Abstract
Theodor Adorno (1970/1997) declared that art was a form of knowledge. In a somewhat related vein, his critical theorist colleague Herbert Marcuse (1956/1998) characterized art as a mode of cognition that is an alternative to positivism. The work of these two scholars is linked with the school of thought called ‘The Frankfurt School’. Famous for its notion and development of ‘critical theory’, the Frankfurt School’s work was carried out initially at the Institut für Sozialforschung (the Institute for Social Research). This Institute was established in, but financially independent of, Frankfurt University. Founded in February 1923, a number of the scholars associated with the Institute found themselves drawn to art and the aesthetics as arenas in which alternative ways of thinking and ‘seeing’ were possible. For this group of scholars, in many ways, authentic art represented a ‘Great Refusal’ (Marcuse, 1956/1998, p. 149) against totalizing forms of logic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carr, A. (2003). Art as a Form of Knowledge: The Implications for Critical Management. In: Carr, A., Hancock, P. (eds) Art and Aesthetics at Work. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554641_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554641_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42866-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-55464-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)