Abstract
Events since 11 September 2001 have encouraged renewed debate on a dimension of diplomacy that, in varying forms, has a considerable pedigree. But, as with earlier debates concerning what is ‘old’ and ‘new’ in the practice of diplomacy, there is a danger here in failing to set the key issues within the framework of broader changes in world politics. More precisely, in the context of the theme of this book, current preoccupations with implementing public diplomacy strategies and developing new mechanisms within foreign ministries for overseeing them lead to the danger of misunderstanding the significance of public diplomacy and confusing its role as a mode of exercising power with the changing environments in which power is projected.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
H. Nicolson, The Evolution of Diplomatic Method (London: Thornton Butterworth, 1939), p. 90.
K. Hamilton and R. Langhorne, The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 124–7.
D. Carlson and D. Comstock, Citizen Summitry: Keeping the Peace when it Matters Too Much to be Left to Politicians (Los Angeles CA: Tarcher, 1986), p. 13.
E. Potter (ed.), Cyber-Diplomacy: Managing Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002).
See, for example, R. A. O’Brien, M. Goetz, J. A. Scholte and M. Williams, Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
J. Hertz, ‘Political Realism Revisited’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2, June 1981, pp. 182–97.
M. Leonard, Public Diplomacy (London: Foreign Policy Centre, 2002), p. 9.
P. van Ham, ‘Branding Territory: Inside the Wonderful Worlds of PR and IR Theory’, Millennium, vol. 31, no. 2, 2002, pp. 249–69.
R. Rosecrance, The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modem World (New York: Basic Books, 1986).
P. Cerny, ‘Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization’ Government and Opposition, spring 1997, pp. 251–74.
W. Olins, Trading Identities: Why Countries and Companies are Taking On Each Other’s Roles (London: Foreign Policy Centre, 1999), pp. 1–3.
Finnish Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Challenges for the Finnish Foreign Service in the Twenty-First Century (Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs, 2001), pp. 6 and 21.
M. Bruter, ‘Diplomacy without a State: The External Delegations of the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 6, no. 2, 1999, pp. 183–205.
See J. Nye, Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power (New York: Basic Books, 1990); and
J. Nye, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: Perseus, 2004).
W. R. Mead, ‘America’s Sticky Power’, Foreign Policy, March/April 2004, p. 48.
Comment made by Waring Partridge, in D. Bollier, The Rise of Netpolitik: How the Internet is Changing International Politics and Diplomacy, a report of the eleventh annual Aspen Institute round table on Information Technology (Washington DC: Aspen Institute, 2003), p. 17.
C. Grimes, ‘US Universities Failed by Visa Process’, Financial Times, 12 May 2004.
J. C. Cooper, ‘China has Discovered its Own Economic Consensus’, Financial Times, 8 May 2004.
R. McGregor, ‘China’s Success Inspires Envy and Awe’, Financial Times, 28 May 2004.
N. Ferguson, ‘Power’, Foreign Policy, January/February, 2003, p. 21.
J. Nye, ‘America’s Power: The New Rome Meets the New Barbarians’, The Economist, 23 March 2002, p. 24;
J. Nye, The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
K. Reinhard and T. Miller, ‘A Business Problem’, International Herald Tribune, 27 May 2004.
J. Manheim, Strategic Public Diplomacy and American Foreign Policy: The Evolution of Influence (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).
M. Leonard and V. Alakeson, Going Public: Diplomacy for the Information Society (London: Foreign Policy Centre, 2000), pp. 86–98.
M. Woollacott, ‘“Soft Power” Can Win the Battle for Hearts and Minds’, The Guardian, 2 August 2002.
Council on Foreign Relations, Finding America’s Voice: A Strategy for Reinvigorating US Public Diplomacy, report of an independent Task Force (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2003).
C. Hill, The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), p. 279.
D. Stone, Networks, Second-Track Diplomacy and Regional Cooperation: The Role of Southeast Asian Think Tanks, paper presented to the 38th International Studies Convention, Toronto, March 1997.
W. Reinecke, Global Public Policy: Governing without Government? (Washington DC: Brookings, 1998);
W. Reinecke, ‘The Other World Wide Web: Global Public Policy Networks’, Foreign Policy, vol. 117, 2000, pp. 44–57.
In a recent book, Anne-Marie Slaughter argues the case for a network approach to diplomacy but does so in the context of exclusively governmental networks. See A-M. Slaughter, A New World Order (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).
B. Hocking, ‘Catalytic Diplomacy: Beyond “Newness” and “Decline”’, in J. Melissen (ed.), Innovation in Diplomatic Practice (London: Macmillan, 1999), pp. 21–42.
C. Bob, ‘Merchants of Morality’, Foreign Policy, March/April 2002, pp. 36–45.
Many diplomats have noted how the ‘outreach’ function has dramatically expanded. See, for example, K. Rana, Inside Diplomacy (New Delhi: Manas Publications, 2000).
R. Cohen, ‘Reflections on the New Global Diplomacy’, in J. Melissen (ed.), Innovation in Diplomatic Practice (Houndmills: Macmillan, 1999), p. 16.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Brian Hocking
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hocking, B. (2005). Rethinking the ‘New’ Public Diplomacy. In: Melissen, J. (eds) The New Public Diplomacy. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-53554-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-55493-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)