Skip to main content

Unintentional Humour in Oligarkh and Antikiller, or How New Are the ‘New Russians’?

  • Chapter
Politics and the Ruling Group in Putin’s Russia

Part of the book series: Studies in Central and Eastern Europe ((SCEE))

  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

The term‘unintentional humour’ is frequently invoked when something that was not meant to be funny is perceived as such. Remarkably, an atmosphere of this kind permeates the debate about the so-called ‘new Russian’ phenomenon which began to emerge in the USSR at about the time of its breakdown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, Bruce. 2005. Tiny Revolutions in Russia: Twentieth-century Soviet and Russian History in Anecdotes, New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazan, Guy. 2002. ‘Exiled Russian Tycoon Berezovsky Looks Better on Film in Oligarkh’, Wall Street Journal, 18 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dondurei, D. 1995. ‘Kinematografisty o “novykh russkikh”’, Iskusstvo kino, 1: 25–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubov. Iu. 2003. Bol’shaia paika. Moscow: Vagrius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iusipova, L. 2003. ‘Avtoprobegom po kinokasse’, Vedomosti, 9 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, I. 2003. ‘Svoi sredi chuzhikh’, Versiia, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandyba, I. 1998. ‘V Moskvu na zarabotki’, Izvestiia, 15 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakhan, L. 2002. ‘Pavel Lungin—Aleksandr Timofeevsky: Konets dinozavrov’, Iskusstvo kino, 4: 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamysheva, L. 2002. ‘Danil Koretskii: Ia—za vozvrashchenie k smertnoi kazni’, Trud, 11 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiselev, E. 2003. ‘Zachem kino?’, Moskovskie novosti, 11 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klebnikov, Paul. 2000. Godfather of the Kremlin: Boris Berezovsky and the Looting of Russia, New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komm, D. 2002. ‘Uzhe ne protokol’, Iskusstvo kino, 12: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unintentional Humour in Oligarkh and Antikiller 171

    Google Scholar 

  • Konovalov, V. 2003. ‘Danil Koretsky, pisatel’: Sobralis’ kak-to professor, pisatel’ i ment’, Izvestiia, 6 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koretsky, D. 2003. Antikiller, Moscow: Eksmo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlova, T. V. 1999. ‘“Novye russkie”: poniatie i diskurs’, in V. N. Teliia, ed. Frazeologiia v kontekste kul’tury, Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kul’tury, pp. 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladnyi, V. 1999. ‘Danil Koretsky: Iskorenit’ prestupnost’? Ne bylo komandy!’, Komsomol’skaia pravda, 30 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, A. 1995. ‘Chego strarye intelligenty ne dali “New Russians”’, Iskusstvo kino, 1: 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limonov, E. 2003. Kontrol’nyi vystrel, Moscow: Ul’traKul’tura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipovetsky, Mark. 2003. ‘New Russians as a Cultural Myth’, Russian Review, 61(1): 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskvina, T. 2002. ‘Eto ne Berezovsky’, Moskovskie novosti, 17 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzyria, O. 1998. ‘Ia—novyi russkii. Etim i interesen’, Izvestiia, 5 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichiporovich, T. G., ed. 1999. Anekdoty o novykh russkikh, Minsk: Literatura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piliia, V. 1995. ‘Ia by pozhelal tvorcheskim liudiam—goloda’, Iskusstvo kino, 1: 84–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, A. 2003. ‘“Novyi russkii”: Stolichnoe i provintsial’noe v kul’turnom kontsepte’, Europa Orientalis, 1: 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponomarev, V. T. 1996. Biznes-sleng dlia novykh russkikh: Slovar’-spravochnik, Donetsk: Stalker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanov, S. 1997. Malinovye pidzhaki, ili Vse o novykh russkikh, Moscow: Veche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalamov, V. 1978. Kolymskie rasskazy, London: Overseas Publications Interchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shemiakin, A. 1995. ‘Novaia klassika dlia “novykh russkikh”’, Iskusstvo kino, 9: 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, A. 1999. ‘Dobro dolzhno byt’ s pistoletom’, Segodnia, 6 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solntseva, A. 2002. ‘Mif ob Oligarkhe prikovannom i kovarnom Kremle’, Vremia novostei, 19 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkov, V. 2001. ‘Khochu, chtoby v Rossii vse stali “novymi russkimi”’, Argumenty i fakty, 14 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timofeevsky, A. 1995. ‘“Novye russkie” razrushaiut to, chto eshche ne razrusheno’, Iskusstvo kino, 1: 62–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tregubova, Ye. 2002. ‘“Trakhaiutsia oni tam nepravil’no!”’, Kommersant-Daily, 19 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tregubova, Ye. 2003. Baiki kremlevskogo diggera, Moscow: Ad Marginem.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Andrei Rogachevsky

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogachevsky, A. (2008). Unintentional Humour in Oligarkh and Antikiller, or How New Are the ‘New Russians’?. In: White, S. (eds) Politics and the Ruling Group in Putin’s Russia. Studies in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583061_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics