Skip to main content

Personnage: History, Philology, Performance

  • Chapter
Shakespeare and Character

Part of the book series: Palgrave Shakespeare Studies ((PASHST))

Abstract

René Descartes’ depiction of the world as a stage inhabited by characters echoes Shakespeare’s Jaques: “All the world’s a stage, / And all the men and women merely players; / They have their exits and their entrances, / And one man in his time plays many parts” (As You Like It, 2.7.139–43).2 The similarity of these metaphors reveals a common idea in early modern France and England. In effect, over time, the words theatrun mun, with the common alternatives amphitheatrum and even globe, took on the meanings of a meeting place for performance; but also as a global vision, whose textual realization was a series of compendia, the first of which was Pierre de Launay’s anthology of European poetry, Theatrum mundi.3

Like actors who, trained not to show any shyness on the face, wear a mask, so too I, at the moment of entering onto the stage of the world where until now I lived as a spectator, goforward masked.

—René Descartes, Larvatus prodeo, 16181

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Maurice Nédoncelle, “Prosopon et persona dans l’antiquité classique: Essai de bilan linguistique,” Revue des Sciences Religieuses, 22 (1948), 277–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. See Roger D. Haight, Jesus: Symbol of God (New York: Orbis Books, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Volker Klotz, Geschlossene und offene Form im Drama [Closed and Open Form in Drama] (Munich: Hanser, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Patrice Pavis, Dictionnaire du théâtre (Paris: Messidor / Éditions sociales, 1987), 175.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pierre Francastel, La Réalité figurative (Paris: Gonthier, 1965), 237–38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Paulo Scarpi, Le religioni dei misteri (Milan: Mondadori, 2002), vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Henry G. Liddle and Robert Scott, Lexicon: Abridged from Greek-English Lexicon (London: Oxford University Press, 1963), 402, 719. The term “comedy” is thus related to kwmoi, farandole, a Provençal dance.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pierre Berthiaume, “Trugoidia: le chant de la lie. À propos de la fonction sociale de la comédie ancienne,” L’Annuaire théâtral, 15 (1994), 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jelle Koopsmans and Paul Verhuyck, Sermon joyeux et truanderie (Villon— Nemo—Ulespiègle) (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1987), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Some analysts established an absolute system that Gremias presented as a research intuition: “hypothesis of an actantial model envisioned as one of the possible principles of the organisation of the semantic universe … If we wanted to question the possible uses, as a structuring hypothesis, of this operational model, we would have to start by one observation: wanting to compare the syntactical categories to the inventories of [Vladimir] Propp and [Étienne] Souriau obliged us to consider the relationship between the subject and the object … as a more specialized relationship consisting of a heavier semic investment of ‘desire’, transforming, at the level of demonstrated functions, into ‘quest.”’ Algirdas J. Greimas, Sémantique structurale (Paris: Larousse, 1966), 174, 180–81.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henri Bergson, L’évolution créatrice (Paris: PUF, 2001), 120.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Ferdinand de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale, ed. Tullio de Muro (Paris: Payot et Rivages, 1995), 32.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hannah Arendt, Condition de l’homme moderne (Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1988), 235.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bertolt Brecht, Petit Organon pour le théâtre, suivi de Additifs au Petit Organon (Paris: L’Arche, 1978), 92.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbert Turp, “Le troisième lieu de la théâtralité: Essai sur la représentation de l’immanence et l’expérience affective de la connaissance,” L’Annuaire théâtral 19–20 (1996), 24–71, quote at 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 André G. Bourassa

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bourassa, A.G. (2009). Personnage: History, Philology, Performance. In: Yachnin, P., Slights, J. (eds) Shakespeare and Character. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584150_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics