv/statistic/s16_about.htm?jnlissn=16081234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, L.S. (2002) ‘Time, Money, and Inequality in International Perspective’, Syracuse, NY, Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pear, R. (2003) ‘Welfare Spending Shows Huge Shift from Checks to Service’, New York Times, 12 October, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L. and T.M. Smeeding (2003) Poor Kids in a Rich Country: America’s Children in Comparative Perspective, New York, Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (1994) Poverty Comparisons Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics, vol. 56, Chur, Switzerland, Harwood Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (1996) ‘Issues in Measuring and Modeling Poverty’, Economic Journal, 106: 1328–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. and E. Smolensky (1977) Public Expenditure, Taxes, and the Distribution of Income: The United States, 1950–1970, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, A. (2006) ‘Globalisation and the Reform of European Social Models’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44: 369–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, I. and S. Parrott (2003) ‘Are Policies That Assist Low-Income Workers Receiving Appropriate Priority?’, Washington, DC, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigle-Rushton, W. and S. McLanahan (2004) ‘Father Absences and Child Well-Being: A Critical Review’, in D.P. Moynihan, L. Rainwater and T.M. Smeeding (eds), The Future of the Family, New York, Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. (2007), Can Germany Be Saved? The Malaise of the World’s First Welfare State, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T.M. (2002) ‘No Child Left Behind?’, Indicators, 1: 6–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T.M. (2005) ‘Public Policy, Economic Inequality, and Poverty: The United States in Comparative Perspective’, Social Science Quarterly, 86(5): 955–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T. M. (2006) ‘Poor People in a Rich Nation: The United States in Comparative Perspective’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20: 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T.M., M. O’Higgins and L. Rainwater (1990) Poverty, Inequality and the Distribution of Income in a Comparative Context: The Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), London/Washington, DC, Harvester Wheatsheaf/Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T.M., L. Rainwater and G. Burtless (2001) ‘United States Poverty in a Cross-National Context’, in S.H. Danziger and R.H. Haveman (eds), Understanding Poverty, New York and Cambridge, MA, Russell Sage Foundation and Harvard University Press, pp. 162–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T.M. and L. Rainwater (2004) ‘Comparing Living Standards across Nations: Real Incomes at the Top, the Bottom and the Middle’, in E.N. Wolff (ed.), What Has Happened to the Quality of Life in the Advanced Industrialized Nations?, Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, E. and J. Appleton Gootman (2003) Working Families and Growing Kids: Caring for Children and Adolescents, Washington, DC, National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solon, G. (2002) ‘Cross-Country Differences in Intergenerational Earnings Mobility’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16: 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau (2003a) ‘Income in the United States: 2002’, Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, Current Population Reports, 60–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau (2003b) ‘Poverty in the United States 2002: Current Population Reports’, Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, Current Population Reports, 60–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau (2006) ‘Money, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance in the United States, 2005’, Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, Current Population Reports, P60–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre (2000) ‘A League Table of Child Poverty in Rich Nations’, Florence, UNICEF, Innocenti Report Card No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre (2005), ‘Child Poverty in Rich Countries 2005’, Florence, UNICEF, Innocenti Report Card No. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom Department of Work and Pensions (2004) ‘Opportunity for All: Sixth Annual Report 2004’, London, UK, Department of Work and Pensions.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom Department of Work and Pensions (2007) Households Below Average Income (HBAI) 1994/95–2005/06, London, Department for Work and Pensions, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (1998) Human Development Report 1998: Consumption for Human Development, New York, UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (1999) Human Development Report 1999: Globalisation with a Human Face, New York, UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. and M. Wiseman (2001) ‘The House that Jack Built: The Story of British Welfare Reform’, Milken Institute Review, Fourth Quarter: 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, F. (1999) ‘In Defense of Inequality’, American Economic Review, 89: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2005) ‘Globalisation and Its Impact on the Rhineland Social Model’, Presented at the European Investment Bank, Luxembourg, University Society of Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Teresa Munzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Timothy Smeeding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Naples, Italy

    Lilia Costabile M.Phil, PhD (Professor of Economics, Life Member) (Professor of Economics, Life Member)

  2. Clare Hall, Cambridge University, UK

    Lilia Costabile M.Phil, PhD (Professor of Economics, Life Member) (Professor of Economics, Life Member)

Copyright information

© 2008 Teresa Munzi and Timothy Smeeding

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Munzi, T., Smeeding, T. (2008). Conditions of Social Vulnerability, Work and Low Income: Evidence for Europe in Comparative Perspective. In: Costabile, L. (eds) Institutions for Social Well-Being. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584358_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation