Abstract
The domestic impact of the EU entails a mix of policy instruments emanating from ‘Brussels’. Some are ‘hard’ laws, such as EU directives or policy rules set by treaties. Others involve policy coordination with ‘soft’ instruments of sharing best practice and/or the Commission urging preferred solutions. Domestic actors must distinguish between these instruments to determine their constraints. They must also judge how ‘hard’ law instruments might be used by the Commission to promote domestic reforms drawn from ‘soft’ agendas. To politicians and the public, what ‘Europe’ expects in terms of domestic policy and practice can be a matter of some confusion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Kevin Featherstone and Dimitris Papadimitriou
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Featherstone, K., Papadimitriou, D. (2008). Destination Nowhere: Restructuring Olympic Airways/Airlines. In: The Limits of Europeanization. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582378_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582378_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28295-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58237-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)