Advertisement

Beyond the Affectations of Philosophy

  • James R. Watson

Abstract

When conversation provokes the look that says, “We do not talk about that,” one is well advised to remember that indirection succeeds better than frontal assaults. On the other hand, if one lacks the stomach for deceit in such situations, it is simply a matter of good taste to rehearse the customary denunciations and regrets, referencing either the regrettable aspects of human nature, the inhuman nature of the perpetrators, and/or the incomprehensibility of such matters. Insistence on pushing past these customary exculpatory fabulations will be met by the “we don’t talk about that” of all socially approved discourse. One learns, later more often than sooner, that decorum has its own insistence—leave sleeping dogs lie. How then to handle the knowledge that sleeping dogs and their medicated masters have quite a bit to do with the erosion of public discourse? Is it possible that high society, high culture, and higher education are all major players in the “end” of democracy?

Keywords

Moral Progress Mass Killing Human Equality Academic Capital Heavy Hitter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. John Cumming (New York: Seabury Press, 1972), p. 195.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Immanuel Kant, Perpetual Peace and Other Essays, trans. Ted Humphrey (Indianapolis IN: Hackett, 1983), p. 41.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Theodor W. Adorno, Metaphysics: Concept and Problems, trans. Edmund Jephcott (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000), p. 121.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Theodor W. Adorno, Negative Dialectics, trans. E. B. Ashton (New York: Seabury Press, 1973), p. 362.Google Scholar
  5. Ward Churchill, A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492 to the Present (San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books, 1997), pp. 85–8.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Henry L. Feingold, The Politics of Rescue: The Roosevelt Administration and the Holocaust, 1938–1945 (New York: Holocaust Library, 1970), p. 313.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Jean Baudrillard, The Transparency of Evil, trans. James Benedict (London: Verso, 1993), pp. 121–2.Google Scholar
  8. Alfred I. Tauber, The Immune Self: Theory or Metaphor? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 13.
    Albert Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays, trans. Justin O’Brien (New York: Vintage Books, 1991), p. 4.Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    Eva Fleischner, ed., Auschwitz: Beginning of a New Era? (New York: KTAV, 1977), pp. 45–8.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    Theodor W. Adorno, Critical Models, trans. Henry W. Pickford (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998), p. 45.Google Scholar
  12. 22.
    Ernest Bloch, The Principle of Hope, trans. Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice, and Paul Knight (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1986), Vol. 1, p. 283.Google Scholar
  13. 26.
    Michael Dobkowski and Isidor Wallimann, eds., The Coming Age of Scarcity: Preventing Mass Death and Genocide in the Twenty-first Century (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1998), p. ix.Google Scholar
  14. 32.
    Arthur I. Miller, Insights of Genius: Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996), p. 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 34.
    Albert Camus, L’homme révolté (Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1951), p. 341.Google Scholar
  16. 35.
    See Thomas F. Gossett, Race: The History of an Idea in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 416.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© James R. Watson 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • James R. Watson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations