Abstract
Writers from the Muslim world have shown greater interest in Milton, his poetry, and his views than he displayed in any aspect of Islam. In the only scholarly study of Milton and Islam to be published, John Milton and the Arab-Islamic Culture (1987), Professor Eid Abdallah Dahiyat has usefully catalogued the numerous and varied critical responses that Milton’s writings have provoked from Arab-Islamic writers, poets and scholars. Since 1886, at least, Arab critics and literary historians have made strenuous efforts to make Milton their own, arguing that Milton ‘drew on’ Abu al-Ala al-Ma’arri’s tenth-century prose tale, Risalatu-al-ghufran, or ‘Epistle of Forgiveness’ when composing Paradise Lost.1 Al-Ma’arri describes a journey to paradise, a place of sensuous beauty and bodily delights, sufficiently resembling Milton’s to have generated lively discussions about poetic universality and influence. In 1939 an Egyptian essayist, Ahmed Khaki, took a novel approach and declared that ‘Milton’s handling of the fair sex is paradoxical… The reason is that Milton was a sexual maniac restrained by religious and ethical standards.’2 Further, Milton’s Satan has continually fascinated and inspired Arab-Islamic writers and critics because he so closely resembles Iblis, the rebel angel and shape-shifter who regularly employs humankind to wage his war against God and Islam.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Eid Abdallah Dahiyat, John Milton and the Arab-Islamic Culture ( Amman: Shukayr and Akasheh, 1987 ), pp. 71–5.
Ahmed Khaki, ‘John Milton and His Poetry in Light of Recent Psychological Research,’ Ath-Thaqafah, (21 November, 1939), p. 17, cited by Dahiyat, Milton, p. 67.
Abbas Mahmud al-’Aqqad, Iblis (Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al ‘Arabi, 1969). See my ‘Milton, Islam and the Ottomans’, in Sharon Achinstein and Elizabeth Sauer, eds, Milton and Toleration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 284–98, for further discussion of the Qur’ānic Iblis in the contexts of Milton’s treatment of the double fall.
See Sir Muhammad Iqbal, Shikwa and Jawab-I-Shikwa. Complaint and Answer: Iqbal’s Dialogue with Allah, trans. Khushwant Singh ( Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1981 ).
Paul Stevens, ‘Milton and the New World: Custom, Relativism, and the Discipline of Shame,’ in Balachandra Rajan and Elizabeth Sauer, eds, Milton and the Imperial Vision (Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1999), pp. 90–111
this passage on p. 92 citing Milton, Animadversions, from Douglas Bush, et al. eds, The Complete Prose Works of John Milton, 8 vols (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1953–82), 1: 668. Contrast Bruce McLeod’s ‘The “Lordly eye”: Milton and the Strategic Geography of Empire,’ in the same volume, pp. 48–66, which treats Milton as an advocate of English imperialism.
Cited by Daniel J. Vitkus, ‘Turning Turk in Othello: The Conversion and Damnation of the Moor,’ Shakespeare Quarterly, 48 (Summer 1997), 145–76; this passage, p. 148.
See Daniel J. Vitkus, Turning Turk: English Theatre and the Multicultural Mediterranean, 1570–1630 (New York: Palgrave, 2003)
and Gerald MacLean, ‘On Turning Turk, or Trying to: National Identity in Robert Daborne’s A Christian Turn’d Turke’, Explorations in Renaissance Culture, 29: 2 (Winter 2003): 225–52.
Samuel Johnson, Lives of the English Poets, ed. George Birkbeck Hill, 3 vols (Oxford: Clarendon, 1905), 1: 157.
Joshua Poole, The English Parnassus: Or, A Helpe to English Poesie (1654), p. 213.
Samuel Chew, The Crescent and the Rose: Islam and England During the Renaissance (New York: Oxford University Press, 1937), pp. 149, 253.
Clifford Edmund Bosworth, ‘The Prophet Vindicated: A Restoration Treatise on Islam and Muhammad,’ Religion: A Journal of Religions and Religions, 6: 1 (Spring 1976): 1–12, these passages, pp. 1, 2.
On the contemporary controversy, see Gerald Maclean, ‘Before Orientalism? Islam, Ottomans, and Moors in the English Renaissance’, Review, 22 (2000): 229–47.
I have drawn this material from Laurence Sterne and Harold Kollmeier, eds, A Concordance to the English Prose of John Milton (Binghampton, NY: MRTS, 1985) and followed their citation system in subsequent references to Bush, et al. eds, Complete Prose, hereafter CP.
See Nabil Matar, Islam in Britain, 1558–1685 ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 ), pp. 153–5.
See Chew, Crescent, pp. 149, 253, and on Ibrahim Pasha’s campaign against Tahmasp, see Caroline Finkel, Osman’s Dream. The Story of the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1923 ( London: Murray, 2005 ), pp. 125–6.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Gerald MacLean
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
MacLean, G. (2008). Milton among the Muslims. In: Dimmock, M., Hadfield, A. (eds) The Religions of the Book. Early Modern Literature in History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582576_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582576_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28613-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58257-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)