Abstract
Despite the commitment of C. S. Lewis to an essentialist view of human nature and an appreciative mode of criticism that have fallen out of favor with modern scholars, he captures many viewpoints that have prevailed in the interpretation of Edmund Spenser’s religious allegory from the beginning through the present day.’ During his career at the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, this medieval and Renaissance scholar earned great renown during the middle of the twentieth century. Speaking of The Faerie Queene, he observes: Innumerable details come from the Bible, and specially from those books of the Bible which have meant much to Protestantism—the Pauline epistles and the Revelation. His anti-papal allegories strike the very note of popular, even of rustic, Protestant aversion; they can be understood and enjoyed by the modern reader (whatever his religion) only if he remembers that Roman Catholicism was in Spenser’s day simply the most potent contemporary symbol for something more primitive—the sheer Bogey, who often changes his name but never wholly retires from the popular mind.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further reading
Bennett, J. W. 1942. The Evolution of The Faerie Queene, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Borris, K. 1991. Spenser’s Poetics of Prophecy in The Faerie Queene V, Victoria: University of Victoria.
Christian, M., G. Borris, K. Kaske, C. B. Weatherby, A. L. Prescott, and J. Schiavoni. 2001. “Spenser’s Theology: The Sacraments in The Faerie Queene”, Reformation 6: 103–77.
Gless, D. J. 1994. Interpretation and Theology in Spenser, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenblatt, S. 1980. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gregerson, L. 1995. The Reformation of the Subject: Spenser, Milton, and the English Protestant Epic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hankins, J. E. 1945. “Spenser and the Revelation of St. John”, PMLA 60: 364–81.
Kaske, C. 1999. Spenser and Biblical Poetics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
King, J. N. 1985. “Was Spenser a Puritan?”, Spenser Studies 6: 1–31.
—. 1990. Spenser’s Poetry and the Reformation Tradition, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2000. Milton and Religious Controversy: Satire and Polemic in Paradise Lost, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mallette, R. 1997. Spenser and the Discourses of Reformation England, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Norbrook, D. G. 1984. Poetry and Politics in the English Renaissance, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Whitaker, V. K. 1950. The Religious Basis of Spenser’s Thought, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Yates, F. 1947. “Queen Elizabeth as Astraea”, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 10: 27–82.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 John N. King
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
King, J.N. (2006). Religion. In: van Es, B. (eds) A Critical Companion to Spenser Studies. Palgrave Advances. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524569_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524569_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51449-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52456-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)