Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Performance Interventions ((PIPI))

  • 194 Accesses

Abstract

The re-emergence of issue plays in Britain since 1998, and acceleration of the trend from the year 2000, unequivocally signals theatre’s return to engagement with politics. This fresh engagement may be seen as the bursting of a dam after years of mounting dissent and frustration. Alternatively, the renewed engagement with politics may be seen as the outcome of several years of more accessible and responsive government, along with increased confidence in the possibility of political action on issues of urgent concern. Plays about specific political issues arise from a strongly felt need for change that impels proponents of such change to attempt to defy the odds against success as they bring their case before the public. Anger and even desperation propels such plays. However, an issue-oriented play also relies on some level of confidence that the political system will attend to the message and has the capacity to change. The systematic and thorough control exercised during the Thatcher years denied a hearing to issues of concern to the opposition. Under these conditions, anger turned to frustration, despair, and disengagement from public affairs. Recovery from these conditions did not occur overnight. Neither the in-yer-face plays nor the responses to them articulated specific issues that could conceivably be addressed by the government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Norton-Taylor had previously collaborated with John McGrath on Half the Picture in 1994, about hearings into arms deals with Iraq, and written Nuremberg in 1996, to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of the Nazi war crimes tribunal.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Norton-Taylor, Richard, ‘How Hutton Became a Play’, Guardian 4 November 2003, online edition.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Norton-Taylor, Richard, ‘Bloody Sunday: The Final Reckoning Begins’, Guardian 22 November 2004, online edition.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David Hare noted, in an interview with New York Times reporter Elisabeth Bumiller, that his own admiration for Powell led him to portray him as something of a hero, but that he ‘toughened up the writing about Powell’ in response to knowledgeable critics who considered this too positive a view (New York Times 3 April 2006: A 14).

    Google Scholar 

  5. After the New York opening of the play, Colin Powell began to speak out about the prelude to war in Iraq, claiming that he knew there were no WMD and laying responsibility for the threats regarding such weapons on Vice President Cheney and the CIA. See Robert Scheer, ‘Now Powell Tells Us’, The Nation 26 April 2006, web edition.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Amelia Howe Kritzer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kritzer, A.H. (2008). Issues for Post-Thatcher Britain. In: Political Theatre in Post-Thatcher Britain. Performance Interventions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582224_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics