Epistemic Conditions for Genocide

  • Emmanuel C. Eze

Abstract

This chapter assumes that there is a widely shared definition of genocide.1 What I explore are the deepest origins of that devastating crime. The claims I make about the relationships between philosophy and genocide—including the way in which I construe the idea of the philosophical—are likely to be more controversial than the usual definition of genocide, but I hope they will be persuasive nonetheless.

Keywords

Europe Defend Stake Univer Alan 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Colin Tatz, With Intent to Destroy: Reflecting on Genocide (London: Verso, 2003).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norman Cohn, Warrant for Genocide: The Myth of the Jewish World-Conspiracy and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (New York: Harper and Row, 1967), p. 263.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    See Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. John Cumming (New York: Continuum, 1999).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: Vintage, 1995).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Jürgen Habermas, A Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols, trans. Thomas McCarthy (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1984–87).Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Mahmood Mamdani, Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror (New York: Pantheon, 2004), pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Florence Mazian, Why Genocide? The Armenian and Jewish Experiences in Perspective (Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  8. Peter du Preez, Genocide: The Psychology of Mass Murder (New York: Boyars/Bowerdean, 1994).Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Alexander Laban Hinton, ed., Annihilating Difference: The Anthropology of Genocide (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  10. Karla Poewe, The Namibian Herero: A History of Their Psychological Disintegration and Survival (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen, 1985).Google Scholar
  11. Samuel Totten, William S. Parsons, and Israel W. Charney, eds, Genocide in the Twentieth Century: Critical Essays and Eyewitness Accounts (New York: Garland, 1995).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Eve Garrard and Geoffrey Scare, eds, Moral Philosophy and the Holocaust (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003).Google Scholar
  13. John K. Roth, ed., Ethics after the Holocaust: Perspectives, Critiques, and Responses (St. Paul, MN: Paragon House, 1999).Google Scholar
  14. Ervin Staub, The Roots of Evil (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  15. Laurence M. Thomas, Vessels of Evil: American Slavery and the Holocaust (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    John McDowell, Mind and World (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  17. Davidson, Truth and Interpretation (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 183–98.Google Scholar
  18. R. E. Nisbett, ed., Rules of Reasoning (London: L. Erlbaum, 1993).Google Scholar
  19. Arnold Silverberg, “Psychological Laws,” in Erkenntnis 58 (2003): 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 18.
    Martin Jay, Fin-de-Siècle Socialism and Other Essays (New York: Routledge, 1988), p. 33.Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    Jacques Derrida, “Otobiographies: The Teaching of Nietzsche and the Politics of the Proper Name,” in Christie V. McDonald, ed., The Ear of the Other: Otobiography, Transference, Translation, trans. Peggy Kamuf and Avital Ronell (New York: Schocken, 1985), pp. 30, 24.Google Scholar
  22. Jacob Golomb and Robert S. Wistrich, Nietzsche, Godfather of Fascism? On the Uses and Abuses of a Philosophy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Emmanuel C. Eze 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuel C. Eze

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations