Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Palgrave Shakespeare Studies ((PASHST))

Abstract

Character has made a comeback. Having all but disappeared from Shakespeare criticism as an analytic category in the second half of the twentieth century, the idea of character has now begun to reemerge as an important—perhaps even an essential—way of thinking about the political, ethical, historical, literary, and performative aspects of early modern theater. The present volume recognizes the development in Shakespeare studies of what might best be termed a “new character criticism,” by bringing together of a group of scholars whose work touches in one way or another on the fundamental question: what is character? That these scholars approach the question from a wide variety of perspectives and with disparate methodological tools suggests how valuable their answers might be to an increasingly interdisciplinary study of Shakespeare’s plays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Anna Murphy Jameson, Shakespeare’s Heroines (1832), ed. Cheri L. Larsen Hoeckley. (Broadview, 2005), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The practice of “character assassination” was particularly popular several decades ago. Among the most influential works were Francis Barker, The Tremulous Private Body (New York: Methuen 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jonathan Dollimore, Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology, and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Catherine Belsey, The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama (London: Routledge, 1985). More recent work has prosecuted the case against character with greater theoretical sophistication, interpretive nuance, and historical depth.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See especially Margreta de GraziaHamlet without Hamlet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jonathan Goldberg, “Shakespearean Inscriptions: The Voicing of Power,” in Shakespeare and the Question of Theory, eds Patricia Parker and Geoffrey Hartman (New York: Methuen, 1985), 118–19.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peter Stallybrass, “Patriarchal Territories: The Body Enclosed,” in Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe, eds Margaret Ferguson et al. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), 123–42, at 141.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Katharine Maus, Inwardness and Theater in the English Renaissance (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Theodore B. Leinwand, Theatre, Finance and Society in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wes Folkerth, The Sound of Shakespeare (London and New York: Routledge, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leonard Digges, “Poets are borne not made,” in Riverside Shakespeare, ed. G. Blakemore Evans (2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997), 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The phrase “double-voiced” is from M. M. Bakhtin, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. M. Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981), 324.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Henry Jackson, [Othello at Oxford, 1610], quoted and translated in Riverside Shakespeare, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a discussion of the person as the measure of meaning-making in Shakespeare, see Paul Yachnin, “Personations: The Taming of the Shrew and the Limits of Theoretical Criticism,” Early Modern Literary Studies 2.1 (1996): 2.1–31 <URL: http://purl.ocic.org/emis/02–1/yachshak.html>.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bruce Boehrer, Shakespeare Among the Animals: Nature and Society in the Drama of Early Modern England (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), 26.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Paul Yachnin and Jessica Slights

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yachnin, P., Slights, J. (2009). Introduction. In: Yachnin, P., Slights, J. (eds) Shakespeare and Character. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584150_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics