Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Social Policy in a Development Context ((SPDC))

  • 75 Accesses

Abstract

One of the most contentious political issues in the United Kingdom in the second half of the twentieth century was the relationship between individual citizens and the state. In the years immediately following the Second World War a consensus emerged between the main political parties on the role of the state as a provider to citizens of a range of goods and services — particularly those associated with the utility industries — in order to achieve specific distributional ends.1 By the mid-1970s, however, doubts were being raised by leading politicians2 about the efficacy of public corporations in meeting redistributive or other social obligations, and the consensus began to break down. The 1979 election, of a Conservative administration committed to changing the relationship between the citizen and the state marked the beginning of a period in which alternatives to the public sector provision of goods and services were explored. A technically challenging and politically ambitious privatization programme followed, in which many nationalized industries, including some but not all of the utilities (previously considered the exclusive preserve of the state), were restructured, divested of particular social obligations, given clearer economic objectives, made subject to new forms of economic regulation, and sold to private sector investors.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, M., S. Cowan andJ. Vickers (1994) Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K. (2003) An Uncooperative Commodity: Privatizing Water in England and Wales (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K.J. (2001) ‘Paying for Water: Water Pricing and Equity in England and Wales’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(2), 143–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M., A. Goodman, A. Muriel and L. Sibieta (2007) Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2007. IFS Briefing Note No. 73, Institute for Fiscal Studies.http://www.ifs.org.uk/bns/bn73.pdf, accessed on 5 June 2007.

  • British Medical Association (1994) Water–A Vital Resource (London: British Medical Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries (1994) The UK Water Industry Charges for Water Services 1994/95 (London: CIPFA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Citro, C. and R. Michael (eds) (1995) Measuring Poverty: A New Approach (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2004a) Quality of Life Counts Update 2004 (London: DEFRA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2001) The UK Fuel Poverty Strategy (London: DEFRA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Work and Pensions (2004a) The Abstract of Statistics 2003 Edition (London: Information and Analysis Directorate, Information Centre, Department for Work and Pensions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Work and Pensions (2004b) Households Below Average Income 2002/3 (London: Department for Work and Pensions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Work and Pensions, Office for National Statistics. Social Survey Division and National Centre for Social Research (2005) Family Resources Survey, 2003–2004 [computer file] (Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], April, SN: 5139).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1998a) Water Charging in England and Wales–A New Approach: Consultation Paper (London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998b) Water Charging in England and Wales: Government Decisions Following Consultation (London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998c) The Review of the Water Abstraction Licensing System in England and Wales: Consultation Paper (London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1999a) Taking Water Responsibly: Government Decisions Following Consultation on Changes to the Water Abstraction Licensing System in England and Wales (London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1999b) Water Industry Act 1999: Consultation on Regulations (London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Social Security, Office for National Statistics Social Survey Division, Social and Community Planning Research, Family Resources Survey, 1997–1998 [computer file], 2nd Edition (Colchester, Essex. The Data Archive [distributor], 22 September 2000, SN: 4068).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Social Security/Benefits Agency (1999) Income Support Guide IS20 from November 1999 (London: Benefits Agency).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry (1998a) A Fair Deal for Consumers: Modernising the Framework for Utility Regulation (London: Department of Trade and Industry).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry (1998b) A Fair Deal for Consumers: Mod-ernising the Framework for Utility Regulation: Response to Consultation (London: Department of Trade and Industry).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, M. (2002) Water Poverty in England and Wales. Working Paper (Leicester: Centre for Utility Consumer Law, University of Leicester).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, M. (1998) Water Charities. Working Paper 6/98 (Leicester: Centre for Utility Consumer Law, University of Leicester).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, J., P. Nunn, J. Tomkins and I. Fraser (eds) (1996) The European Water Environment in a Period of Transformation (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Healthmatters (1994), Issue 18, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healthmatters (1993), Issue 14, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, A. and E. Kempson (1995) Water Debt and Disconnection (London: Policy Studies Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee (2003), Water Pricing. First Report of Session 2003–2004, HC121 (London: TSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J.A. and D.J. Thompson (1986) ‘Privatisation: a Policy in Search of a Rationale’, Economic Journal 96, 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempson, E. and F. Bennett (1997) Local Living Costs: Variations in the Costs Borne by Low Income Households (London: Policy Studies Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • McClements, L. (1977) ‘Equivalence Scales for Children’, Journal of Public Economics 8, 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1999) Household Water Pricing in OECD Countries (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1987) Pricing of Water Services (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat (various) Annual Reports (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat (2005) Tariff Structure and Charges 2005–2006 Report (Birmingham: Ofwat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat (2000) Tariff Structure and Charges 2000–01 Report (Birmingham: Ofwat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat (1997) 1997–98 Report on Tariff Structure and Charges (Birmingham: Ofwat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat (1993) The Distributional Effects of Different Methods of Charging Households for Water and Sewerage (Birmingham: Ofwat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat (1992) MD76 Guidelines on Debt and Disconnection (Birmingham: Ofwat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat (1991) Paying for Water the Way Ahead (Birmingham: Ofwat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat (1990) Paying for Water. A Time for Decisions (Birmingham: Ofwat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell, E.C. and D.J. Parker (1983) ‘The Changing Economic and Politi-cal Character of Water Planning in Britain’, Progress in Resource Management and Environmental Planning 4, 169–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Save the Children (1996) Water Tight: The Impact of Water Metering on Low-Income Families (London: Save the Children).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawkins, J.W. and V.A. Dickie (2006) Social Policies and Private Sector Participation in Water Supply: The Case of Great Britain. Programme on Markets, Business and Regulation (Geneva: UNRISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawkins, J.W. and V.A. Dickie (2005) ‘Affordability of Household Water and Sewerage Services in Great Britain’, Fiscal Studies 26(2), 225–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Executive (2005) The Principles to be Applied in Charging for Public Water and Sewerage Services in Scotland 2006–2010 (Edinburgh: Scottish Executive).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Executive (2001) Dwellings Connected to Public Water Mains and Public Sewers (Edinburgh: Scottish Executive).

    Google Scholar 

  • Synnott, M.F. (1985) The Relationship between the Regional Water Authorities and Local Planning Authorities. Unpublished doctoral thesis (London: Department of Geography, University of London, London School of Economics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veit-Wilson, J. (2004) Memorandum Submitted to House of Commons Select Committee on Work and Pensions (London: TSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veit-Wilson, J. (1998) Setting Adequacy Standards: How Governments Define Minimum Incomes (Bristol: Policy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J. and G. Yarrow (1988) Privatization: An Economic Analysis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Authorities Association (1988a) Waterfacts’88 (London: Water Authorities Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Authorities Association (1988b) National Performance Ratios and Statistics 1983/84 to 1987/88 (London: Water Authorities Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Companies’Association (1989) Water Companies: The Facts, the Figures, 1989 Edition (London: Water Companies’ Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Customer Consultation Panels (WCCP) (2003a) Affordability of Scottish Household Water and Sewerage Charges (Stirling: WCCP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Customer Consultation Panels (WCCP) (2003b) Affordability of Scottish Household Water and Sewerage Charges: Supplementary Report (Stirling: WCCP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Services Association (1989) Waterfacts’89 (London: Water Services Association).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 UNRISD

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sawkins, J.W., Dickie, V.A. (2008). Great Britain: England and Wales, and Scotland. In: Prasad, N. (eds) Social Policies and Private Sector Participation in Water Supply. Social Policy in a Development Context. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582880_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics