Skip to main content

The Context for Science and Technology Regulation

  • Chapter
  • 92 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Regulation ((STUDREG))

Abstract

This book sets out to explore and comment on the complexity of the regulatory processes governing the production, ownership and exploitation of science and technology. The chapters are mainly updated versions of papers presented at a seminar held in March 1996 organised by the Regulatory Policy Research Centre, Hertford College as one of the Regulatory Policy Seminar series funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (award no. R45126440395), and supported by Coventry Business School, where it was held. Two additional chapters (by David Charles and Henry Rothstein and Alan Irwin) have been included. The purpose of the seminar was to bring together a range of perspectives on the ways in which science and technology is regulated and brought together academics, policy makers, industrialists, and representatives from pressure groups. The key theme was the inseparability of the political-regulatory climate, the kind of science and technology research conducted in universities and in industry, the way that research is utilised by industry, and the intent to which it is used by actors within the regulatory system to support particular positions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, J., Lawton Smith H. and Towse, A. (eds) Regulation of the Phamacentical Industry Basingstoke: Palgrave forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M. (1999) ‘Britain lags in R&D’ Guardian (1999) 29 September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Bett Report (1999) Independent Review of Higher Education Pay and Conditions London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenburg, S. (1998) ‘University-industry relations, innovation and power: A theoretical framework for the study of technology transfer from the science base’ ESRC Centre for Business Research WP 102 September 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branscomb, L. M. (1993) ‘National Laboratories: The search for new missions and structures’ Ch. 4 in L. M. Branscomb (ed.) Empowering technology: Implementing a U.S. Strategy Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press pp. 103–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, L. (1999) ‘Glaxo cranks up NHS drugs row’ Guardian 5 October 1999, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M. and Towse, A. (1997) ‘Regulating Pharmaceutical Prices in the UK’ paper presented at Regulatory Policy Research Centre seminar on Regulation and Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry 20–21 March Hertford College, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesnais, F. (1993) ‘The French National System of Innovation’ Ch 6 R. Nelson, (ed.) (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David. P., Guena, A. and Steinmueller, W. E. (1995) ‘Additionally as a Principle of European R&D Funding’ Maastricht: Merit Working Paper 2/95-012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing Report Higher Education in the Learning Society 23 July 1997, Hayes: NCIHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry (1988) ‘DTI – The Department for Enterprise’ London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • DETR (1999) Regional Development Agencies’ Regional Strategies, www.localregions.detr.gov.uk/rdas.

    Google Scholar 

  • DETR (1999b) Personal Communication, 23 August 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEDA (1999) Towards a Regional Economic Development Strategy for the East of England: A consultation draft, Cambridge: EEDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (1994) ‘Academic-industry relations: a sociological paradigm for economic development’ in L. Leysdorff and P. Van den Bresselaar (eds) Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. and Stevens, A. J. (1995) ‘Inching towards Industrial Policy: The Universities’ Role in Government Initiatives to Assist Small, Innovative Companies in the US Science Studies, 8 (2) pp. 13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1999) Fifth Framework Programme 1998–2002: guidelines for Proposers Luxembourg: European Commission http://www.cordi.lu/fp5/src/guideline.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georghiou, L., Stein, J. A. Janes, M., Senker, J., Pifer, M., Cameron, H., Nedeva, M., Yates, J. and Boden, M. (1992) ‘The Impact of European Community Policies for Research and Technological Development upon Science and Technology in the United Kingdom’ Report prepared for DGXII of the Commission of the European Communities and the United Kingdom Office of Science and Technology, Brussels: EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, T. (1999) ‘Britain losing hi-tech race says Glaxo boss’ Guardian 13 September 1999, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillian, A. (1999) ‘Backlash against biotechnology pushes scientist to join brain drain’ Guardian 24 September 1999, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancher, L. and Moran, M. (1989) Capitalism, Culture, and Economic Regulation Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppell, S. (1997) ‘Regulation and Competition: A regulator’s point of view’ Paper presented at Regulatory Policy Research Centre seminar on Regulation and Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry 20–21 March Hertford College, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, A. (1997) ‘Privatisation comes to town: national policies and local responses – the Bristol case’ Regional Studies May 1997, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 253–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, H. and Hadden, M. ‘Merger and joint ventures in the pharmaceutical industry’ forthcoming in J. Abraham, H. Lawton Smith and A. Towse, (eds) Regulation of the Pharmaceutical Industry Basingstoke: Palgrave (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton Smith, H. (1999) Technology Transfer and Industrial Change in Europe Basingstoke: Macmillan – now Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahroum, S. (1998) ‘Europe and the Challenge of the Brain Drain’ The IPTS Report No. 29 November 1998 IPTS-JRC-Seville Spain, pp. 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD 1999 The Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard: Benchmarking the Knowledge-based Economies Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Observer (1999) ‘Catch 22’ Leader comment 3 October 1999, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (1996) Making PCR Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roobeek, A. J. M. (1990) Beyond the Technology Race: An Analysis of technology policy in Seven Industrial Countries Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1990) ‘Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?’ Research Policy 19 pp. 165–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEEDA (1999) Building a World Class Region: Towards an Economic Strategy for the South East of England, Guildford: SEEDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury Report (1999) Biotechnology Clusters; Report of a team led by Lord Sainsbury, Minister for Science August 1999 London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Save British Science (1994) Public Investment in Research and Development SBS 29–30 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Save British Science (1995) ‘Back to square one’ and ‘Reduced to the ranks’ Autumn 1995 Newsletter SBS 29–30 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ both page 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Save British Science (1999a) ‘At last the CSR’ Newsletter Winter 1999 SBS 29–30 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, page 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Save British Science (1999b) ‘Devolution and Science’ Summer Newsletter 1999 SBS 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9EZ page 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • SmithKline Beecham (1998) ‘Radicalism, rationalising or rationing – what does the UK want from research in the science base and health service’ Fifth Annual SmithKline Beecham Science Policy Symposium, Harlow: SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoneman, P. (1987) The Economic Analysis of Technology Policy Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dierdonck, R., Debackere, K. and Engelen, B. (1990) ‘University-industry relationships: How does the Belgian academic community feel about it?’ Research Policy, pp. 551–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, W. (1993) ‘National Innovation Systems: Britain’ Ch. 5 in R. Nelson, (ed.) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 158–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. and Lawton Smith, H. (1999) ‘Local Economic Development and Localities in the Newly Devolved Institutional Environment: The Cases of High-Technology Industry in Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire’ Paper presented at Regional Studies Association Annual Conference on 26 November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2002 Helen Lawton Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, H.L. (2002). The Context for Science and Technology Regulation. In: Smith, H.L. (eds) The Regulation of Science and Technology. Studies in Regulation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554528_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics