Advertisement

‘Gothic gnomes’: Degenerate Fictions

  • Julia Reid
Chapter
  • 44 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture book series (PNWC)

Abstract

Stevenson’s ’gothic gnomes’ bring alive the same late-Victorian anxieties about degeneracy which haunt his autobiographical writings.1 They incite, and depend upon, reactions of pleasurable fear and horror — reactions which embody the supposed degeneracy of popular literature, and point to the way that external environment and cultural habit could trigger degeneration. They also, most importantly, tell tales of atavism, figuring the resurgence of irrational states of mind. Fin-de-siècle fiction, as Robert Mighall argues, took up an earlier Gothic interest in the power of the past to haunt the present, and invested it with a newly evolutionist accent.2 Thus these irrational resurgences were understood as the irruption of the primitive in civilized modern life. Stevenson’s tales of horror are populated by characters whose mental disorders push them towards savage bestial conditions, insanity, or even death, but they also question biological notions of primitive resurgences. This chapter investigates how the interest in the psychological ‘borderlands’ of degeneracy evident in Stevenson’s letters, and his preoccupation with questions about heredity, will, and environment, finds fictional form in his neo-Gothic tales, ‘The Merry Men’ (1882), ‘Olalla’ (1885), ‘Markheim’ (1885), and Dr. Jekγll and Mr. Hyde (1886).

Keywords

Popular Literature Contagious Nature Autobiographical Writing British Audience Psychological Drive 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Robert Mighall, A Geography of Victorian Gothic Fiction: Mapping History’s Nightmares (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), xviii–xxiii.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Stevenson, ‘The Merry Men’ (1882), in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, The Merry Men, and Other Tales (London: J. M. Dent, 1925), 63–106, 65. Subsequent page references appear in the text.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Ed Block, ‘James Sully, Evolutionist Psychology, and Late Victorian Gothic Fiction’, Victorian Studies 25 (1982), 443–67, 458.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Stevenson, Travels with a Donkey in the Cévennes (1879), in Travels with a Donkey in the Cévennes and Selected Travel Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), 121–231, 209.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    Edwin M. Eigner, Robert Louis Stevenson and Romantic Tradition (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1966), 142.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    E. B. Tylor, Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom, 2 vols (London: John Murray, 1871), 1: 258.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    James Sully, ‘Poetic Imagination and Primitive Conception’, Comhill Magazine 34 (1876), 294–306, 296–8; Illusions: A Psychological Study (London: Kegan Paul, 1881), 224–7.Google Scholar
  8. 13.
    Stevenson, ‘The Merry Men’, Comhill Magazine 46.1 (July 1882), 56–73, 62.Google Scholar
  9. 15.
    J. R. Moore, ‘Stevenson’s Source for “The Merry Men”’, Philological Quarterly 23 (1944), 135–40, 140.Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    Honor Mulholland, ‘Robert Louis Stevenson and the Romance Form’, in Andrew Noble, ed., Robert Louis Stevenson (London: Vision Press, 1983), 96–117, 109, 111.Google Scholar
  11. 17.
    Stevenson, ‘The Merry Men’, Comhill Magazine, 46.1 (July 1882), 71.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    Tom Shearer, ‘A Strange Judgement of God’s? Stevenson’s The Merry Men’, Studies in Scottish Literature 20 (1985), 71–85, 74, 78.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    Nicholas Phillipson, ‘Providence and Progress: an Introduction to the Historical Thought of William Robertson’, in Stewart J. Brown, ed., William Robertson and the Expansion of Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 55–73.Google Scholar
  14. 26.
    Ed Block, Rituals of Dis-integration: Romance and Madness in the Victorian Psychomythic Tale (New York: Garland, 1993), 150.Google Scholar
  15. Claire Harman, Robert Louis Stevenson: a Biography (London: HarperCollins, 2005), 308.Google Scholar
  16. 28.
    Stevenson, ‘Et Tu in Arcadia Vixisti’, in Underwoods (1887), rpr. in Collected Poems, ed. Janet Adam Smith (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1950), 109–77,125.Google Scholar
  17. 29.
    Arthur Machen, The Great God Pan (1894; Salem, New Hampshire: Ayer, 1970).Google Scholar
  18. Vernon Lee (pseud, of Violet Paget), ‘Marsyas in Flanders’ (1900), in For Maurice: Five Unlikely Stories (London: Bodley Head, 1927), 71–92.Google Scholar
  19. Walter Pater, ‘Apollo in Picardy’ (1893), in Miscellaneous Studies (1895; London: Macmillan, 1910), 142–71.Google Scholar
  20. 30.
    J. G. Millingen, Mind and Matter: Illustrated by Considerations on Hereditary Insanity, and the Influence of Temperament in the Development of the Passions (London: H. Hurst, 1847), 157.Google Scholar
  21. Cited in Jenny Bourne Taylor and Sally Shuttleworth, eds, Embodied Selves: An Anthology of Psychological Texts 1830–1890 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 169.Google Scholar
  22. 35.
    Arthur Conan Doyle, The Hound of the Baskervilles (1901–2), ed. W. W. Robson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 139.Google Scholar
  23. Dorian recognizes himself in his ancestor Philip Herbert’s portrait: Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray (1890, revised 1891), in The Major Works, ed. Isobel Murray (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), 47–214, 154. See the discussion in Mighall, Geography, 159–63.Google Scholar
  24. 50.
    Joseph Egan, ‘“Markheim”: a Drama of Moral Psychology’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction 20 (1966), 377–84, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 53.
    Jenni Calder, RLS: a Life Study (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1980), 221.Google Scholar
  26. 54.
    Irving Saposnik, ‘Stevenson’s “Markheim”: a Fictional “Christmas Sermon”’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction 21 (1966), 277–82, 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 55.
    Forbes Winslow, On the Obscure Diseases of the Brain, and Disorders of the Mind (1860), 4th edn (London: John Churchill, 1868), 234, 299, 234.Google Scholar
  28. 56.
    See F. W. H. Myers, ‘Multiplex Personality’, Nineteenth Century 20 (1886), 648–66.Google Scholar
  29. 61.
    Richard Boyle and Patrick Brantlinger, ‘The Education of Edward Hyde: Stevenson’s “Gothic Gnome” and the Mass Readership of Late-Victorian England’, in Gordon Hirsch and William Veeder, eds, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde after One Hundred Years (London: University of Chicago Press, 1988), 265–82, 266.Google Scholar
  30. 62.
    Gavin Ogilvy, ‘Robert Louis Stevenson’, British Weekly, 2 November 1888, rpr. in Stevenson, Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1886), ed. Katherine Linehan (New York: W. W. Norton, 2003), 120.Google Scholar
  31. 73.
    Graham Balfour, The Life of Robert Louis Stevenson, 2 vols (London: Methuen, 1901), 2: 12.Google Scholar
  32. 74.
    Marie-Christine Leps, Apprehending the Criminal: the Production of Deviance in Nineteenth-Century Discourse (Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1992), 205–20.Google Scholar
  33. Mary Rosner, ‘“A Total Subversion of Character”: Dr Jekyll’s Moral Insanity’, Victorian Newsletter 93 (1998), 27–31.Google Scholar
  34. Stephen Heath, ‘Psychopathia Sexualis: Stevenson’s Strange Case’, in Lyn Pykett, ed., Reading Fin de Siècle Fictions (London: Longman, 1996), 64–79.Google Scholar
  35. Robert Mighall, ‘Diagnosing Jekyll: the Scientific Context of Dr Jekyll’s Experiment and Mr Hyde’s Embodiment’, in Stevenson, The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and Other Tales of Terror, ed. Robert Mighall (London: Penguin, 2002), 145–61.Google Scholar
  36. 75.
    Stephen D. Arata, ‘The Sedulous Ape: Atavism, Professionalism, and Stevenson’s Jekyll and Hyde’, Criticism: a Quarterly Journal for Literature and the Arts 37 (1995), 233–59; Mighall, Geography, 145–53, 187–95. For Daniel Pick too, Jekyll and Hyde, among other neo-Gothic novels, ‘implicitly interrogated the validity of any determinist methodology’: Daniel Pick, Faces ofGoogle Scholar
  37. 76.
    Maudsley, The Pathology of Mind: A Study of its Distempers, Deformities, and Disorders (London: Macmillan, 1895), 540.Google Scholar
  38. 79.
    Stevenson, ‘Pulvis et Umbra’ (1888), in Across the Plains: With Other Memories and Essays (London: Chatto and Windus, 1907), 289–301, 300.Google Scholar
  39. 81.
    John Herdman, The Double in Nineteenth-Century Fiction (Basingstoke: Macmillan, now Palgrave Macmillan, 1990), 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 84.
    Myers, ‘Personality’; Mighall, ‘Diagnosing’, 146–7; Karl Miller, Doubles: Studies in Literary History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985), 209–15.Google Scholar
  41. 85.
    Mrs R. L. Stevenson, ‘Note’, xviii; Roger G. Swearingen, The Prose Writings of Robert Louis Stevenson: a Guide (Hamden, Connecticut: Archon Books, 1980), 101. The paper was probably Myers’s ‘Multiplex Personality’, which appeared in November 1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 88.
    See Henry Maudsley, Responsibility in Mental Disease (London: H. S. King, 1874), passim.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 89.
    Smith Baker, ‘Etiological Significance of Heterogeneous Personality’, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 20 (1893), 664–74, 671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 91.
    For moral insanity, see for instance George H. Savage, ‘Moral Insanity’, Journal of Mental Science 27 (1881), 147–55.Google Scholar
  45. 94.
    Stevenson, New Arabian Nights (1878; London: Heinemann, 1923), 18.Google Scholar
  46. 95.
    Edwin Ray Lankester, Degeneration: A Chapter in Darwinism (London: Macmillan, 1880), 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 96.
    Stevenson, ‘The Day After Tomorrow’ (1887), in Ethical Studies, Edinburgh: Picturesque Notes (London: Heinemann et al., 1924), 113–23, 120. As Wells’s Time-Traveller says, ‘[s]trength is the outcome of need; security sets a premium on feebleness’: H. G. Wells, The Time Machine (1895), ed. John Lawton (London: J. M. Dent, 1995), 27.Google Scholar
  48. 101.
    Edward Charles Spitzka, ‘Cases of Masturbation (Masturbatic Insanity)’, Journal of Mental Science 34 (April 1888), 52–61, 53, 52. See Mighall’s discussion of this analogy in Geography, 192–5.Google Scholar
  49. 103.
    Elaine Showalter, Sexual Anarchy: Gender and Culture at the Fin de Siècle (London: Bloomsbury, 1991), 107.Google Scholar
  50. 118.
    Havelock Ellis, The Criminal (London: Walter Scott, 1890), 78–9; Hurley, Body, 101.Google Scholar
  51. For a discussion of women’s instinctive ability to sense danger, see Grant Allen, ‘Woman’s Intuition’, Forum (and Century) 9 (1890), 333–40.Google Scholar
  52. 120.
    For the increasing interest in suggestion and imitation, see Athena Vrettos, Somatic Fictions: Imagining Illness in Victorian Culture (Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1995), 84.Google Scholar
  53. 121.
    Sully, Illusions, 277; Daniel Hack Tuke, Illustrations of the Influence of the Mind Upon the Body in Health and Disease Designed to Elucidate the Action of the Imagination, 2nd edn, 2 vols (London: J. and A. Churchill, 1884), 1: 108–10.Google Scholar
  54. 122.
    Gustave Le Bon, The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind (London: Fisher Unwin, 1896), 31.Google Scholar
  55. 129.
    Donald Rumbelow, The Complete Jack the Ripper (London: W. H. Allen, 1979), 77.Google Scholar
  56. 130.
    J. A. Symonds to Stevenson, 3 March 1886, in The Letters of John Addington Symonds, ed. Herbert M. Schueller and Robert L. Peters, 3 vols (Detroit, Michigan: Wayne State University Press, 1968–69), 3: 121.Google Scholar
  57. 134.
    Oscar Wilde, ‘The Decay of Lying’ (1889), in The Artist as Critic: Critical Writings of Oscar Wilde, ed. Richard Ellmann (New York: Vintage, 1969), 290–320, 295.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Julia Reid 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Reid

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations