The Power of Partnership: States and Solidarities in the Global Era

  • Mark Considine


We live in an age of profound transformations. Global economic pressures, the digital revolution and major shifts in family structure show us that contemporary Western societies are significantly different to those of previous generations. The sociologists tell us that this shift in traditional attachments is matched by a new drive for personal identity:

…the social order of the national state, class, ethnicity and the traditional family is in decline. The ethic of individual self-fulfilment and achievement is the most powerful current in modern society.

(Beck, 2000: 165)


Social Capital Social Exclusion Path Dependence Labour Market Policy American Political Science Review 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arthur, W. Brian (1989) ‘Competing Technologies and Lock-in by Historical Events’, Economic Journal, 99, March, 116–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthur, W. Brian (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001) ‘Special Article – Manufacturing in the Twentieth Century’, Year Book Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2005) Labour Force, Australia, Detailed: Table 05. Employed Persons by State and Industry.Google Scholar
  5. Axelrod, Robert (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Balloch, Susan and Marilyn Taylor (2001) ‘Conclusion – Can Partnership Work?’ in Balloch and Taylor (eds), Partnership Working: Policy and Practice, Bristol, The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barnard, H. (2005) Playford Food Alliance, Final Report, January 2004 – June 2005, Health Promotion S.A., Department of Health, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  8. Bauman, Zygmunt (1989) Modernity and the Holocaust, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bauman, Z. (1993), Postmodern Ethics, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, Ulrich (2000) ‘Living Your Life in a Runaway World: Individualisation, Globalisation and Politics’, in Will Hutton and Anthony Giddens (eds), On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism, London, Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  11. Bendor, J. and D. Mukherjee (1987) ‘Institutional Structure and the Logic of Ongoing Collective Action’, American Political Science Review, 81, 129–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benington, John and Mike Geddes (2001) ‘Introduction: Social Exclusion, Partnership and Local Governance – New Problems, New Policy Discourses in the European Union’, in Geddes, Mike and John Benington (eds), Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Benson, J. Kenneth (1975) ‘The Interorganisational Network as a Political Economy’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 20 (2), 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bradford, Neil (2003) ‘Public-Private Partnership? Shifting Paradigms of Economic Governance in Ontario’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36 (5), 1005–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charles, D. and P. Benneworth (2001) ‘Clustering and Economic Complexity: Regional ICT Clusters in the United Kingdom’, in OECD, Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems, Paris.Google Scholar
  16. Coase, R. H. (1960) ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coles, B. (2000) Joined-up Research, Policy and Practice: A New Agenda for Change? Leicester, Youth Work Press.Google Scholar
  18. Commission on Public Private Partnerships (2001) ‘Final Report — Building Better Partnerships’, Institute for Public Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
  19. Considine Mark (2001) Enterprising States: The Public Management of Welfare to Work, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Considine, Mark (2002) ‘The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships and Joined-Up Services’, Governance, 15 (1), January, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crouch, Colin and Henry Farrell (2002) ‘Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism’, European University Institute, Working Paper, SPS 2002/4.Google Scholar
  22. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions (2002) ‘Collaboration and Coordination in Area-based Initiatives’, DTLR, London.Google Scholar
  23. Ebbinghaus, B. and P. Manow (eds) (2001) Comparing Welfare Capitalism Social Policy and Political Economy in Europe, Japan and the USA, London, New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Elster, John, (1983) Explaining Technical Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Elster, John (1989) Solomonic Judgements, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Esping-Andersen, Gosta (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. European Commission (2001) ‘Peer Review, Territorial Pacts in Austria: Joint Use of Opportunities’, Vienna, May 10–11, DG EMPL.Google Scholar
  28. Feigenbaum, Harvey (1995) ‘Review of Robert Putnam, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy’, Governance, 8 (3), 436–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Forschner, Michael (2001) ‘Territorial Employment Pacts in Austria: Mainstreaming and Devolution’, Discussion Paper, in EU (2001), Vienna.Google Scholar
  30. Geddes, Mike (2001) ‘Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the United Kingdom — a Stake in the Market?’ in Geddes, M. and J. Benington (eds), Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union – New Forms of Social Governance? London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Genoff, R. and C. Atkinson (2002) ‘Addressing Environmental, Economic and Social Regeneration in the Northern Adelaide Region’, Sustaining our Communities Conference, Adelaide, The Regional Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Giguère, Sylvain (2003) ‘Managing Decentralisation and New Forms of Governance’, in OECD, Managing Decentralisation: A New Role for Labour Market Policy, Paris, pp. 11–26.Google Scholar
  33. Goodin, R.E. (ed.) (1996) The Theory of Institutional Design, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Granovetter, Mark, (1985) ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91 (November), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guger, Alios (1998) ‘Economic Policy and Social Democracy: The Austrian Experience’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14 (1), 40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hardin, Garrett (1968) ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, 162, 1243–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hess, Michael and David Adams (2005) ‘Localisation in Contemporary Public Management’ in Paul Smyth, Tim Reddel and Andrew Jones (eds), Community and Local Governance in Australia, Sydney, University of NSW Press.Google Scholar
  38. Home Office (2001) ‘Report of the Independent Review Team: Building Cohesive Communities’, London.Google Scholar
  39. Hopkins, N. (2004) The ‘New North’ Awakens, Australian Financial Review, 15 July.Google Scholar
  40. Huber, Evelyne and John D. Stephens (2001) ‘Welfare State and Production Regimes in the Era of Retrenchment’ in Paul Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 107–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Katzenstein, Peter J. (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kickert, W. (1995) ‘Steering at a Distance: A New Paradigm of Public Governance in Dutch Higher Education’, Governance, 8 (1), 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Klijn, Erik-Hans (1997) ‘Regels in beleidsnetwerken: de institutionele context van beleid’, Quoted in W. J. M Kickert et al. (eds), Managing Complex Networks, London, Sage, p. 103.Google Scholar
  44. Koka, Balaji, R. and John E. Prescott (2002) ‘Strategic Alliances as Social Capital: A Multidimensional View’, Strategic Management Journal, 23, May, 795–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kooiman, J. (2003) Governing as Governance, London, Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Krasner, Stephen D. (1983) ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’ in Krasner (ed.), International Regimes, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lasch, Christopher (1995) Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy, New York, W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  48. Lijphart, Arend (1968) The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lin, Nan (2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Linder, Stephen H. and Pauline Vaillancourt Rosenau (2000) ‘Mapping the Terrain of the Public-Private Policy Partnership’ in Rosenau (ed.), Public–Private Policy Partnerships, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lipset, S. M and S. Rokkan (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments, New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lubell, Mark (2004) ‘Collaborative Institutions: All Talk and No Action?’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23 (3), Summer, 549–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ludwig-Mayerhoffer, Wolfgang and Angela Wroblewski (2004), ‘Eppur si Muove? Activation Policies in Austria and Germany’, European Societies, 6 (4), 485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McCarthy, D. (1998) ‘The Genesis and Evolution of the Irish State’s Commitment to Social Partnership at the Local Level’, in Kirby, P. and D. Jacobsen (eds), In the Shadow of the Tiger: New Approaches to Combating Social Exclusion, Dublin, DCU Press.Google Scholar
  55. North, Douglass (1990) Institutions, Institutional Changes and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. North, Douglass (1993) ‘Economic Performance Through Time’, Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel, 9th December, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  57. OECD (1993) Partnerships: The Key to Job Creation, Experiences from OECD Countries, Paris, OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  58. OECD (2001a) The Well-being of Nations: the Role of Human and Social Capital, Paris, OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  59. OECD (2001b) Local Partnerships for Better Governance, Paris, OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  60. OECD (2003a) Managing Decentralisation: A New Role for Labour Market Policy, Paris, OECD Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. OECD (2003b) Economic Survey – Austria, ‘Issues in Fostering Labour Force Participation and Employment’, Paris.Google Scholar
  62. Offe, Claus (1991) ‘Review: The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism’, American Journal of Sociology, 96 (6), 1555–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Olson, Mancur (1965) The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler (1992) Re-inventing Government, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  65. Ostrom, Elinor (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ostrom, Elinor (1992) ‘Policy Analysis of Collective Action and Self-Governance’, in William N. Dunn and Rita Mae Kelly (eds), Advances in Policy Studies Since 1950, 81–119. Policy Studies Review Annual, vol. 10. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  67. Pichelmann, Karl and Helmut Hofer (1999) ‘Country Employment Policy Reviews: Austria’, Report Symposium on Social Dialogue and Employment Success, 2–3 March, Geneva, ILO.Google Scholar
  68. Pierson, Paul and Theda Skocpol (2002) ‘Historical Institutionalism and Contemporary Political science’, in Helen Milner and Ira Katznelson (eds), The State of the Discipline, New York, W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  69. Pierson, Paul (2000) ‘Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics’, American Political Science Review, 94 (2), 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pierson, Paul (ed.) (2001) The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Pierson, Paul (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  73. Rhodes, Martin (2001) ‘The Political Economy of Social Pacts: Competitive Corporatism and European Welfare Reforms’, in Pierson, Paul (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 165–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rhodes, R. A. W. and D. Marsh (1992) ‘Policy Networks in British Politics: a Critique of Existing Approaches’, in Rhodes and Marsh (eds), Policy Networks in British Government, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  75. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996) ‘The New Governance: Governing without Government’, Political Studies Association, 44 (4), 652–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sandeman, P. (2002) ‘The Playford Partnership — Community Capacity Building in Action’, Impact: News Monthly of the Australian Council of Social Services, May 2002.Google Scholar
  77. Sarason, Seymour B., Charles F. Carroll, Kenneth Matson, Saul Cohen and Elisabeth Lorentz (1977), Human Services and Resource Networks: Rationale, Possibilities and Public Policy, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  78. Schneider, Mark, John Scholz, Mark Lubell, Denisa Mindruta and Matthew Edwardsen (2003) ‘Building Consensual Institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program’, American Journal of Political Science, 47 (1), January, 143–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Simon, Herbert (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  80. Sørensen, E. and J. Tørfing (2005) ‘The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 28 (3), 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stewart, Murray (2003) ‘Tackling the Challenge of Policy Integration’ in OECD, 2003a, Managing Decentralisation: A New Role for Labour Market Policy, Paris, OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  82. Stiglitz, Joseph E. and Scott J. Wallsten (2000) ‘Public-Private Technology Partnerships: Promises and Pitfalls’, in Vaillancourt Rosenau, Pauline (ed.), Public-Private Policy Partnerships, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar
  83. Stutchbury, M. (1984) ‘The Playford Legend and the Industrialisation of South Australia’, Australian Economic History Review, 1, March, 1–19.Google Scholar
  84. Sullivan, Helen and Chris Skelcher (2002) Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  85. Taylor, Michael (1982) Community, Anarchy and Liberty, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Taylor, Michael and S.G. Singleton (1993) ‘The communal resource: Transaction costs and the solution of collective action problems’, Political Science, 21, 195–215.Google Scholar
  87. Trainor, P. (2006) ‘Innovative Governance in a Metropolitan Context? The Case of the Office of the North’, State of Australian Cities Conference, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  88. Walsh, Jim (2001) ‘Catalysts for Change: Public Policy Reform through Local Partnerships in Ireland’, in Geddes, M. and J. Benington (eds), Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union – New Forms of Social Governance? London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Walsh, K. (1995) Public Services and Market Mechanisms. Competition, Contracting and the New Public Management, Houndsmills, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wilkins, P. (2002) ‘Accountability and Joined-up Government’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61 (1), March, 114–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Woolcock, Michael (2001) ‘The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes’, ISUMA, Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2 (1), Spring, 11–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mark Considine 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Considine

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations