Abstract
Since 9/11, governments around the world have been struggling to describe and respond to a radically changing international security landscape, and to extrapolate lessons for domestic security and defence policy. This has not been a calm and detached intellectual exercise, but has been accompanied and influenced by a series of diplomatic shifts and other, often much noisier events: military operations in Afghanistan; improved relations between the United States and Russia; the enlargement of NATO; the opening up of the Central Asian republics, diplomatically and militarily; the non-compliance of North Korea with nuclear non-proliferation norms and practices; and Libya’s decision to declare and renounce its development of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. At the time of writing (September 2004), disagreement over the US-1ed military action against Iraq in 2003 and its aftermath continued to divide the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and to undermine the United Nations Security Council. Governments have also renewed their interest in the old, cold-war problem of ‘civil defence’: how to prepare for a major attack on cities and facilities, and how to manage the consequences of such an attack for domestic society and government.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and references
On ‘catastrophic terrorism’ (deaths of 40,000 or more per event) see A. Carter, J. Deutch & P. Zelikow, ‘Catastrophic terrorism: tackling the new danger’, Foreign Affairs (November/December 1998). On ‘megaterrorism’ (deaths of 100,000 or more per event) see R. L. Garwin, ‘Are we safe yet?’ [Interview], IEEE Spectrum Online, January 2003, www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/publicfeature/jan03/elude.html On ‘religious terrorism’ see M. Juergensmeyer, Terror in the Mind of God: the Global Rise of Religious Violence (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000).
On ‘new’ terrorism, see W. Laqueur, ‘Postmodern terrorism: new rules for an old game’, Foreign Affairs (September/October 1996), and The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction (Oxford University Press, 1999).
See W. Laqueur, The Age of Terrorism (London: Little, Brown & Co., 1987);
W. Reich (ed.), Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1998);
B. Hoffman, Inside Terrorism (London: Gollancz, 1999);
W. Laqueur, A History of Terrorism (2001);
D. J. Whitaker, The Terrorism Reader (London: Routledge, 2001);
and D. C. Rapoport (ed.), Inside Terrorist Organisations (London: Frank Cass, 2002).
See M. Zanini and S. J. A. Edwards, ‘The networking of terror in the information age’, in J. Arquilla and D. Ronfeldt (eds), Networks and Netwars (Santa Monica: RAND, 2001), pp. 29–60.
See House of Commons Defence Committee (HCDC), Defence and Security in the UK: Volume I (London: The Stationery Office, 24 July 2002), para. 60.
For an analysis of the threat to economic targets, see D. Claridge, ‘The vanguard of the new counter-terrorism’, Security Monitor (1/4, November 2002), 13–15.
UK Home Office, Dealing with Disaster (UK Resilience website, third edition, www.ukresilience.info/contingencies/dwd/introduction.htm downloaded 7 April 2003), chapter 1. See also HCDC, Defence and Security in the UK, paras 160–2.
House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts (PAC), Facing the Challenge: NHS Emergency Planning in England (London: House of Commons, HC 545, 16 April 2003), Minutes of Evidence, Appendix 1, Question 126 (i), Ev 17.
See K. Jeffery and P. Hennessy, States of Emergency: British Governments and Strike-breaking Since 1919 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983).
See A. Dwyer, ‘“Prudent pessimism”: the management of terrorist threats against the railways in England, Scotland and Wales’, Security Monitor (1/4, November 2002), 3.
B. Durodié, ‘Perception and threat: why vulnerability-led responses will fail’, Security Monitor (1/4, November 2002), 17.
M. Prisk, Eternal Vigilance: the Defence of a Free Society (London: First Defence, January 2003).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Paul Cornish
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cornish, P. (2005). The United Kingdom. In: von Hippel, K. (eds) Europe Confronts Terrorism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524590_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524590_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54256-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52459-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)