Integrating Homeless Young People into Housing and Employment

  • Mark Considine
  • Aaron Hart


This chapter studies five dimensions of a partnership case study: mandate, structure, resources, activities and dynamics. In considering the case and its dimensions, we will identify themes and issues relevant to the further development of governance theory for partnership initiatives and consider the transformative potential of network governance structures.


Homeless People Labour Market Policy Mutual Obligation Employment Assistance Partner Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arthur, W.B. (1989) ‘Competing Technologies and Lock-in by Historical Events’, Economic Journal, 99, March, 116–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthur, W.B. (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2003) ‘Demand for SAAP Assistance by Homeless People 2001–2002: A Report from the SAAP National Data Collection’, Canberra.Google Scholar
  4. Balloch, Susan and Marilyn Taylor (2001) ‘Conclusion: Can Partnership Work?’ in Balloch and Taylor (eds), Partnership Working: Policy and Practice, Bristol, The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benington, John and Mike Geddes (2001) ‘Introduction: Social Exclusion, Partnership and Local Governance – New Problems, New Policy Discourses in the European Union’, in Geddes, Mike and John Benington (eds), Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bordieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradford, N. (2003) ‘Public-Private Partnership? Shifting Paradigms of Economic Governance in Ontario’, in Canadian Journal of Political Science Dec 2003, 36 (5), 1005–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, S. and Horn M. (2003) Foundation Paper: A New Approach to Assisting Young Homeless Jobseekers, Melbourne, Hanover Welfare Services.Google Scholar
  9. Coles, B. (2000) Joined-up Research, Policy and Practice: A New Agenda for Change? Leicester, Youth Work Press.Google Scholar
  10. Commission on Public Private Partnerships (2001) ‘Final Report — Building Better Partnerships’, London, Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  11. Considine, M. (2001) Enterprising States: The Public Management of Welfare to Work, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Considine, M. (2002) ‘The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships and Joined-Up Services’, Governance, 15 (1), January, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crouch, C. and Henry F. (2002) Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism, European University Institute, Working Paper, SPS 2002/4.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions (2002) Collaboration and Coordination in Area-based Initiatives, DTLR, London.Google Scholar
  15. Geddes, M. (2001) ‘Local Partnerships and social exclusion in the United Kingdom — a stake in the market?’ in Geddes, Mike and Benington (eds), Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union – New Forms of Social Governance? London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Giguère, S. (2003) ‘Managing Decentralisation and New Forms of Governance’, in OECD, Managing Decentralisation: A New Role for Labour Market Policy, Paris, pp. 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodin, R.E. (ed.) (1996) The Theory of Institutional Design, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Grace, M. (2006) ‘A Social Experiment in Joining-up Services: Evaluating Outcomes of the YP4 Trial’, 2006 National Homelessness Conference, Sydney.Google Scholar
  19. Home Office (2001) Report of the Independent Review Team: Building Cohesive Communities, London.Google Scholar
  20. Horn, M. (1998a) Improving the Job Network for People in Housing Crisis, Melbourne, Hanover Welfare Services.Google Scholar
  21. Horn, M. (1998b) A Foot in the Door, Expectations for the Future of Homeless Young Adults, Melbourne, Hanover Welfare Services.Google Scholar
  22. Horn, M. (2004) A New Approach to Assisting Young Homeless Jobseekers: Trial Proposal, Melbourne, Hanover Welfare Services.Google Scholar
  23. Huxham, C. and S. Vangen (2003) ‘Nurturing Collaborative Relations: Building Trust in Interorganizational Collaboration’, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39 (1), March, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kickert, W. (1995) ‘Steering at a Distance: A New Paradigm of Public Governance in Dutch Higher Education’, Governance, 8 (1), 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klijn, E. (1993) ‘Regels in beleidsnetwerken: de institutionele context van beleid’, Quoted in W.J.M. Kickert et al. (eds), Managing Complex Networks, London, Sage Publications, p. 103.Google Scholar
  26. Koka, Balaji, R. and J. Prescott (2002) ‘Strategic Alliances as Social Capital: A Multidimensional View’, Strategic Management Journal, 23, May, 795–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin, N. (2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Linder, Stephen, H. and P. Vaillancourt Rosenau (2000) ‘Mapping the Terrain of the Public-Private Policy Partnership’, in Rosenau (ed.), Public-Private Policy Partnerships, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. McCarthy, D. (1998) ‘The Genesis and Evolution of the Irish State’s Commitment to Social Partnership at the Local Level’, in Kirby, P. and D. Jacobsen (eds), In the Shadow of the Tiger: New Approaches to Combating Social Exclusion, Dublin, DCU Press.Google Scholar
  30. North, D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Changes and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. North, Douglass C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. OECD (1993) Partnerships: the Key to Job Creation, Experiences from OECD Countries, Paris, OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  33. OECD (2001a) The Well-being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital, Paris, OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  34. OECD (2001b) Local Partnerships for Better Governance, Paris, OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  35. OECD (2003) Managing Decentralisation: A New Role for Labour Market Policy, Paris, OECD Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Meara, M. (1996) ‘Out of Work: Employment and Homelessness in the 1990s’, Melbourne, Report of the Inter-Agency Project on Homelessness.Google Scholar
  37. Pierson, P. (2000) ‘Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics’, American Political Science Review, 94 (2), 803–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rhodes, M. (2001) ‘The Political Economy of Social Pacts: “Competitive Corporatism” and European Welfare Reforms’, in Pierson, Paul (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.165–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996) ‘The New Governance: Governing without Government’, Political Studies Association, 44 (4), 652–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rhodes, R.A.W, and D. Marsh (1992) ‘Policy Networks in British Politics: A Critique of Existing Approaches’, in Rhodes and Marsh (eds), Policy Networks in British Government, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  41. Scharpf, F.W. (1994) ‘Games Real Actors Could Play — Positive and Negative Coordination in Embedded Negotiations’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (1), 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sorensen, E. and J. Torfing (2005) ‘The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 28 (3), 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stewart, M. (2003) ‘Tackling the Challenge of Policy Integration’, in OECD, 2003, Managing Decentralisation: A New Role for Labour Market Policy, Paris, OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  44. Stiglitz, J.E. and S.J. Wallsten (2000) ‘Public-Private technology Partnerships: Promises and Pitfalls’, in Vaillancourt Rosenau, Pauline (ed.), Public-Private Policy Partnerships, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar
  45. Sullivan, H. and C. Skelcher (2002) Working across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Uhr, R. (2003) Couch Surfing in the Burbs: Young Hidden & Homeless (Revised Edition), Brisbane, Community Connections.Google Scholar
  47. Urquhart, R., Matheson, G. and J. O’Brien (2002) Young Homeless People’s Experience of the Youth Allowance System, Paramatta NSW, UnitingCare Burnside.Google Scholar
  48. Walsh, J. (2001) ‘Catalysts for Change: Public Policy Reform through Local Partnerships in Ireland’, in Geddes and Benington (eds), Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Walsh, K. (1995) Public Services and Market Mechanisms. Competition, Contracting and the New Public Management, Houndsmills, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilkins, P. (2002) ‘Accountability and Joined-up Government’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61 (1), March, 114–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Woolcock, M. (2001) ‘The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes’, ISUMA, Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2 (1), Spring, 11–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mark Considine and Aaron Hart 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Considine
  • Aaron Hart

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations