Skip to main content

Poverty, Pro-Poor Growth and Mobility: A Decomposition Framework with Application to China

  • Chapter
Understanding Inequality and Poverty in China

Part of the book series: Studies in Development Economics and Policy ((SDEP))

  • 482 Accesses

Abstract

In reviewing the current status of poverty research, Thorbecke (2004) noted that most unresolved issues in poverty analysis are related to the dynamics of poverty. One approach to understanding the dynamics of poverty is to decompose the changes of poverty over time, captured by changes in a particular poverty measure, into their two proximate contributing factors: the growth of average income and shifts in the distribution of income (Datt and Ravallion 1992).1 While a change in the poverty measure represents the total gains (or losses) to the poor, the distributional component of the decomposition can be interpreted as an indication of whether and to what extent aggregate income growth has been ‘pro-poor’. If the distributional component is negative (that is, poverty reducing), the poor are said to have benefited more than pro-portionately from income growth and, as a result, increased their share of total income.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, A.B. (1987) ‘On the Measurement of Poverty’, Econometrica, 55: 749–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bane, M.J. and Ellwood, D. (1986) ‘Slipping Into and Out of Poverty: The Dynamics of Spells’, Journal of Human Resources, 21: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datt, G. and Ravallion, M. (1992) ‘Growth and Redistribution Components of Changes in Poverty Measures: A Decomposition With Applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s’, Journal of Development Economics, 38: 275–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalan, J. and Ravallion, M. (1998) ‘Transient Poverty in Post-Reform Rural China’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 26: 338–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S.P. (2000) ‘Modelling Household Income Dynamics’, Journal of Population Economics, 13: 529–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S.P. and Van Kerm, P. (2003) ‘Trends in Income Inequality, Pro-Poor Income Growth and Income Mobility’, IZA Discussion Papers 904 (Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labour).

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, L. and Xu, K. (2000) ‘International Comparisons of Poverty Intensity: Index Decomposition and Bootstrap Inference’, Journal of Human Resources, 35: 51–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, L. and Xu, K. (2002) ‘The Social Welfare Implications, Decomposability, and Geometry of the Sen Family of Poverty Indices’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 35, 1: 138–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, L. and Xu, K. (2006) ‘How Should We Measure Global Poverty in a Changing World?’, WIDER Research Paper RP2006/64 (Helsinki: UNU-WIDER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2004) ‘Pro-Poor Growth: A Primer’, Policy Research Working Paper 3242 (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. and Chen, S. (2003) ‘Measuring Pro-Poor Growth’, Economics Letters, 78: 93–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. and Chen, S. (2004) ‘China’s (Uneven) Progress Against Poverty’, Policy Research Working Paper 3408 (Washington DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1976) ‘Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement’, Econometrica, 44: 219–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, A.F. (1995) ‘Revisiting the Sen Poverty Index’, Econometrica, 63: 1225–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, A.F. (1999) ‘Decomposition Procedures for Distributional Analysis: A Unified Framework Based on the Shapley Value’, Mimeo, University of Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Yearbook of China (2003) (Beijing: State Statistical Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A.H. (1994) ‘Persistence in Poverty and Welfare: The Dynamics of Poverty Spells: Updating Bane and Ellwood’, American Economic Review, 84: 34–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorbecke, E. (2004) ‘Conceptual and Measurement Issues in Poverty Analysis’, Discussion Paper 2004/04 (Helsinki: UNU-WIDER).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 United Nations University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhang, Y., Wan, G. (2008). Poverty, Pro-Poor Growth and Mobility: A Decomposition Framework with Application to China. In: Wan, G. (eds) Understanding Inequality and Poverty in China. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584259_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics