Abstract
My purpose in this chapter is to draw attention to the limitations of the epistemologies we have inherited from Renaissance humanism and Enlightenment rationality with regard to the possibility of an education for environmental sustainability. I shall suggest that more than crossdisciplinarity, and more than interdisciplinarity as conventionally defined (that is, as mixture of arts and science) is required, yet that we are constrained by inherited traditions of thought to do no more than move slowly and tentatively in this direction. First, I suggest that we must attempt to transcend these traditions through a greater emphasis on their cultural histories, so that we can appreciate both where they have come from and where they seem to be leading us; secondly, I argue for a more disciplined approach to the cultivation of forms of what, for want of a better phrase, I shall term ‘environmental literacy’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Eliot, T.S. (1964) Homage to John Dryden: Three Essays on Poetry of the Seventeenth Century. New York: Haskell House.
Garrard, G. (1996) ‘Radical pastoral?’ Studies in Romanticism, 35(3), 449–65.
Habermas, J. (1987) Knowledge and Human Interests. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Holland, A. (1994) ‘Natural capital’. In R. Attfield & A. Belsey (eds), Philosophy and the Natural Environment, pp. 169–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hirsch, E.D. (1987) Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Lawton, D. (1989) Education, Culture and the National Curriculum. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Marcinkowski, T. (1991) ‘The relationship between environmental literacy and responsible environmental behavior in environmental education’. In M. Maldague (ed.), Methods and Techniques for Evaluating Environmental Education. Paris: UNESCO.
Roth, C. (1992) Environmental Literacy: its Roots, Evolution and Direction in the 1990s. Ohio: Ohio State University.
Schama, S. (1995) Landscape and Memory. London: Harper Collins.
School Curriculum and Assessment Authority (UK) (1996) Teaching Environmental Matters Through the National Curriculum. London: HMSO.
Scottish Office (1993) National Strategy for Environmental Education in Scotland. Edinburgh: HMSO.
Skilbeck, M. (1976) ‘Ideologies and values’. Unit 3 of Course E203, Curriculum Design and Development. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Stables, A. (1993) ‘English and environmental education: the living nation in Macbeth’. The Use of English, 44, 218–25.
Stables, A. (1996) ‘Reading the environment as text: literary theory and environmental education’. Environmental Education Research, 2(2), 189–95.
Stables, A. (1997) ‘The landscape and “the death of the author” ’. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 2, 104–13.
Stables, A. (1998) ‘Environmental literacy: functional, cultural, critical. The case of the SCAA guidelines’. Environmental Education Research, 4(2), 155–64.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Andrew Stables
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stables, A. (2003). Environmental Education and the Arts–Science Divide: The Case for a Disciplined Environmental Literacy. In: Winnett, A., Warhurst, A. (eds) Towards an Environment Research Agenda. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230536814_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230536814_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39942-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-53681-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)