Skip to main content

A Semantic Map for Imperative-Hortatives

  • Chapter
Contrastive Analysis in Language

Abstract

This chapter is about similarities and differences in the way languages express orders, requests and exhortations. It crucially employs a so-called ‘semantic map’. The concept of the semantic map will be presented in section 2.1. Section 2.2 sketches some issues in the study of Imperatives and Imperative-like constructions. In section 2.3 a semantic map is proposed that yields some insights in the study of Imperatives and Imperative-like structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 170.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ammann, A. and van der Auwera, J. ‘A “new” Balkanism? Complementizerheaded main clauses for volitional moods in the languages of South-Eastern Europe’. Paper presented at the Balkan Sprachbund conference, Leiden (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. B. ‘The “Perfect” as a universal and as a language-particular category’, in P. J. Hopper (ed.) Tense-Aspect: between Semantics and Pragmatics (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1982), pp. 227–64.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. B. ‘Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: typologically regular asymmetries’, in W. Chafe and J. Nichols (eds), Evidentiality: the Linguistic Coding ofEpistemology (Norwood: Ablex, 1986), pp. 273–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzing, J. Kalmiickische Grammatik zum Nachschlagen. Turcologica 1. (Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birjulin, L. A. and Xrakovskij, V. S. ‘Imperative sentences: theoretical problems’, in V. S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of Imperative Constructions (Munich: LINCOM Europa, 2001), pp. 3–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, L. ‘The Alamblak language of Papua New Guinea (East Sepik)’, Pacific Linguistics, Series C, No. 81 (Canberra: ANU Dept of Linguistics-Research Unit of Pacific Studies, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, G. H. Number (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Curnow, T. J. ‘A grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquer): an indigenous language of south-western Colombia’, PhD dissertation, Australian National University (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cysouw, M. A. ‘The paradigmatic structure of person marking’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsen-Nielsen, N. Tense and Mood in English: a Comparison with Danish (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dryer, M., Haspelmath, M., Gil, D. and Comrie, B. (eds) World Atlas of Language Structures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortescue, M. ‘West Greenlandic’, Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars (London, Sydney & Dover, NH: Croom Helm, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois, A. ‘Contraintes de structures et liberté dans la construction du discours: une description du mwotlap, langue océanienne du Vanuatu’, Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris-IV Sorbonne (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevisse, M. Le bon usage. Grammaire francaise avec des remarques sur la langue francaise daujourdhui (Paris: Duculot, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, M. Indefinite Pronouns (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmer, S. The Middle Voice (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1993).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kenesei, I., Vago, R. M. and Fenyvesi, A. ‘Hungarian’, Descriptive Grammars (London: Routledge, 1998).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kordi, E. A. ‘Imperative sentences in French’, in V. S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of Imperative Constructions (Munich: LINCOM Europa, 2001), pp. 373–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozintseva, N. A. L. ‘Imperative constructions in Armenian’, in V. S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of Imperative Constructions (Munich: LINCOM Europa, 2001), pp. 245–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malchukov, A. L. ‘Imperative constructions in Even’, in V. S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of Imperative Constructions (Munich: LINCOM Europa, 2001), pp. 159–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslova, E. ‘A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir’, Habilitation dissertation, University of Bielefeld (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeuwis, M. ‘Lingala’, Languages of the World/Materials, No. 261 (Munich: LINCOM Europa, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedjalkov, I. ‘Evenki’, Routledge Descriptive Grammars (London: Routledge, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijkhoff, J., Bakker, D., Hengeveld, K. and Kahrel, P. ‘A method of language sampling’, Studies in Language, 17 (1993), pp. 169–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Th. A. and Ingemann, F. J. An Eastern Cheremis Manual. Phonology, Grammar, Texts and Glossary, Indiana University Publications, Uralic and Altaic Series 5- Studies in Cheremis, 9 (Bloomington, Ind. and The Hague: Indiana University and Mouton, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeets, C. J. M. A. ‘A Mapuche grammar’, Doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Traugott, E. C. ‘Conditional markers’, in J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1985), pp. 289–308.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Auwera, J. and Ammann, A. ‘Volitional convergence around the Mediterranean’, in P. Ramat and Th. Stolz (eds), Mediterranean Languages. Papers from the MEDTYP Workshop, Tirrennia, June2002. (Bochum: Universitatsverlag Dr N. Brockmeyer, 2002), pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Auwera, J., Dobrushina, N. and Goussev, V. ‘Imperative-Hortative systems’, in M. Dryer, M. Haspelmath, D. Gil and B. Comrie (eds), World Atlas of Language Structures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Auwera, J. and Plungian, V. ‘Modality’s semantic map’, Linguistic Typology, 2 (1998), pp. 79–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driem, G. A Grammar of Limbu (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xrakovskij, V. S. (ed.). Typology of Imperative Constructions [revised and expanded translation of Xrakovskij, Victor S. (ed.) 1992. Tipologija imperativnyx konstrukcij. St Petersburg: Nauka] (Munich: LINCOM, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanuttini, R. Negation and Clausal Structure: a Comparative Study of Romance Languages (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2003 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Auwera, J., Dobrushina, N., Goussev, V. (2003). A Semantic Map for Imperative-Hortatives . In: Willems, D., Defrancq, B., Colleman, T., Noël, D. (eds) Contrastive Analysis in Language. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524637_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics