Abstract
In 1648, fifty years after Spenser’s death, a section of The Faerie Queene was published separately in a small quarto of eleven printed pages. The work consisted of twenty-five verses from Spenser’s magnum opus, (V.ii.29–54), detailing Artegall’s defeat of the Giant with the Scales, obviously recognised then as now, as one of the key political passages in the work (Patterson 1992; O’Connell 1990b). The extract was given the grand title, The faerie leveller, or, King Charles his leveller descried and deciphered in Queene Elizabeths dayes by her poet laureat Edmond Spenser, in his unparaleld poeme entituled, The faerie qveene, a lively representation of our times. The last phrase is the key to reading the text, an insight developed in the prefatory material which argues that ‘the Prince of English Poets Edmund Spenser’ wrote verses which ‘then propheticall are now become historicall in our dayes’ (3). Spenser’s story of the knight of Justice arguing with the Giant who tries to impose universal equality by weighing everything in his scales, before throwing him off a cliff, is interpreted as a royalist fable. Artegall is King Charles; Talus is ‘The Kings forces’; ‘The Giant Leveller’ is ‘Col. Oliver Cromwell’ (4).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further reading
Aptekar, J. 1969. Icons of Justice: Iconography and Thematic Imagery in the ‘Faerie Queene; Book V, New York: Columbia University Press.
Cain, T. H. 1978. Praise in The Faerie Queene’, Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press.
Canny, N. 2000. ‘The Social and Political Thought of Spenser in His Maturity’, in Jennifer Klein Morrison and Matthew Greenfield, eds, Edmund Spenser: Essays on Culture and Allegory, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 107–22.
Fowler, E. 1995. ‘The Failure of Moral Philosophy in the Work of Edmund Spenser’, Representations 51: 47–76.
Hackett, H. 1995. Virgin Mother, Maiden Queen: Elizabeth I and the Cult of the Virgin Mary, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Hadfield, A. 1998. ‘Was Spenser a Republican?’, English 47: 169–82.
McCabe, R. A. 1987. ‘The Masks of Duessa: Spenser, Mary Queen of Scots, and James VI’, ELR 17: 224–42.
McLane, P. E. 1961. Spenser’s ‘Shepheardes Calender’: A Study in Elizabethan Allegory, Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press.
Montrose, L. 2002. ‘Spenser and the Elizabethan Political Imaginary’, ELH 69: 907–46.
Norbrook, D. 2002. Poetry and Politics in the English Renaissance, rev. edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Connell, M. 1977. Mirror and Veil: The Historical Dimension of Spenser’s Faerie Queene, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Suttie, P. 1998. ‘Edmund Spenser’s Political Pragmatism’, Studies in Philology 95: 56–76.
Wilson-Okamura, D. S. 2002. ‘Spenser and the Two Queens’, ELR 32: 62–84.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Andrew Hadfield
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hadfield, A. (2006). Politics. In: van Es, B. (eds) A Critical Companion to Spenser Studies. Palgrave Advances. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524569_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524569_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51449-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52456-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)