The Causal Nexus between Foreign Investment and Economic Growth in India
The superiority of multinational corporations (MNCs) over local firms. Output per worker in MNCs taken as a group is often many times greater than in local owned operation. Wages paid by foreign affiliates are also higher than local owned operations in both developed and developing host countries, within the same industries and the same locations.
A shift towards greater use of non-equity and cooperative relationships with other enterprises such as alliances, partnership, management contracts or subcontracting arrangements serve corporate objectives. They can provide better access to technologies or other assets, allowing firms to share the cost and risk of innovatory activities and can reduce the production cost of labour-incentive products.
Emergence of a network type of organisation expands the scope of interactions between MNCs and enterprises from host countries which will create international economic integration.
MNCs create an integrated international product system through FDI. This will broaden the range of resources sought by MNCs in host countries, making firms more selective in their choices. This can also encourage FDI in countries that cannot provide a wide range of resources but have some specific advantage (accounting, technology, products, etc.).
KeywordsForeign Direct Investment Gross Domestic Product Host Country Foreign Investment Intellectual Property Right
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- —— Lipsey, R.E. and Zejan, M. ‘What Explains the Growth of Developing Countries?’, in W.J. Baumol, R.R. Nelson and E.N. Wolff (eds), Convergence of Productivity: Cross-National Studies, and Historical Evidence, New York, Oxford University Press, 1994, 243–59.Google Scholar
- Cable, V. and Persaud, B., New Trends and Policy Problems in Foreign Investment: The Experience of Commonwealth Countries’, in V. Cable and B. Persaud (eds), Developing with Foreign Investment, London, Croom Helm, 1987.Google Scholar
- De Mello, L.R., ‘Foreign Direct Investment-Led Growth: Evidence from Time Series and Panal Data’, Department of Economics, University of Kent at Cantebury 1996.Google Scholar
- Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A., ‘Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with Unit Root’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 1979, 427–31.Google Scholar
- Dunning, J.H., Studies in Direct Investment, London, Allen & Unwin, 1970.Google Scholar
- —— Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Wokingham, Addison-Wesley 1992.Google Scholar
- Graham, E.M. and Krugman, P.R., Foreign Direct Investment in the United States, Washington, DC, Institute for International Economics, 1989.Google Scholar
- Gujarati, D., Basic Econometrics. 3rd edn, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1995.Google Scholar
- Karikari, J.A., ‘Causality between Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Output in Ghana’, Journal of Economic Development, 17, 1992, 7–17.Google Scholar
- Kasibhatla, K. and Sawhney B., ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in the US: Evidence from Co-Integration and Granger Causality Tests’, Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Comerciali, 43(2), 1996, 411–20.Google Scholar
- Levine, R. and Renelt, D., ‘A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions’, American Economic Review, 82(4), 1992, 942–63.Google Scholar
- Lipsey E.R., ‘Inward Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Developing Countries’, Transnational Corporations, 9(1), 2000.Google Scholar
- Lubitz, R. ‘United States Direct Investment in Canada and Canadian Capital Formation, 1950–1962’, PhD dissertation, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University, 1966.Google Scholar
- O’Sullivan, P. and Geyikdagi, Y., ‘Japanese Direct Investment in the United States’, Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali, 9(41), 1994, 761–73.Google Scholar
- Rugman, A. (ed), Foreign Investment and NAFTA, Columbia, SC, University of South Carolina Press, 1994.Google Scholar
- Saltz, I.S., ‘The Negative Correlation between Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in the Third World: Theory and Evidence’, Rivista Internationale di Scienze Economiche e Commmerciali, 7(39), 1992, 617–33.Google Scholar
- Scaperlanda, A.E. and Mauer, L.J., ‘The Determinants of US Direct Investment in the EEC’, American Economic Review, 59, 1969, 558–68.Google Scholar
- Shah, J., Tian, G. and Sen, F., ‘The FDI-Led Growth Hypothesis: Further Econometric Evidence from China’, Economics Decision Working Paper, China Economy, 1997.Google Scholar
- Tsai, P.L., ‘Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment and its Impact on Economic Growth’, Journal of Economic Development, 19(1), 1994, 137–63.Google Scholar
- United Nations, Foreign Investment and Trade Linkages in Developing Countries, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
- Verno, R., Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of OS Enterprises, New York, Basic Books, 1971.Google Scholar
- Zapata, H.O. and Rambaldi, A.N., ‘Monte Carlo Evidence on Cointegration and Causation’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 59, 1997.Google Scholar