Advertisement

Philosophy’s Obligation to the Human Being in the Aftermath of Genocide

  • Paul C. Santilli

Abstract

When Philip Gourevitch walked among the dead Tutsis massacred by the Hutus at Nyarubuye in the Rwandan genocide of 1994, he saw, one year after the killings, that the dead were still there, left unburied as a memorial to what had happened. He noted that the corpses were strangely beautiful: “The randomness of the fallen forms, the strange tranquility of their rude exposure, the skull here, the arm bent in some uninterpretable gesture there—these things were beautiful, and their beauty only added to the affront of the place.”1 After stepping accidentally on a skull, hearing its crunch and feeling its vibration, Gourevitch was unsure of his response, worrying that he, like Leontius in Book IV of Plato’s Republic, was cursed for having his fill “of the lovely spectacle.” He felt unreal. Gourevitch confessed that the dead were to him omnipresent but only as “absences” and “only of interest as evidence” in the impending trials of their killers.2

Keywords

International Criminal Tribunal Death Camp Rwandan Genocide Fall Form Human Solidarity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Michael S. Roth and Charles G. Salas, eds, Disturbing Remains: Memory’ History’ and Crisis in the Twentieth Century (Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Research Institute, 2001), pp. 63–73.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    George Steiner, Language and Silence: Essays on Language, Literature, and the Inhuman (New York: Atheneum, 1967), p. 156.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    David Chandler, Voices from S-21: Terror and History in Pol Pot’s Secret Prison, (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999), pp. 111–12.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Adriaan T. Peperzak, Simon Critchley, and Robert Bernasconi, eds, Emmanuel Levinas: Basic Philosophical Writings (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1996), pp. 162–9.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Erna Paris, Long Shadows: Truth, Lies and History (New York and London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2001), pp. 417–18.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    William Schabas, Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Immanuel Kant, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, trans. George di Giovanni, in Allen Wood and George di Giovanni, eds, Immanuel Kant: Religion and Rational Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 96 (italics added).Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    David Patterson, “G-d, World, Humanity: Jewish Reflections on Justice after Auschwitz,” in David Patterson and John K. Roth, eds, After-Words: Post-Holocaust Struggles with Forgiveness, Reconciliation, Justice (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 2004), pp. 171–82, p. 173.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    Alain Badiou, Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil, trans. Peter Hallward (London: Verso, 2001).Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Alain Finkielkraut, In the Name of Humanity: Reflections on the Twentieth Century, trans. Judith Friedlander (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000), pp. 58–9.Google Scholar
  11. 20.
    Immanuel Levinas, Entre Nous: On Thinking of the Other, trans. Michael Smith and Barbara Harshav (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998), p. 94.Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    Hannah Arendt, On Revolution (London and New York: Viking-Penguin, 1963), p. 88.Google Scholar
  13. 23.
    Primo Levi, If This Is a Man, trans. Stuart Woolf (London: Sphere Books-Penguin, 1987), p. 96.Google Scholar
  14. 24.
    Giorgio Agamben, Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive (New York: Zone Books, 1999), p. 62.Google Scholar
  15. 28.
    Judy Ledgerwood, “The Cambodian Tuol Sleng Museum of Genocidal Crimes: National Narrative,” in David E. Lovey and William H. Beezley, eds, Genocide, Collective Violence, and Popular Memory: The Politics of Remembrance in the Twentieth Century (Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, Inc., 2002), pp. 103–22.Google Scholar
  16. 29.
    Jacob Meskin, “The Jewish Transformation of Modern Thought: Levinas and Philosophy After the Holocaust,” Cross Currents 47 (Winter 1997–98), p. 505.Google Scholar
  17. 30.
    Martha Minow, Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1998), p. 146.Google Scholar
  18. 31.
    Eva Hoffman, After Such Knowledge: Memory, History, and the Legacy of the Holocaust (New York: Public Affairs, 2004), pp. 160–1.Google Scholar
  19. 34.
    Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the Social (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998), p. 166.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul C. Santilli 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul C. Santilli

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations