Abstract
Alaw was enacted in 1856 abrogating an earlier legal and prescriptive prohibition against the remarriage of Hindu widows. This law also underwrote the inheritance rights of sons born of remarriage.1 Even though a colonial legislature had enacted the law—a legislature where Indians were not represented—the idea of remarriage had originated among a small group of Bengali reformers who had approached and persuaded some members of the Legislative Council. Remarriage was then furiously debated as an issue in the public sphere in most parts of India for the rest of the century. I will underline some of the significant features of the discipline of Hindu widowhood, and then relate these to the debates on remarriage, in order to explore the implications of the reform for a normative system of social power.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
H.H. Risley, The Tribes and Castes of Bengal (Calcutta: 1891, rpnt. 1981).
Tanika Sarkar, Hindu Wife, Hindu Nation: Community, Religion, and Cultural Nationalism (Delhi: 2000), pp. 43–4.
Sambhuchandra Vidyaratna, Vidyasagar Jivancarit (Calcutta: 1891, rpnt. 1992), pp. 42–3.
Rajnarain Bose, in Baridbaran Ghose, ed., Rajnarain Bose: Nirbachita Bangla Rachana Samgraha (Calcutta: 1908, rpnt. 1995, pp. 50–1.
Madhu Kishwar, ‘Daughters of Aryavarta’, in J. Krishnamurty, ed., Women in Colonial India: Essyas on Survival Work and the State (Delhi: 1989).
Kumkum Sangari and Sudesh Vaid, eds, Recasting Women: Essays in Colonial History (Delhi: 1989).
Paul Gilroy, The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness (Cambridge: 1993).
Prasannakumar Sharma, Bidhababibaha Shastrabirudhha (Mymensingh: 1886), p. 47.
See Mrinalini Sinha, ‘Potent Protest: The Age of Consent Controversy in 1891’, in Colonial Masculinity: The ‘Manly’ Englishman and the ‘Effeminate Bengali’ in the Late Nineteenth Century (Manchester: 1995). Also Tanika Sarkar, Conjugality and Hindu Nationalism, in Hindu Wife op. cit.
M.K. Jain, Outline of Indian Legal History (Bombay: 1969), pp. 554–710.
Archana Parashar, Women and Family Law Reform in India (Delhi: 1992), p. 67.
See Sumit Sarkar. ‘The Complexities of Young Bengal’, in A Critique of Colonial India (Calcutta: 1985).
G.A. Oddie, Missionaries, Rebellions and Proto Nationalism: James Long of Bengal, 1814–87 (London: 1999).
Kantichandra Rarhi, ed., Nabadwip Mahima (Calcutta: 1937), p. 193.
Also Sureshchandra Bandyopadhyaya, Smritishastre Bangali (Calcutta: 1961), p. 71.
R.C. Majumdar, Maharaja Rajballabh (Calcutta: 1947), p. 91.
Ishanchandra Bidyabagish, Ekadashivyavastha (Boalia: 1868).
See Rev. James Long, ed., Prabadmala (Calcutta: 1872, rpnt. 1979).
Tarakrishna Haldar, Chamatkar Swapnadarshan (Calcutta: 1868).
John R. McLane, Land and Local Kingship in Eighteenth Century Bengal (Cambridge: 1993).
Krishnakamini Dasi, Chittabilashini (Calcutta: 1856).
See Jogindranath Tarkachuramani, The Remarriage of Aryan Ladies Confuted (Calcutta: 1859).
Prasannakumar Sharma, Bidhababibaha Shastrabiruddha (Mymensingh: 1887);
Koylash Chunder Tarkaratna, Ritimul (Hooghly: 1862);
Tarakrishna Haldar, Chamatkar Swapnadarshan (Calcutta: 1868).
Umeschandra Mitra, Bidhababibaha Natak (Calcutta: 1856).
Bankimchandra Chattopadhyay, Bishabriksha (Calcutta: 1873), and Rabindranath Tagore, Chokher Bali (Calcutta: 1903), among many others.
Ranajit Guha, ‘Chandra’s Deaths’; in Guha, ed., Subaltern Studies V (Delhi: 1987).
Bidisha Chakravarty, Sarkari Nathite Unish Shatake Banglar Nari (Calcutta: 2002).
Pradip K. Datta, Carving Blocs: Communal Ideology in Early Twentieth Century Bengal (Delhi: 1999).
Bamasundari Dasi, ‘What Are the Superstitions that Must Be Removed from the Betterment of Our Country?’ Reproduced in Malini Bhattacharya and Abhijit Sen, eds, Talking of Power: Early Writings of Women in Bengal (Calcutta: Stree, 2004).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Tanika Sarkar
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sarkar, T. (2008). Wicked Widows: Law and Faith in Nineteenth-Century Public Sphere Debates. In: Ghosh, A. (eds) Behind the Veil. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583672_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583672_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36317-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58367-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)