Skip to main content

Action and Agent Nouns in French and Polysemy

  • Chapter

Abstract

In French, three main classes of deverbal nouns can be distinguished: action (or process) nouns, external argument nouns (generally called agent nouns) and internal argument nouns. Zwanenburg (1993) shows that the semantic structure of each of these three groups of deverbal nouns can be described in terms of argument structure, which is based on conceptual structure (Williams 1981). According to Di Sciullo and Williams (1987: 32–45), derived words tend to display function composition, which means that the arguments of the affixal head and those of the non-head base together compose the argument structure of the derived word. Action nouns are assumed to have an external argument position R, which is their reference. They have furthermore inherited all the arguments of the verbal base:

(1) l’accusation d’un innocent par Ie procureur

‘the accusation of an innocent person by the prosecutor’

External argument (or agent). nouns are characterized by the identification of the argument position Rwith the external argument position of the verbal base (Sproat 1985: 170–1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   170.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bisetto, A. and Scalise, S. ‘Compounding. Morphology and/or syntax?’, in L. Mereu (ed.), Boundaries of Morphology and Syntax (Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999), pp. 31–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Devos, F. and Taeldeman, J. ‘Een “escapade” in de woordvorming. Een contrastieve verkenning van deverbatieve nomina in het Nederlands en het Frans’, Leuvense Bijdragen, 89 (2000), pp. 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, A.M. and Williams, E. On the Definition of Word (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, N. ‘Syntactic affixation’, unpublished PhD thesis, MIT (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J. Argument Structure (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hietbrink, M. ‘Enige opmerkingen over de externe syntaxis van nomina agentis’, Corpus Gebaseerde Woordanalyse, Jaarboek VUAmsterdam (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J. ‘On semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry, 16 (1985), pp. 547–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. and Rappaport, M. ‘Non-event -er nominals: a probe into argument structure’, Linguistics, 26 (1988), pp. 1067–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman, P. ‘Deverbale procédés in het Nederlands en het Frans’, in L. Beheydt et al. (eds), Contrastief Onderzoek Nederlands-Frans, Bibliotheque des Cahiers de 1’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain, 108 (2001), pp. 195–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman, P. and Verheugd, E. ‘Deverbal adjectivalization as a gradual process’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 47 (2000), pp. 315–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, R. ‘On deriving the lexicon’, unpublished PhD thesis, MIT (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hout, A. ‘Deverbal nominalization, object versus event denoting nominals: implications for argument and event structure’, in F. Drijkoningen and A. van Kemenade (eds), Linguistics in the Netherlands, 8 (1991), pp. 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Willigen, M. ‘Adjectifs verbaux et participes passes adjectives des verbes transitifs’, Recherches de Linguistique francaise dUtrecht, V (1987), pp. 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. ‘Argument structure and morphology’, Linguistic Review, 1 (1981), pp. 81–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winther, A. ‘Note sur les formations déverbales en eur et en ant’, Cahiers de Lexicologie, XXVI (1975), pp. 56–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwanenburg, W. ‘Polysemy and homonymy of affixes: French -et etc. in diminutive and instrumental nouns’, Recherches de Linguistique francaise et romane dUtrecht, XII (1993), pp. 101–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2003 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sleeman, P., Verheugd, E. (2003). Action and Agent Nouns in French and Polysemy. In: Willems, D., Defrancq, B., Colleman, T., Noël, D. (eds) Contrastive Analysis in Language. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524637_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics