Skip to main content

The Two-Level Logic of Non-State Market Driven Global Governance

  • Chapter
Authority in the Global Political Economy

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

The failure of governments and international institutions to effectively address significant global social and environmental problems has created a policy void that an array of voluntary, self-regulatory, shared governance and private arrangements are beginning to fill (Andrews 1998; Gunningham, Kagan and Thornton 2003; Harrison 1998; Howlett 2000; Rosenbaum 1995; Rosenau 2000; Ruggie 2004; Webb 2002). Despite increasing scholarly attention to these new policy arenas, most current research conflates these initiatives with what is arguably the most conceptually distinct and authoritative form of non-state global governance to arise in the last 50 years: non-state market driven (NSMD) governance systems (Cashore 2002). Their purpose is to develop socially and environmentally responsible practices in the marketplace by creating incentives and disincentives, through market supply chains, often through the use of a label that signals compliance to pre-established standards. Their distinctiveness is especially notable along two dimensions. First, they include governance institutions with decisionmaking and compliance mechanisms. Second, contrary to the vast majority of voluntary or self-regulatory initiatives, NSMD governance systems reject state sovereign authority, turning instead to markets (firms, consumers, as well as affected societal actors) for legitimacy to govern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews, R. (1998): Environmental Regulation and Business Self-Regulation. Policy Sciences 31 (September): 177–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K. and M. Saward (2004): Democratizing Global Environmental Governance? Stakeholder Democracy at the World Summit for Sustainable Development. Paper presented to the 5th Pan-European conference on International Relations. The Hague, September: 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, T. (2003): Certifying Forests and Factories: States, Social Movements, and the Rise of Private Regulation in the Apparel and Forest Products Fields. Politics & Society 31 (September): 433–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S. (2001): The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein S. and B. Cashore (2004): Non-State Global Governance: is Forest Certification a Legitimate Alternative to a Global Forest Convention? In: Kirton J. and M. Trebilcock (eds.), Hard Choices, Soft Law: Combining Trade, Environment, and Social Cohesion in Global Governance. London: Ashgate Press: 33–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodansky, D. (1999): The Legitimacy of International Governance: a Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law? American Journal of International Law 93 (July): 596–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A. and T. Risse (2005): Public-Private Partnerships: Effective and Legitimate Tools of Transnational Governance? In: Grande E. and W. P. Louis (eds.), Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the 21st Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press: 195–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. and P. Drahos (2000): Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, B. (2002): Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule-Making Authority. Governance 14 (October): 502–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, B., G. Auld, and D. Newsom (2004): Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-state Authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Seung Wha. (1997): GATTing a Green Trade Barrier: Eco-Labelling and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. Journal of World Trade 31 (February): 137–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chertow, M. R. and D. C. Esty (eds.) (1997): Thinking Ecologically: the Next Generation of Environmental Policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J. (1998): The Privatization of Global Environmental Governance: ISO 14000 and the Developing World. Global Governance 4 (August): 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochoy, F. (2003): The Industrial Roots of Contemporary Political Consumerism: the Case of the French Standardization Movement. In: Micheletti M., A. Føllesdal, and D. Stolle (eds.), Politics, Products, and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press: 145–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courville, S. (2003a): Social Accountability Audits: Challenging or Defending Democratic Governance? Law and Policy 25 (July): 269–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courville, S. (2003b): Understanding NGO-Based Social and Environmental Regulatory Systems: Why We Need New Models of Accountability. Paper read at ‘Accountability in a Complex World: Conceptualizing Constitutional and Regulatory Efficacy in the Face of Globalization and Privatized Governance’. New York, March: 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Azevedo, T. R. (2004): The Forest Stewardship Council: a Developing Country Per-spective. In: Kirton J. and M. Trebilcock (eds.), Hard Choices, Soft Law: Combining Trade, Environment, and Social Cohesion in Global Governance. London: Ashgate Press: 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, C., V. Haufler, and T. Porter (1999): Private Authority and International Affairs. In: Cutler C., V. Haufler and T. Porter (eds.), Private Authority in International Politics. New York: SUNY Press: 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drache, D. (ed.) (2001): The Market or the Public Domain. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, R. (2003): Private Environmental Governance and International Relations: Exploring the Links. Global Environmental Politics 3 (May): 72–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2003): Forest Products Statistical Data. See: www.fao.org/forestry/en

    Google Scholar 

  • Florini, A. (1996): The Evolution of International Norms. International Studies Quarterly 40 (September): 363–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FSC (2005): Estimated Size of FSC Global Market Revised to US$5 Billion. News Release. Document #: FSC-PUB-20–01–2005–04–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Johnson, R. (2001): Certification Institutions in the Protection of the Environment: Exploring the Implications for Governance. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy, Analysis, and Management. Washington DC, 1 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., R. Garcia-Johnson and E. Sasser (2001): The NGO-Industrial Complex. Foreign Policy 125 (July/August): 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (2005): www.globalreporting.org.

  • Göbel, T. (2004): Does Monitoring Entail Legitimacy? MNCs, Monitoring Mechanisms, and Three Stories About the Legitimacy of Codes of Conduct. MA Thesis, University of Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D. W., and B. Gray (1994): Testing a Model of Organizational Response to Social and Political Issues. Academy of Management Journal 37 (June): 467–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., R. A. Kagan, and D. Thornton (2003): Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N. and D. Sinclair (2002): Leaders and Laggards: Next-Generation Environmental Regulation. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., P. N. Grabosky, and D. Sinclair (1998): Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, K. (1998): Talking with the Donkey: Cooperative Approaches to Environmental Protection. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2 (Summer): 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haufler, V. (2001): A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. and M. Koenig-Archibugi (eds.) (2005): Global Governance and Public Accountability. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock, T. (2001): The Role of Eco-Labels in International Trade: Can Timber Certification be Implemented as a Means to Slowing Deforestation? Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 12 (Summer): 347–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2000): Managing the ‘Hollow State’: Procedural Policy Instruments and Modern Governance. Canadian Public Administration 43 (Winter): 412–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, M. (2004): Are Eco-Labels Consistent with World Trade Organization Agreements? Journal of World Trade 38 (February): 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. and K. Sikkink (1998): Activists Beyond Borders: Transnational Issue Networks in International Politics. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (1999): No Logo. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollman, K. and A. Prakash (2002): EMS-based Environmental Regimes as Club Goods: Examining Variations in Firm-level Adoption of ISO 14001 and EMAS in UKI, US, and Germany. Policy Sciences 35 (March): 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. and A. Linton (2003): Fair Trade: a Cup at a Time? Politics and Society 31 (September): 407–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marine Stewardship Council (2001): Conclusions of the MSC Governance Review. July (accessed August 2001, www.msc.org, but since removed from website).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. et al. (1997): World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology 103 (July): 144–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M., A. Frøllesdal, and D. Stolle (eds.) (2003): Politics, Products, and Markets. Exploring Political Consumerism Pastand Present. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, L. W., and S. Reich (1997): National Structures and Multinational Corporate Behaviour: Enduring Differences in the Age of Globalization. International Organization 51 (Winter): 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R. A. and N. H. Samhat: Democratizing Global Politics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peretti, J. (with M. Micheletti) (2003): The Nike Sweatshop Email: Political Consumerism, Internet, and Culture Jamming. In: Micheletti M., A. Føllesdal, and D. Stolle (eds.), Politics, Products, and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press: 127–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944): The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and C. van der Linde (1995): Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review 73 (September–October): 120–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. (2004): Compromises of Embedded Knowledges: Standards, Codes and Technical Authority in Global Governance. In: Bernstein, S. and L.W. Pauly (eds.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, A. (1999): A New-Institutional Perspective on ISO 14000 and Responsible Care. Business Strategy and the Environment 8 (November/December): 322–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, A. (2000): Responsible Care: an Assessment. Business and Society 39 (June): 183–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, A. (2001): Why do Firms Adopt ‘Beyond-Compliance’ Environmental Policies? Business Strategy and the Environment 10 (September/October): 286–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raines, S. Summers (2003): Perceptions of Legitimacy in International Environmental Management Standards: the Participation Gap. Global Environmental Politics 3 (August): 47–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, J. (2002): Assessing a Voluntary Environmental Initiative in the Developing World: the Costa Rican Certification for Sustainable Tourism. Policy Sciences 35 (December): 333–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, W. A. (1995): Environmental Politics and Policy. 3rd edn. Washington: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1995): Governance in the Twenty-first Century. Global Governance 1 (January–April): 13–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (2003): Distant Proximities: Dynamics Beyond Globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, P. Vaillancourt (eds.) (2000): Public-Private Policy Partnerships. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1982): International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 36 (Spring): 379–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (2002): The Theory and Practice of Learning Networks: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Global Compact. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 5 (Spring): 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (2003): Taking Embedded Liberalism Global: the Corporate Connection. In: Held D. and M. Koenig-Archibugi (eds.), Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance. Cambridge: Polity: 93–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (2004): Reconstituting the Global Public Domain — Issues, Actors, and Practices. European Journal of International Relations 10 (December): 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. and H. Jenkins-Smith (eds.) (1993): Policy Learning and Policy Change: an Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salaman, L. M. (2002): Introduction. In: The Tools of Government: a Guide to the New Governance. New York: Oxford University Press: 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, E. (2002): The Certification Solution: NGO Promotion of Private, Voluntary Self-Regulation. Paper presented to the 74th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association. Toronto, May: 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, E. (2003): Gaining Leverage: NGO Influence on Certification Institutions in the Forest Products Sector. In: Teeter L., B. Cashore and D. Zhang (eds.), Forest Policy for Private Forestry. Wallingford, UK: CAB International: 220–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, E. et al. (2004): Direct Targeting as an NGO Political Strategy: Examining Private Authority Regimes in the Forestry Sector. Paper presented to the Association of Public Policy Analysis and Management. Washington DC, Nov.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995): Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 20 (July): 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallejo, N. and P. Hauselmann (2004): Governance and Multistakeholder Processes. New York: Sustainable Commodity Initiative, a Joint Venture of UNCTAD and IISD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, H. (1997): Trade and Environment Issues in Voluntary Eco-labelling and Life Cycle Analysis. RECIEL 6 (July): 139–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, K. (ed.) (2002): Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation. Ottawa: Carleton University Research Unit on Innovation, Science and the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S. (1994): Origins of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. International Organization 48 (Winter): 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, C. (2004): Enhancing Global Governance: Corporate Social Responsibility International Trade and Investment Framework. In: Kirton J. and M. Trebilcock (eds.), Hard Choices, Soft Law: Combining Trade, Environment, and Social Cohesion in Global Governance. London: Ashgate Press: 297–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N. (1999): Good Governance in International Organizations. Global Governance 5 (January–March): 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2000): Committee Tackles Market Access Issues. Trade and Environment Bulletin 32 (17 March) available at www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/te032_e.htm.

  • WTO (2002): Statistics: International Trade Statistics 2002. Trade by Sector. See: www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2002_e/its02_bysector_e.htm

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Steven Bernstein, Benjamin Cashore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bernstein, S., Cashore, B. (2008). The Two-Level Logic of Non-State Market Driven Global Governance. In: Rittberger, V., Nettesheim, M., Huckel, C. (eds) Authority in the Global Political Economy. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584297_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics