Skip to main content

The Aftermath of Welfare Reform in the USA

  • Chapter
Globalization and the Welfare State

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 145 Accesses

Abstract

The 1996 welfare reform act is now in the normal course of revision and renewal, a process called ‘reauthorization’ in the American system. Its proper name is the ‘Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act’ (PRWORA) but this sort of verbal inflation is typical of the US Congress. It cannot be said that either the Administration or the Congress is basing its decisions on any serious analysis of the working of the 1996 Act, and that is an interesting fact by itself. This brief note cannot fill that gap, but it will make some selected inferences, and at least point to the relevant academic literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berlin, Gordon (2000) Encouraging Work, Reducing Poverty: The Impact of Work Incentive Programs, New York: MDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, Rebecca M. (2002) ‘Evaluating Welfare Reform in the United States’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, December, pp. 1105–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancian, Maria; Klawitter, Manika M., Meyer, Daniel R., Rangarajan, Anu, Wallace, Geoffrey and Wood, Robert G. (2003) ‘Income and Program Participation Among Early TANF Recipients: The Evidence from New Jersey, Washington and Wisconsin’, Focus, vol. 22, no. 3, Summer (Institute for Research on Poverty of the University of Wisconsin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grogger Jeffrey, Karoly Lynn, and Klerman, Jacob Alex (2000) ‘Conflicting Benefits: Trade-Offs in Welfare Reform’, Rand Review, vol. 26, no. 3, Fall (Rand Corporation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueron, Judith and Pauly, Mark (1991). From Welfare to Work, New York: Russell Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, Robert (2002/3) ‘When Work Alone is Not Enough’, La Follette Policy Report, vol. 13, no. 2, Fall Winter Robert M. La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loprest, Pamela (2001) How Are Families that Left Welfare Doing?, Assessing the New Federalism Project, Urban Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. and Gutmann, A. (eds) (1998) Work and Welfare, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Solow, R.M. (2004). The Aftermath of Welfare Reform in the USA. In: Södersten, B. (eds) Globalization and the Welfare State. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524422_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics