Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Modern History ((SMH))

  • 111 Accesses

Abstract

Most Habsburg historians agree that the medieval or feudal political order had been transformed by the late fifteenth century. Maximilian I (1493–1519), whom they view either as the last representative of medieval knights, or the first among ‘new monarchs’, was succeeded by rulers whose main aim it was to expand and consolidate the Habsburg dominions, centralize the administration and improve their military capacity. Although political culture retained many feudal elements in the following two and a half centuries, they are usually considered to be part of a stage in modern state-building; and this process, while slower and on a smaller scale, resembled the road to absolutism in other European countries. Historians have also followed RJW Evans’ lead in viewing the Counter-Reformation as a cornerstone in the formation of a symbiosis between the Habsburg rulers, the Church and the nobles. He believes that, although the ‘decisive years for [the monarchy’s] formation lay in the seventeenth century’, and ‘rested essentially on a series of bilateral agreements between the rulers and their mightier subjects’, the beginnings of the ‘aristocratic-clerical commonwealth’ must be sought in the later part of the previous century.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Wayne TeBrake, Shaping History: Ordinary People in European Politics, 1500–1700 (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1998), p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ingrao, The Habsburg Monarchy, 1618–1815 (Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. G. Koenigsberger, ‘Dominium Regale or Dominium Politicum et Regale’, in his Politicians and Virtuosi: Essays in Early Modern History (London: Hambledon Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Niccolò Machiavelli, Quentin Skinner and Russell Price (eds), The Prince (Cambridge, 1990), p. 8, quoted in J. H. Elliott, ‘A Europe of Composite Monarchies’, Past & Present, 137 (Nov. 1992), p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herman Wiesfiecker, Maximilian I. Die Fundamente des habsburgischen Weltreiches (Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik, 1991), pp. 189–92, 300–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karl Gutkas, Geschichte des Landes Niederösterreich (5th edn) (St. Pölten: N. ÖPressehaus, 1973), pp. 109–14, 117.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. v. Janko, Lazarus Freiherr von Schwendi, oberster Feldhauptmann und Rat Kaiser Maximilians II (Vienna, 1871), p. 147, quoted in M. C. Mandlmayr and K. G. Vocelka, ‘Vom Adelsaufgebot zum stehenden Heer. Bemerkungen zum Funktionswandel des Adels im Kriegswesen der frühen Neuzeit’, Wiener Beiträge zur Geschichte der Neuzeit, 8 (1980), p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fellner and Kretschmayr, Die Österreichische Zentralverwaltung I, pp. 38, Schwarz, Imperial Privy Council, pp. 64–5 and appendix C.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arnold Luschin von Ebengreuth, Geschichte des älteren Gerichtswesens in Österreich ob und unter der Enns (Weimar: Böhlaus, 1879), pp. 208.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Helmut Feigl, Die niederösterreichische Grundherrschaft vom ausgehenden Mittelalter bis zu den theresianisch-josephinischen Reformen (Vienna: Verein f. Landeskunde von NÖ, 1964), pp. 30–2, 238, 245; Angelika Hametner, ‘Die niederösterreichischen Landtage von 1530–1564’, (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Vienna, 1970), pp. 132–5. E. Kiebel, ‘Ungeld und Landgericht in Niederösterreich’, Mitteilungen des Instituts für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung (MIÖG) 52 (1938), pp. 269–87; Hassinger, ‘Die Landstände der österreichschen Länder’, pp. 1028–29; Roman Sandgruber, Ökonomie und Politik. Österreichische Wirtschaftsgeschichte vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart (Vienna: Ueberreuter, 1995), pp. 47–102; Putschögl, Die landständische Behördenorganization in Österreich ob der Enns vom Anfang des 16. bis zur Mitte des 18. Jahrhundert (Linz: OÖ. Landesarchiv, 1978), pp. 333–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oskar Regele, Der österreichische Hof kriegsrat 1556–1898. Ergänzungsband 1 (Vienna: Mitteilungen des österreichischen Staatsarchivs, 1949), pp. 15–17; Hellbling, Österreichische Verfassungs- und Verwaltungsgeschichte, p. 230.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karl Haselbach, ‘Die volkswirtschaftlichen Verhältnisse Niederösterreichs im XVI. und xvii. Jahrundert’, Blätter des Vereins für Landeskunde von Niederösterreich v, Neue Folge (1871), pp. 78–9; Fritz Weber, ‘Die Finanz- und Zollpolitik im 16. Jahrhundert und der Rückgang des niederösterr. Weinhandels’, JbLkNÖ, 31 (1953/4), pp. 133–48.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karl Haselbach, ‘Die volkswirtschaftlichen Verhältnisse Niederösterreichs’, pp. 78–9; Fritz Weber, ‘Die Finanz- und Zollpolitik’, 133–48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Julian H. Franklin, ‘Sovereignty and the Mixed Constitution: Bodin and his Critics’, in J. H. Burns (ed.), with the assistance of Mark Goldie, The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700, (Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 307–9. On the controversies over definitions of premodern and modern sovereignty, see John Hoffman, Sovereignty (Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1998), pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winfried Eberhard, ‘The Political System and the Intellectual Traditions of the Bohemian Ständestaat from the Thirteenth to the Sixteenth Century’, in R. J. W. Evans et al. (eds), Crown, Church and Estates p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roland Axtmann, “‘Police” and the Formation of the Modern State. Legal and Ideological Assumptions on State Capacity in the Austrian Lands of the Habsburg Empire, 1500–1800’, German History, 10 (1992), pp. 39–61; Wilhelm Brauneder, ‘Der soziale und rechtliche Gehalt der österreichischen Polizeiordnungen des 16. Jahrhunderts’, Zeitschrift für historische Forschung, 3 (1976), pp. 205–19; Helmut Feigl, ‘Die Oberösterreichischen Taidinge als Quellen zur Geschichte der Reformation und Gegenreformation’, MOÖLA, 14 (Linz, 1984), pp. 149–75; Gertraud Hampel-Kallbrunner, ‘Beiträge zur Geschichte der Kleiderordnungen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung Österreichs’ (Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Vienna, 1962); Vocelka, Public Opinion and the Phenomenon of Sozialdisziplinierung’, pp. 122–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. This is closer to Bousset’s position; see J. H. Burns, ‘Absolutism’, in J. H. Burns (ed.) The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700 pp. 30–4; Burns, Lordship, Kingship and Empire. The Idea of Monarchy 1400–1525 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Karin J. MacHardy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MacHardy, K.J. (2003). Political Culture, Political Space. In: War, Religion and Court Patronage in Habsburg Austria. Studies in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230536760_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230536760_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39087-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-53676-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics