Skip to main content

Meeting the Challenge of Leading in the 21st Century: Beyond the ‘Deficit Model’ of Leadership Development

  • Chapter
Leadership Learning

Abstract

If the importance now afforded ‘leadership’ rather than ‘management’ reflects more than a fad in the contemporary Zeitgeist, to what might that shift be attributed? Furthermore, as leadership developers concerned with how best to enable leaders to fulfil their roles effectively, how should such a shift be influencing our own practice? This chapter sets out, if not to answer these questions definitively, then to map some of the theoretical and practical territory which informs them. In so doing, we suggest characteristics of leadership development interventions which might complement approaches which have been more typically used but which might not so readily address the needs of those taking up leadership roles in these demanding and complex times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • D. Armstrong, ‘The Institution in the mind: Reflections on the relation of psychoanalysis to the work of organisations’, Free Associations, 7(1) (1997) 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • B.J. Avolio, W.L. Gardner and F.O. Walumbwa, ‘Preface’, in W.L. Gardner, B.J. Avolio and F.O. Walumbwa (eds), Authentic Leadership Theory and Practice: Origins, Effects and Development (Vol. 3, pp. xxi–xxix) (Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • B.M. Bass, Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations (New York: Free Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Briggs Myers and P. Briggs, Gifts Differing (New York: Davies Black, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Clarkson, Gestalt Counselling in Action (London: Sage, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Conger, ‘The Brave new world of leadership training’, Organisational Dynamics (21)3 (1993) 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Cooperrider and W. Srivastva, ‘Appreciative inquiry in organisational life’, in R. Woodman and W. Pasmore (eds), Research in Organisational Change and Development Vol. 1 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1982) pp. 129–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Cotter, ‘Using bioenergetics to develop managers’, Journal of Management Development, 15(3) (1996) 3–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Day, ‘Leadership development: a review in context’, Leadership Quarterly, 11(4) (2001) 581–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Drath, The Deep Blue Sea: Rethinking the Source of Leadership (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Fiedler, A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.K. Fletcher, ‘The Greatly exaggerated demise of heroic leadership: Gender, power and the myth of the female advantage’, in R. Ely, E. Foldy and M. Scully (eds), Reader in work, gender and organisation (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003) pp. 204–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.J. Gould, L. Stapley and M. Stein, Experiential Learning in Organisations: Applications of the Tavistock Group Relations Approach (Karnac: London, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • D.E. Gray, ‘Executive coaching: Towards a dynamic alliance of psychotherapy and transformational learning processes’, Management Learning, 37(4) (2006) 475–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Greenleaf, Servant as Leader (Center for Applied Studies, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Gronn, ‘Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis’, Leadership Quarterly, 13 (2002) 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Heron, Co-operative Inquiry (London: Sage, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hersey and K. Blanchard, Management of Organisational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Khuruna, Searching for a Corporate Savior: The Irrational Quest for Charismatic CEOs (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • I. McDermott and W. Jago, The NLP Coach (London: Piakis, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Miller, The ‘Leicester Model’: Experiential Study of Group and Organisational Processes. Occasional Paper No 10 (London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mockler, ‘Using the arts to acquire and enhances managerial skills’, Journal of Management Development, 26 (2002) 574–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Neumann and L. Hirschhorn, ‘The challenge of integrating psychodynamic and organisational theory’, Human Relations, 52(6) (1999) 683–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Newton, S. Long and B. Sievers, Coaching in Depth: The Organisational Role Analysis Approach (London: Karnac, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Raelin, Creating Leaderful Organisations: How to Bring Out Leadership in Everyone (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Raelin, ‘Toward an epistemology of practice’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, (6)4 (2007) 495–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Reason and J. Rowan, Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research (London: John Wiley & Sons, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Stogdill, ‘Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature’, Journal of Psychology, 25 (1948) 35–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Szekely and M. Knirsch, ‘Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: Metrics for sustainability performance’, European Managementjournal (23)6 (2005) 628–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Tannenbaum and W.H. Schmidt, ‘How to choose a leadership pattern; should a manager be democratic or autocratic — or something in between?’, Harvard Business Review, 37 (1958) 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Taylor and D. Ladkin, ‘Understanding arts-based methods within manager development’, Academy of Management Learning and Education (2008), in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Turnbull James and J.S. Collins (eds), Leadership Perspectives: Knowledge into Action (London: Palgrave, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wheatley, Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World — 2nd Edition (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • S.J. Zaccaro and R.J. Klimoski, The Nature of Organisational Leadership (San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Kim Turnbull James and Donna Ladkin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

James, K.T., Ladkin, D. (2008). Meeting the Challenge of Leading in the 21st Century: Beyond the ‘Deficit Model’ of Leadership Development. In: James, K.T., Collins, J. (eds) Leadership Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584075_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics