Abstract
Uniformity in modes of governance of the firm is now widely debated. So far, the predominant thesis was that there should be a superior model promoting optimality by disclosure of information and transparency. But today this thesis is greatly contested, since the adoption of a unique and universal set of rules and arrangements neglects the diversity and heterogeneity of firms, industries, as well as institutional contexts (Becht et al., 2005). Moreover, evidence shows that this unique model of governance tends to generate major failures and turbulence, especially in innovative industries (Fransman, 2002; Lazonick and O’Sullivan, 2002; Krafft and Ravix, 2005). What emerges as a result is that different types of rules and norms should govern differently entrepreneurial as well as public firms, depending on the industry in which they operate and the stage of development of this industry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aghion, P. and P. Bolton, ‘An Incomplete Contracts Approach to Financial Contracting’, Review of Economic Studies, 59(3) (1992), 473–94.
Antonelli, C., The Economics of Innovation, New Technology and Structural Change London: (Routledge, 2003).
Audretsch, D., ‘Innovation, Growth and Survival’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4) (1995), 441–58.
Audretsch, D. and E. Lehmann, ‘Entrepreneurial Access and Absorption of Knowledge Spillovers: Strategic Board and Managerial Composition for Competitive Advantage’, Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2) (2006), 155–66.
Becht, M., T. Jenkinson and C. Mayer, ‘Corporate Governance: an Assessment’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2) (2005), 155–63.
Chatterjee, S. and B. Wernerfelt, ‘The Link between Resources and Type of Diversification: Theory and Evidence’, Strategic Management Journal, 12(1) (1991), 33–48.
Chesbrough, H., Open Innovation: the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 2003).
Dosi, L. and F. Malerba (eds), ‘Special Issue: Interpreting Industrial Dynamics 20 Years after Nelson and Winter’s Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4) (2002), 3–202.
Foss, N., ‘Theories of the Firm: Competence and Strategy Perspectives’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3(2) (1993), 127–44.
Foss N., ‘Cooperation is Competition: George Richardson on Coordination and Interfirm Relations’, British Review of Economic Issues, 16(40) (1994), 25–51.
Foss, N. and J. Christensen, ‘A Market Process Approach to Corporate Coherence’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 22(4-5) (2001), 213–26.
Fransman, M., Telecoms in the Internet Age: From Boom to Bust to... (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
Friedman, D., ‘Equilibrium in Evolutionary Games: Some Experimental Results’, Economic Journal, 106(434) (1996), 1–25.
Geroski, P., ‘What do we Know about Entry?’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4) (1995), 421–40.
Gompers, P., ‘Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture Capital’, Journal of Finance, 50(5) (1995), 1461–90.
Gompers, P. ‘Grandstanding in the Venture Capital Industry’, Journal of Financial Economics, 42(1) (1996), 133–56.
Gompers, P. and J. Lerner, ‘The Venture Capital Revolution’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2) (2001), 145–68.
Gort, M. and S. Klepper, ‘Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations’, Economic Journal, 92(367) (1982), 630–53.
Grossman, S. and O. Hart, ‘The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: a Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration’, Journal of Political Economy, 94(4) (1986), 691–720.
Hart, O., Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995a).
Hart, O., ‘Corporate Governance: Some Theory and Implications’, Economic Journal, 105(430) (1995b), 678–89.
Hart, O. and J. Moore, ‘Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation’, Econometrica, 56(4) (1988), 755–86.
Jensen, M. and W. Meckling, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4) (1976), 305–60.
Kandori, M., G.J. Mailath and R. Rob, ‘Learning, Mutation and Long-Run Equilibria in Games’, Econometrica, 61(1) (1993), 29–56.
Kaplan, S. and P. Stroemberg, ‘Financial Contracting Theory Meets the Real World: an Empirical Analysis of Venture Capital Contracts’, Review of Economic Studies, 70(243) (2003), 281–315.
Kaplan, S. and P. Stroemberg, ‘Characteristics, Contracts, and Actions: Evidence from Venture Capitalist Analyses’, Journal of Finance, 59(5) (2004), 2177–210.
Klein, P. and S. Klein, ‘Do Entrepreneurs Make Predictable Mistakes? Evidence from Corporate Divestitures’, in N.J. Foss and P.G. Klein (eds), Entrepreneur-ship and the Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002).
Klepper, S., ‘Industry Life Cycles’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1) (1997), 119–43.
Krafft, J., ‘What do We Know about Industrial Dynamics? Introduction to the Special Issue’, Revue de VOFCE, June.
Krafft, J. and J.L. Ravix, ‘The Governance of Innovative Firms: an Evolutionary Perspective’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(3) (2005), 125–48.
Krafft, J. and J.L. Ravix, ‘Corporate Governance and the Governance of Knowledge: Rethinking the Relationship in Terms of Corporate Coherence’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(1), (2008).
Lazonick, W. and M. O’Sullivan (eds), Corporate Governance and Sustainable Prosperity (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).
Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo, ‘The Dynamics of Evolution of Industry’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(1), 51–87.
Penrose, E., The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (London: Basil Blackwell, 1959).
Piscitello, L., ‘Corporate Diversification, Coherence and Economic Performance’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(5) (2004), 757–87.
Samuelson, L., Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection (Cambridge, Mass. and London: MIT Press, 1997).
Saviotti, P.P., Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996).
Schleifer, A. and R. Vishny, ‘A Survey on Corporate Governance’, Journal of Finance, 52(2) (1997), 737–83.
Teece, D. ‘Profiting from Innovation’, Research Policy, 15(6) (1986), 285–305.
Teece, D. and G. Pisano, ‘The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3) (1994), 537–56.
Teece, D., G. Pisano and A. Shuen, 1997, ‘Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7) (1997), 509–33.
Weibull, J., Evolutionary Game Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995).
Williamson, O., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press, 1985).
Williamson, O., ‘The Institutions of Governance’, American Economic Review, 88(2) (1998), 75–9.
Williamson, O., ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3) (2000), 595–614.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Jackie Krafft and Jacques-Laurent Ravix
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krafft, J., Ravix, JL. (2008). The Firm and its Governance over the Industry Life Cycle. In: Laperche, B., Uzunidis, D. (eds) Powerful Finance and Innovation Trends in a High-Risk Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584099_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584099_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36341-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58409-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)