Mary Hays (1759–1843): An Enlightened Quest

  • Gina Luria Walker


Mary Hays was the most purposefully intellectual woman within the tiny community of English Jacobins in the 1790s. Her experiences reveal much about the aspirations, opportunities and difficulties of women intellectuals in this period. Like her intimate friend Mary Wollstonecraft, she bootstrapped her way into masculine preserves of knowledge. Unlike Wollstonecraft, she possessed neither physical nor social grace, nor the self-confidence born of such qualities.2 Like Anna Barbauld, Hays probed the connections between religious, domestic, and political life. Unlike Barbauld, she had neither familial nor academic structures to advance her education or to provide collaborators and critical readers.3 She was encouraged by some of her contemporaries and repudiated by others, and she often undermined her own authority by retreating from the controversies she provoked.


Religious Discourse Woman Writer Intimate Friend Free Inquiry Gender Prejudice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 5.
    Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Selected Letters, ed. E. L. Griggs (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1966), I, p. 563.Google Scholar
  2. 9.
    Barbara Taylor, Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 188–9.Google Scholar
  3. 11.
    Jonathan Israel, ‘Introduction,’ Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+) (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 11.Google Scholar
  4. 12.
    Helena Rosenblatt, ‘The Christian Enlightenment,’ in The Cambridge History of Christianity, vol VII: Enlightenment, Revolution and Reawakening (1660–1815), eds Timothy Tackett and Stewart Brown (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
  5. 17.
    A. F. Wedd, ed., The Love-Letters of Mary Hays (1779–1780) (London: Methuen, 1925), p. 164.Google Scholar
  6. 21.
    Robert Robinson, Arcana, or the Principles of the Late Petitioners to Parliament (Cambridge: Fletcher and Hodson, 1774), p. 33.Google Scholar
  7. 23.
    Anne F. Wedd, Hays’s collateral descendant and first twentieth century editor, reported that Mrs. Hays disapproved of John because of his uncertain financial status, while the senior Mr. Eccles withheld support because John refused to continue in the family business. See A. F. Wedd, ‘The Story of Mary Hays,’ The Love-Letters of Mary Hays (1779–1780) (London: Methuen, 1925), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  8. 27.
    Len Addicott, ‘Introduction,’ Church Book: St Andrew’s Street Baptist Church, Cambridge ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+), (London: Baptist Historical Society, 1991), pp. i–xxxii. See also Robinson’s letter to Hays in which he addresses her concerns about the sectarian disputes then roiling English Dissenters. ‘Disputants here [in Cambridge] want me to take a side,’ he wrote, ‘and because I refuse to do so they represent me as a man void of all principles, to whom truth and error are alike indifferent.’ Robinson to Hays, 4 March 1789, Pforzheimer MS RR60.Google Scholar
  9. 32.
    Sally L. Jenkinson, ‘The Context of Heresy,’ Histories of Heresy in Early Modern Europe: For, Against, and Beyond Persecution and Toleration, ed. John Christian Laursen (New York: Palgrave, 2002), pp. 119–38.Google Scholar
  10. 33.
    Saurin, Jacques. ‘SERMON IV. The Repentance of the Unchaste Woman.’ Sermons Translated from the original FRENCH of The late Revd. James Saurin … Volume II. On the Truth of Revelation, trans. Robert Robinson, (Cambridge: Fletcher & Hodson, 1775. Rpt: Lepard, 1784), pp. ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+).Google Scholar
  11. 35.
    Robert Robinson, ‘Memoirs of the Reformation in France, and of the Life of the Rev. James Saurin, The Preface to the First Volume of a Translation of Saurin’s Sermons,’ Miscellaneous Works of Robert Robinson, [ed. Benjamin Flower] (Harlow: B. Flower, 1807), I, pp. 1–63.Google Scholar
  12. 105.
    See Alan Richardson, British Romanticism and the Science of the Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), p. 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gina Luria Walker 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gina Luria Walker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations